Hi /k/, my 21st is coming up soon and i've been looking

File: 221758455606.jpg (78KB, 800x330px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 800x330px

>>33683962
38 detective special

yes, that's frank sinatra

File: 81W4d5A.jpg (662KB, 1280x1024px) Image search: [Google]

662KB, 1280x1024px

>>33683962
Cz. It's sooo sexy.

>>33683962
Second vote for cz75.

>>33683962
I've owned all three, still own the CZ and the Beretta. Personally I like the Beretta more though, due to safety location (do not listen to the chuckle fucks that speech about slide vs. frame safeties). I would say hold both in your hands and see which feels better. If you do go with the Beretta get the M9a1, it costs hardly any more than the 92FS.

File: cz-usa-cz-75-kadet-adapter.png (287KB, 841x561px) Image search: [Google]

287KB, 841x561px

Buy a CZ 75 and a Cadet Kit.
9mm and .22 out of the same pistol, what's not to like?

>>33684514
Any reason why you don'the have as much love for the Walther? Also, why m9a1 over 92fs?

>>33684395
This -- although OP could also get a Beretta 92 Inox for at least as much raw sex appeal.

Though as >>33684514 this guy says, it's best to try them out for yourself if possible.

Gp100 in 357

>>33683962
For a-e-s-t-h-e-t-i-c-s and best grip CZ 75. Only complaint is the small racking area because of the slide design and narrow sights also are a minus.
For reliability and resale value the Beretta 92fs. Love mine and will never sell it. The front sight cannot be replaced without milling it so I recommend the a1 over the FS.

>>33684625
$431 MSRP for the Kadet kit.

I want one but for that price I can just buy a whole 'nother gun.

>>33683962
>CZ-75B