What would be the reaction and retalion of USA if North Korea

>>33606397
Nuclear war.

>>33606412
Would USA be willing to risk more citizens being killed and injured just to get revenge by nuclear weapons?

>>33606397
remember desert storm?....korea storm pacific bugaloo. then a decade plus long FUBAR of westernizing the norks and unbrainwashing them as well as dealing with loyalist kim remnants and mass famine/poverty

>>33606397
North Korea would be wiped off the map. Hopefully China and the rest of California, too.

>>33606417
Yes.
100%.

>>33606420
I belive USA would not use weapons of mass destruction and would stick to conventional weapons.

A nuclear strike to US soil would push the nation into long depression.

>>33606397
South Corea would become a island over night
And btw. it would be a NATO article 5 case so England and France would also be obligatet to nuke the shit out of Kim
Also things that will never happen

>>33606397
What did San Dimas ever do to anyone?

>>33606480
Why do you think they would kill Nork civilians for the heck of it? Guaranteed a lot of military shit would be nuked by the appropriate yield. No fucking city nuking by massive warheads.

There is also the need to limit fallout to China, SK, Russia and Japan.

>>33606397
>LA.
We would probably thank them

>>33606526
They hit civilians so we can too. Total war nigga.
People are pussies these days. Hell, personally I'd be pissed if less than half there population wasn't exterminated.

>>33606417
>More citizens
>Los Angeles California
>American citizens

I'm ok with cucks getting nuked. No need for retaliation.

>>33606546
This

>>33606526
I mean as much shit you want to say about LA bunch of innocents probably die horribly of cancer and or get vaporized without them knowing. So I doubt a few brainwashed gooks would matter.

>>33606397
It'd justify a Trident or 2.
Bye bye Pyongyang.

>>33606526
>There is also the need to limit fallout to China, SK, Russia and Japan.
Fallout is a total meme
Just use H-bombs, they have nearly no fallout compare to their boom

>>33606397
Well if they hit LA can they hit San Francisco as well?

t. California resident

>>33606397
Can someone point me towards north korea's kickstarter?

We need to make this shit happen

>>33606397
It wouldn't hit. There's a big technology gap between the US and NK, it would be intercepted well in advance. Then, the US and China would figure out that it was a nuke - and within 5-7 days NK would be completely liberated. New puppet regime to provide a buffer for China, and we restart the cycle, but they'll try and put someone in place who doesn't regularly threaten with nuclear war.

>>33606684
>Wanting gay zombies.

>>33606640
Don't you know there's a Keter class stored there you retard? We'd have to give them time to evacuate it to Greenland.

>>33606744
>implying gays are a threat, even when undead

>>33606489
YOU SHALL BE REVENGED

>>33606555
Be careful not to cut yourself on that edge.

File: 1410820251042.webm (733KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

733KB, 480x360px

Why doesnt the US just arm a few B-52s with cheeseburgers and foodbomb the shit out of NK?
Two thirds of their army would happily surrender

I don't think there would be a big war involving the US if this happened. If NK launched a nuke China would immediately zerg rush NK with their entire military to topple Kim and remove the pretext for a US invasion. China would probably execute Kim on live TV to satisfy America's desire for revenge and then rule NK directly.

>>33606397
why LA and not SF?

>>33606397

No more North Korea.

Doesn't matter because NK can't nuke LA.

>>33606759
You know how long the parades will take when they shamble?

>>33606684

Yes.

>>33606808

Well LA has the advantage about being a giant contiguous blob of city. If you're a few klicks off-target on SF, your nuke might just end up in the Bay.

>>33606862
SF is a dense as fuck city with arguably more wealth and tech centers to destroy easily.

Hell one fire killed like 36 libtards in Oakland. I'd bet nuclear fire combined with a useless and hyper white collar population unable to cope would do faaaar more damage both economically and perhaps even casualtywise if aimed in the right place.

>>33606923

>NK MIssiles
>Aim

Very funny tough guy.

>>33606397
>LA
Nothing of value would be lost.

>>33606923

Yeah anon, but aiming is the problem.

>>33606412

That's a lil harsh. It is Cali after all, not like any thing of value was lost.

>>33606939
is LA that bad?

>>33606397
At least one nuked on Pyongyang as retaliation followed by Korean War 2: Electric Boogaloo.

