We have many threads about favorite WWII tank so I'll ask

>>33671568
This thread deserves more attention.

I universally dislike all the Italian, Japanese, and Hungarian tanks of WWII just because of how blatantly incompetent those tanks were.

Early Shermans

Might as well have put some medieval knight armor on a soldier with a rocket launcher, it would have been just as effective

File: TANK_IS_INNOCENT.jpg (43KB, 361x269px) Image search: [Google]

43KB, 361x269px

>>33671568

That's impossible. I can't hate a tank design: even the Japanese tankettes that could be punctured by rifle fire were only trying to do their jobs on a shoestring budget, and still managed to be effective in the Chinese theater. The Valiant might have not been a good vehicle, but it was an importent lesson in design that led to better things like the Centurion!

At worst, a tank might disappoint me for never reaching its potential like the Mark I Medium or T-35, but those tanks were designed for earlier wars which never came.

>>33671674
As expected from you, Yukari.

Anything with curves, most round turrets, and stubby guns. Examples are most french tanks, a1 shermans, and early panzer 4 with the low velocity gun. I know hating thicc tanks is an unpopular opinion but i like big guns and straight edges more than curvy shit. Round armored cars are pretty cool though

File: IMG_3915.gif (2MB, 255x191px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 255x191px

>>33671568
>That char 2c
Can you imagine that thing coming towards you

>>33671568

The mother fucking M18 hellcat is a shit.

It can get killed by an HMG or a grenade, it's combat mobility is useless, it's strategic mobility is meh without factoring in it's lack of protection then it's non existent. The M10 is objectively better.

>>33671568
Literally all Japanese tanks.
The Italian tanks were just autism from pasta men, the Japanese tanks had designs and they honestly believed most of them would work. Especially considering their superheavy programs.

All of them were absolute garbage and effective just making little moveable bunkers that had less protection than a bunker yet more risk too.

>>33671659
except that's wrong you fucking retard

>>33671568
I fuckin hate the KV-1. Can't pen the damn thing if my life depended on it.

Theres also an american tank that uses a .50 cal MG as the main armament and has no armor. Useless.

>Warthunder player since 2014

>>33671946

>He still plays WT

Why do you have shit taste and are a glutton for punishment?

File: char_b1_bis_2.png (170KB, 547x232px) Image search: [Google]

170KB, 547x232px

>>33671674
How about this:
>one man turret
>drained resources from the entire army.
>unreliable
>small turret makes it look like Schlitzie
>BTFO by early Pz 3 and Pz 4s
>Wanked by obnoxious ouiaboos.

>>33671979
t.world of tanks mongoloid

>>33671979
name a tank game thats actually good and somewhat realistic and has a multiplayer playerbase

>>33671568
Anything French, M3s, and M4s.

>>33672032
Warthunder

>>33672050
that was kind of my point

>>33671997

>My game is shit
>But there is this other game that's bad so you probably play that game so fuck you

Grow up.

>>33672032

Not War Thunder.

Any multi-turreted tank, or any tank with a hull/sponson mounted main gun.

>>33672090
>Not War Thunder.
please elaborate and provide examples to back up your claims

File: 1383179237637.gif (1MB, 280x210px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 280x210px

>>33672093
>Stug was the worst tank

>>33672105
>StuG not technically a tank

File: 1417921549992.png (269KB, 414x480px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 414x480px

>defending War Blunder and the gaijew overlords

There are no good multiplayer tank games. It's sad but you'll have to deal with it one way or another.

File: armat14.png (260KB, 590x347px) Image search: [Google]

260KB, 590x347px

>>33672149
>Arma 3 Tanks DLC

>>33671984
At least it's not the panzer being gangbanged by wehraboos every second

>>33672168
Not a tank game.

>>33671984
remember that time a B1 Bis took 140 hits but destroyed 14 panzer 3s and 4s in a single pass of a town?

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rBdOp4Btfrg&spfreload=10

>>33672104

What I meant is that War Thunder is not what you asked for.

Though if you want a good tank game Men of War is 100x better.

>>33672195
tanks arent even the focus yet its still better.

>>33672334

>Playing MoW
>Trying to get trough the DC invasion scenario from CoD in the FT-17
>Usually do well until a cheeky breeki manages to sneak behind around act 2 and lobs a moltov onto my engine
>If not, die to the sandbag nest next to the first flag because of a stupid invincible car blocking my cannon