if carrying a gun with a round chambered and no manual safety is the ONLY safe way to carry one, how come stories like this keep popping up?
http://archive.is/jWmS8
Why are there threads almost every month here about NDs?
>hurrr people r stupid
Well then maybe if that's a given they shouldn't be carrying with a round chambered,
>>33643083
>>33643083
>Well then maybe if that's a given they shouldn't be carrying with a round chambered,
If they can't abide by basic safety rules, they shouldn't have a gun. Period.
Also, the article makes no mention of what type of gun it was. It could have been a glock, could have been a 1911. We don't know. Could have also been a shitty holster. Could have been like pic related, which can happen with a manual safety as well if he forgot to flag the safety before holstering.
And besides, carrying unchambered is retarded because having to take time to porperly load your weapon in a situation where you mean it is a bad idea..
Because you don't hear of the literal millions of times people successfully carry a gun without nding on the news daily.
Stupid people have always been around and always will, get over it
>>33643083
>he carries condition 3
>he is scared of his gun
>he believes he will be able to see trouble coming
>he thinks he will have both hands available or be able to rack the gun on his belt while being jerked around in a fight the same as he can standing still on the range
>he was taught to do so in the military but does not understand the reason for it or the differences between what they were doing in the military and CCW.
>>33643083
we had this bait thread like 3 days ago Jesus Christ fuck off
Condition 0 is not idiot safe.
People are idiots.
They will fuck up.
But it's the most prepared condition and fastest to fire from.
I don't carry a round chamber cuz muh kids. They literally get into everything, not worth the risk.
Chamber fags can suck it. The only situation u need one in the chamber is if someone is on you already with a handgun, in which case it's a roll of the dice anyways.
I'm now convinced that there is a shill behind the recent string of empty chamber.
To what purpose?
>>33643316
Galco are not considered shitty holsters.
The problem with your Glock example and then saying "it can happen to a gun with a safety if you forget the safety" is that in situation A) You only have to do one thing wrong and in situation B) You have to do 2 things wrong.
So B is far less likely.
>>33643526
No one likes you or your wife's boyfriends children.
>>33643528
>>33643539
Galco makes both shitty and good holsters.
>>33643558
Possible, but I think it's something else. You can see the marxists a mile away, this is a more subtle troll.
>>33643686
Maybe they are evolving?
>>33643526
>chamber fags can suck it because I'm too weak of a man to manage my own offspring.
Maybe you should go out for a pack of smokes and never return so that your kids can be raised by your more masculine, more intelligent replacement.
>>33643816
T. beta cuck
>>33643484
True
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=0FXHVjXPtJk
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=rVPiic-ELoM
>>33643850
How am I the beta cuck? You're the one that's been cucked into a horrible concealed carry practice because your wife's kids manhandle you and can shoot you with your own gun.
>>33643083
IN FOR waiting for noguns OP to post a picture of himself carrying a gun.
I'm carrying a CZ75 at half cock. No safety engaged
>>33643083
The only true safety is between your ears, sir.
>>33644115
What a chubby fucking faggot
>>33644115
always muckin about
>>33644499
>>33644066
ditto, though mine has the decocker and not the safety
>not edc a single action revolver with hammer down on an empty chamber