Can an educated anon explain what on gods name i am looking at?

File: Q-313-4.jpg (69KB, 600x418px)

69KB, 600x418px

and notice you don't really sit in it,it's more like you sit on it...

>>33889853
Where is pylons? how will it carry weapons? why does it look like they wanted it to be stealthy but after doing the nose they just said fuck it, batman my shit up?

It's a tiny hobby jet, assuming it ever gets off the ground it will likely have performance inferior to an Aero L-39.

File: m02017041600004.jpg (134KB, 920x613px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 920x613px

where is its nozzles? how long would it take for 2 J85s to set fire to ABS plastic surrounding it without nozzles?

File: 1491009966625.jpg (31KB, 239x239px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 239x239px

>>33889853
It looks so small

>>33889853
It's a fake they're using to troll everyone into thinking they have a stealth fighter.

There was a picture of the cockpit interior that someone used to determine the avionics were just things like cheap LCD displays and fish finders off of Amazon.

File: Qaeher 313.jpg (419KB, 1078x761px) Image search: [Google]

419KB, 1078x761px

>>33889853

>>33890116
Maximum kek

File: 1405368127588.jpg (269KB, 1600x811px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 1600x811px

>>33889994

>>33889903
I think you meant L-29

>>33889853
Because it *looks* high tech. It *looks* like the future.

>>33890296
Total sum from ebay; 7 500 dollars.

>>33889868

Like sit on top kayaks, sit on top fighters are more comfortable for casual users.

>>33889868
The canopy looks like it was made in somebody's garage
>because it was

File: fkyPT5ABgF-12.png (9KB, 300x250px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 300x250px

>>33890296
>Failing to mention the airspeed indicator, which indicates a vNE, iirc, in the low 200 knot range

>>33890296
That fucking glass fiber cabin...

>>33890296
Also that fucking stick
>Can't pull it back past half way
>Rubber seal like a fucking 90's Miata
>Stretched between four bolts

I've seen simulator cockpits that look more feasible than this, and those tend to have appropriate avionics for their aircraft instead of. Random assortment of GA shit that indicates little understanding of what information is actually desirable to have

A meme, really.

>>33890296
Man, the pilots legs are gonna block half of the gauges and switches and the seat is going to make it difficult to steer...

What jet fighter uses a center stick nowadays anyway?

>>33890656
The stick itself, is it a legit one they pulled off one of their Tomcats, or is it a Top Gun one they bought off E-Bay?

>>33893363
Plastic ebay shit.

You can tell because Tomcat joysticks are metal.

>>33890777
F-15, F-18, Eurofighter, Gripen, Su-35, etc

>>33893384
My point is I can't tell if it's metal or not. Do we have a better image?

>>33890116
Good shit nibba

>>33893397
So basically nothing that's been made in the last 25 years?

>>33889853

Propaganda is just state-funded shitposting.

>>33889853
The crooked wing is trying to copy lifting body type designs

The high air intakes indicate its intended to operate at higher altitudes, with the hope that the body of the plane will mask the intakes, which are the hot spot on radar returns.

Big belly for internal stores, perhaps? Again, trying to reduce radar returns, as well as improve aerodynamics.

>>33889868
F-15 and F-16 offered similar, though not quite as extreme visibility.

>>33889903
I'd expect a little better pure performance, probably with less range and payload though. From a design standpoint, I'd hope for at least supersonic, but the small intakes indicate small engines, so probably not.

>>33890296
The instrument panel seems shockingly bare.

North Korea/Iran dont really deploy new weapons that arent direct reverse-engineers of Sino-Russian ones. They do however deploy large amounts of propaganda weapons meant to be paraded around for the cameras

Iranian MBTs are pulled around on trucks on military parade, they dont even have engines. this should tip you off to the nature of Irans "stealth fighter"

No footage of it flying is a big hint

>>33893506
>nobody has seen one flying

Truly the stealthiest plane

>>33889868
Is it normal for aircraft canopies to distort light this much?

>>33889853
It's not a real airplane.

There are a lot of retards on /k/, don't listen to them. They're going to tell you the mockup that wasn't supposed to work can't work. They're too stupid to realize mockups are not built to work, they're built to demonstrate.

Iran has been under sanctions for decades so they built this as proof-of-concept that they can make a a 100% completely indigenous jet. Its probably not meant for air-to-air, but instead air-to-ground, hence why the radome is so small.

>>33890296
I have the same multi media, head unit in my car

>>33893596
Literally sugar glass.

>>33893423
What the hell is wrong with center-stick?

>>33894683
probably nothing if it's fly by wire and the movement is all in the wrist but when it's attached to a post out of a 1920s biplane, that's kinda iffy

Low cost ultralight jet. It probably only costs $100,000 or less to build them.

There's no real direct comparison to compare it to. My guess is it could fire ATGMs and guided munitions at low tech enemies like ISIS. Basically acting as a manned predator. Alternatively they might try using them in large numbers, if you have 300 of them they might be able to overwhelm some air defenses. If some slip through and damage critical AA systems the F-4s and F-14s can then deliver proper attacks.

>>33893440
Kek, and also eloquent.

so it's obviously a piece of shit, but is it even real? Is it all just fake, or does it at least like.. fly.

>>33895401
There's a video of it taxing

>>33889868
>muh visibility

>>33893710
>air to ground
For now it seems like it's more ground-to-ground orientated.

>>33893710
You know, mock-ups aren't supposed to be half-assed models with mismatched components. They are supposed to demonstrate an aircraft of what it should be supposed to be carrying without actually having to fly.

Look at how American companies do mock-ups, hell, even the Chinese J-20 mockup looks better than this piece of shit.

Iran makes a lot of shit to make it's military look better to the populace. It's a water balloon to a pufferfish.

File: maxresdefault.jpg (210KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

210KB, 1280x720px

Sad that this is what a state builds to show off what they can do

there is a small group of enthusiasts in Canada building a 2/3rd flying scale replica of the Avro Arrow that looks like it will be more airworthy than the qaher, and the Arrow literally being built by some guys in a shed

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=zbggGyCmNAI

>>33894683
Center stick is indicative of a plane that isn't fly-by-wire, meaning it has positive stability, meaning that while being relatively easy to fly it will perform like ass.

In a tiny-assed supposedly 5th gen stealth air superiority fighter, it means the cockpit is 100% hoax as there is absolutely zero possibility of it actually working with analog controls.

>>33897541
So a F-16 will have superior performance?

>>33897541
Do you actually know what you are talking about at all? Plenty of fly-by-wire aircraft have center sticks.

F-15 doesn't have proper fly-by-wire, are you going to try to tell me it performs like ass?

File: Boeing Bird of Prey.jpg (408KB, 1800x1134px) Image search: [Google]

408KB, 1800x1134px

>>33889853
I'm pretty sure they just looked at the Boeing Bird of Prey, and said "let's copy that but change it enough so it doesn't look copied."

>>33898263
To be fair, side stick is more ergonomically correct, and center is a holdover of mechanically linked systems.

>>33893949
Maybe it's 5th gen fighter jet and you just didn't know?