https://lenta.ru/news/2017/04/15/ci rkon/ >Russia's

I thought we've done Mach 27 but weird shit starts happening so they slowed the other "vehicles" down below 20?

>>33682277
This is russia, not the US.

Our Railguns can go fucking crazy fast, but yea things get a bit weird at those speeds.

>>33682277 checked
>but weird shit starts happening
>>33683042
>but yea things get a bit weird at those speeds.
I've heard this from my brother in laws brother in law, a legit RD rocket scientist but he wouldn't get into specifics even though I asked a few times. What do you mean by weird?

>>33683696
it's not weird, it's just that at those speed the missile gets so hot that after a while it melts / loose its shape. it wouldn't be such a problem if it wasn't moving a Mach 20+ but at those speed any bumps or crease big enough on the surface can deviate your ammunition, or worse it deviates it so fast that it just "tumbles" in mid air and loose any coherent shape. you have to understand that at those speed the air feels like concrete. imagine what would happen if you were driving at 120mph on a straight line and then suddenly turned your steering wheel to the right as far as you could.

>>33682217
>>33682277
What anti-ship missiles fly at Mach 20/27?

File: 1492249517182.jpg (101KB, 500x501px) Image search: [Google]

101KB, 500x501px

>mach 27
Sure. Totally plausible aside from the fact that air would literally liquify and then instantly turn to plasma in like 1000 cubic metres wherever it moves and the you would have to make a successful slingshot maneuver around the sun to get it up to those speeds. Also the fuel usage rate of around 10.000 litres per second and The manufacturing of the hull made of unobtaniun which requires the suns core as a smelter continue to be a problem

>>33683738
>>33683755
The Chinese missile he is referring to is a ballistic missile, Zirkon is a cruise missile.

File: well dome my good sir.jpg (31KB, 398x506px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 398x506px

>>33683755
10/10, I enjoyed every single bit of this post. Brought me back to 2004 at least. Well done.

>>33683786
That's what I thought.

>>33683786
>The Chinese missile he is referring to is a ballistic missile

?????

That is the re-entry vehicle after using the orbit to increase velocity. Otherwise that is ICBM tier shit.

Impressive

China truly is in the fore front of military development. They should be wary of Americans trying to steal the technology like what America did to Soviet Union.

>>33683696
The guy that said it was a Lockheed engineer but that's about all he said. I think ablative coatings were being tested on it as well, but >>33683717 seems generally consistent with what he was getting at.

File: juliusethelrosenberg.jpg (80KB, 645x501px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 645x501px

>>33684233
the toppest of keks

russia and china dont get high tech unless a jew sells them america's tech