Why would you attach a parachute to a free-fall conventional bomb?
>https://youtu.be/d0mWMBbiZeM
>>33667518
It would fall slower, is this a joke?
>>33667518
If you are flying low enough, you could get caught in the blast. By using a parachute or drogue or something similar, you allow yourself time to get out of range.
>>33667532
But what's the point of having it fall slower?
>>33667540
Doesn't make sense in 99% of cases.
>>33667555
>Doesn't make sense in 99% of cases.
except this exactly the reason why you use retarded bombs, low altitude or nuclear bombs to escape blast radius
those same bombs can use either hi drag or low drag tails depending on mission
>>33667555
>Doesn't make sense in 99% of cases.
Well, tell that to the Air Force.
>>33667555
High drag bombs are useful when you're doing low altitude bombing runs. Compared with a conventional bomb, it's going to take the same amount of time to hit the ground, but if you don't somehow slow it down, the thing is going to be roughly right below the aircraft when it hits. High drag bombs let you bomb shit from 100 feet, and the bombs will explode way behind the aircraft.
>>33667555
>Doesn't make sense in 99% of cases.
why?
who cares if the bomb reaches the ground in 2 or 10 seconds?
To ensure the safe arrival of fragile bombs, duh
>>33667629
>>33667670
>>33667692
>>33667702
Fair enough.
Convention bro
"bomb bomb bomb"
Clear countermeasures
"bomb bomb bomb"
Die
Prepared to die anyway
>>33667518
Retard.
>>33668743
This might be the greatest underrated post I've ever seen. But not sure if you meant it that way.
>>33667518
Google retarded bomb and enjoy
>>33667518
So the aircraft can escape the bomb's blast. But this is usually done for low level attacks. The video shows attacks from higher altitudes. Maybe the parachutes improve accuracy or predictability?
>>33667702
>who cares if the bomb reaches the ground in 2 or 10 seconds
Read thread. Altitude and speed of aircraft and bomb blast radius are all the relevant factors on why you need to slow a bomb down.
Quick and dirty pic...
Yes! perfect response >>33668743