what's wrong with this stance? I don't see why it can't

>>33689637
absolutely, and it looks so cool!
SEMPHER FI!

>how do sights work

China had a lot of Mauser autopistols because arms embargoes mostly went for rifles, and they'd hold the gun sideways to let the recoil sweep rooms

File: Natural monopoly.png (162KB, 737x481px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 737x481px

>>33689637

>I don't see why it can't be considered a legitimate aim stance

Then you're basically retarded. The sights are on the top of the gun. You will not hit anything holding a pistol sideways.

>>33690426
If you hold the gun sideways, then you can look down the sights from the side moron. I bet I'd be better at sideways than you are topways.

File: image.jpg (107KB, 500x371px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 500x371px

>>33690883

>>33689637
>revolver

File: tmp_14964-1488663378947800792878.png (325KB, 522x593px) Image search: [Google]

325KB, 522x593px

>>33690883
>thinking the sights are aligned with the bore axis

I shot USPSA for a while, so hear me out..

When we'd shoot a weak-hand stage, we'd cant (lean) the gun in towards our centerline, as it helped you manage the recoil better.

90 degrees is just retarded. Here's where it comes from: cops using the riot shield.

If our eyes and arms were vertically aligned that grip would be fine.