How did the US think it was ok to use a GPMG designed from the ground up as a vehicle mounted weapon as a dismounted infantry weapon? How did it go on for decades in the same heavy as fuck and with the more vehicularly suited buttstock of the M240B?
It's damn near 9 pounds heavier than a PKM, and about 4.5 pounds heavier than the M60 that it replaced. Not a big deal for a vehicle mounted weapon, but that weight difference represents a potential for hundreds of rounds of ammunition.
>Just suck it up
I know this will come up. This is a stupid defense of a design flaw when it has been demonstrated a comparable weapon can be made that weighs less.
>>33952378
Lots of countries use the FN MAG.
Isn't that what the Mk 48 exists for?
>>33952378
It's the best GPMG other than a MG3.
>deal with if fuckboi
Because NATO.
>>33952391
After decades of the M240. And it isn't being widely adopted. The military is using the marginally lighter M240L and calling it a day.
>>33952378
>How did the US think it's ok to use a general purpose machine gun as a general purpose machine gun?
Idk. Truly a mystery of our time.
>>33952378
assthetics
>>33952404
>Da best!
It's performance is comparable to a PKM with some bricks strapped to it.
>>33952420
>It's
camp.
>>33952423
>>33952378
The M60 didn't age well.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=BNVegwmZiQM
Damn, being a gunner sucked cock, but being an ammo bitch was worse.
The 240L was hardly an improvement either.
OP you triggered me.
>>33952378
get swoll fuccboi manlet
>>33952378
>It's damn near 9 pounds heavier than a PKM, and about 4.5 pounds heavier than the M60 that it replaced
I know this might be tough for you to understand Ivan but when children have more to eat than poverty and vodka they grow in to nonstunted adults and are capable of carrying such things.
>>33952488
No, fuck off. Did you ever have to carry this bullshit? It was fucking retarded. Having to have a dedicated ammo bitch is dumb as fuck.
ITT:
OP only looks at weight figures in a vacuum without considering what that weight means for the gun.
>>33952378
How is it that no one can design a GPMG better than the PKM?
>>33952448
i deployed with 3rd ID aviation in 2005 to iraq.
We still had a lot of M60s, and the blackhawk crewchiefs prefered them to the m240.
>>33953318
Given M60's have terrible reliability that is an indicator of his preference for what he learned with.
>>33953308
>AK upside down=PKM
>M16 upside down=?????
>>33952378
If it makes you feel better, the latest iteration the army has been integrating is a good deal lighter. Plus its a pretty kickass weapon system to have at the platoon level. To each their own though.
>L85: everyone hated it or was ambivalent
>LSW aka the crow cannon: oh god please no why are we getting these out
>LMG: fuck off jam
>GPMG: fuck yeah, The General
That was my experience of it and virtually everyone else around me was about the same. The only shit thing about it was picking up all the brass and link, if you did it at all. Cleaning wasn't even that bad since people were less autistic about it and accepted that it wasn't going to ever be spotless and actually acknowledged that it would work fine anyway.
>>33953308
they did, it's called the PKP :^)
>>33952378
The old fat cunt of a MAG 58 was actually one of the few guns anyone ever complained about.
They just shit out bullets and kill people all day long.
>>33955908
>GPMG
GMGP. I'm the General, using this Machine Gun, with fucking Purpose.
>>33953351
Promote ahead of peers.
Does reserve force or other military branch still use M60?
>>33953351
>W19
>>33956127
the dutch i think
hey guys!
>>33956168
Danish, not Dutch.