How can this thing generate a 30% higher sortie rate if it only

>>33661750

The elevators move faster

File: elevatoractionreturns_1.jpg (153KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 640x480px

This is now an elevator thread

>>33661750

elevators catapults the aircraft straight into the sky

>>33661750

Because sortie rate isn't just depended on elevators?

>>33661750
They're 30% bigger.

It has a -9001% lower sortie rate because its god damn catapults don't work at all.

>>33661750

The fourth elevator was basically never used. Ever. Hence why they removed it from the design for the Ford.

It gains its sortie rate through a whole ream of other improvements to the process ot getting aircraft ready, the biggest one being the EML is much quicker to set up and operate than steam catapults.

>>33661803
The mental image of this gave me a good laugh.

>>33662075
This.

Also it's munitions handling is much more efficient

File: f15-submarine2.jpg (14KB, 550x400px) Image search: [Google]

14KB, 550x400px

>>33661803

>>33661803
Could they stand and F-35 on its tail and launch it straight up?

File: IMG_0701.jpg (47KB, 768x572px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 768x572px

>>33661861
*leans into mic* wrong. Stupid vatnik, you're just jealous that your carrier doesn't have a catapult.

File: 1479096521985.jpg (387KB, 785x757px) Image search: [Google]

387KB, 785x757px

>>33661750
>elevators
They're called lifts you stupid burger.

>>33661750
What a beautifull machine.

>>33663684
Do you even own a gun

>>33661750
I've once calculated that if cariers had a square cross section and the extra volume was filled with helium, it would have enought boyuancy to fly. Why it was never tried?

File: 1474315181907.png (219KB, 664x520px) Image search: [Google]

219KB, 664x520px

>>33665585
>Do you even own a gun

>>33661750
It has a small elevator just for bombs.

>>33663684
for you

>>33661750

It's got a huge kitchen capable of making 30% more satay than american equivalent kitchens!

File: KEK (2).jpg (56KB, 741x881px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 741x881px

>>33665640

>>33663684

And what's the correct Pakistani word for ramp?

>>33665640
I actually work for the shipyard that builds them, I'll pitch that idea first thing Monday morning.

>>33663469
Aircraft carrier subs when?

>>33663684
Just like a flashlight is called a torch, and chips are crisps, and cigarettes are fags? Take back your place as the dominant superpower in the world, then maybe people will start using your idiotic slang words again.

>>33665833
Brits are subjects, they don't have rights, they gave them all away in exchange for tea.

>>33663684
Isn't it illegal to punch people in the caliphate?

>>33666910
WWII, the I-400 class submarines

>>33663676
He could be a chicom too.

>>33667551
Neat but not what I had in mind. I was thinking more along the lines of nuclear powered carrier-sized sub with ICBM styled fighter deployment

>>33667551
>>33667665
https://youtu.be/on9fqc5RWbo

Vid related