>>33606397
Serious answer, full scale invasion including but not limited to deploying our own nukes. I would think our goal would be to shut down the Kim regime as quick as possible to halt any chance at further attacks.

>>33606963
Im sure they can achieve 5km CEP

File: 1436734709602.webm (3MB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1024x576px

>>33606546
>>33606563
>>33606568
>>33606684
>>33606939

They may be cucks, but they are still fellow Americans. No one gets to drop a nuke on US soil and survive.

North Korea gets reduced to a radioactive cinder.

>>33606555
>>33606785
But that's kind of how ROE works. Granted, wars of extermination are logistically unsound, but "civilized war" works due to an extension of the norm of reciprocity. The first one to pop the cork on non-conventional arms should expect proportional retaliation.

Hence: >>33607050

Call it a war of liberation. It'll make better propaganda.

>>33607050
I'm imagining a skeletal MacArthur kicking open his casket at Norfolk to finally settle accounts.

>>33606417
Being that we went to war and nation building over a single building, absolutely.

America always retaliated. Politically we can't afford to. We're the biggest dog, can't have some little bitch bully us.

>>33606397
Wow, that blast radius is actually really sad.

If they dropped it on LAX it probably wouldn't even hit any residential areas.

>>33606397
>18,860 fatalities

Casualties and losses
Hiroshima:
20,000+ soldiers killed
70,000–146,000 civilians killed
Nagasaki:
39,000–80,000 killed
Total: 129,000–246,000+ killed

pretty tame

Celebration.

>>33606397
Beaded glass.

>>33606397
I'd cheer NK on

>>33606806
This is pretty plausible. Minus the live TV execution.
China would not want an american led puppet regime ruling over NK just two steps from their backyard.

>>33606793
Mostly because China is still their ally on paper

>>33606431
If LA were hit with a nuke and it was confirmed from the Norks, any response less than obliterating every organism on Nork soil would result in DC being burned to the ground by foaming at the mouth pissed off americans.

I dont like Los Angelas, the kikes that control it, the disgusting mindless drivel it shovels on the world, or the influence it peddles on national policy, but I will be straight goddamned if I let another country mass kill American citizens and engage in an act of war upon us and not feel the wrath of hell in response.

I still think that we should sneak attack the Saudis for 9/11

>>33606420
>decade

we are still in the mid east and will be there for the rest of ever.

to unfuck the norks would take at least 3 generations, but we'd probably bomb it, claim what we want, occasionally send some pallets of MREs and let the chinks turn it into a giant refugee/concentration camp

>>33606563
Not all the whites living there are cucks, but their votes get buried by the immigrants

>>33607710
>I still think that we should sneak attack the Saudis for 9/11
My Nigger. I've been fantacizing a strategy where we use a few MEUs to sieze and nationalize their oil assets as a fuck you. No nation building, no brown people inside the perimeter, let em keep their useless desert.

File: 1370675466589.png (74KB, 1162x850px) Image search: [Google]

74KB, 1162x850px

>>33607739

>>33607756
>t. cuck

>>33606397
>Estimated fatalities:
>18,860
>Estimated injuries:
>63,530
what the fuck, wouldn't a nuke do a lot more considering it's hitting one of the most densely populated areas in the country?

>>33606397
>L.A.

Thank them.

>>33606397
I would be pissed that a nuke in LA only killed 18,860 illegal immigrants and libtards... there is 20 million people living in the Los Angeles area

>>33606757
>le SCP.
>>>/reddit/

>>33606397
A large thank you, and then nuclear war

File: NCR.jpg (1MB, 1521x1200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1521x1200px

>>33607264
This. Even liberals are fellow Americans. I know they will bleed for you if you are ever in danger. Even the most liberals will fight on your side.

>>33606412
>wiping out los Angeles
Estimated casualties:
Nothing of value

>>33608319
Meant for >>33606397

>>33606923
To be fair, that fire happened in a fire inspector's nightmare of a building. The stairs leading to a floor was diy of flammable junk, it wasn't even real stairs.

>>33608325
meant for >>33608319

>>33607791

wat

>implying the norks could even hit hawaii, let alone the west coast

>>33608315
May have been true 15 years ago. Not today

>>33606397
Media would go crazy that it was Trump's fault

>>33608315

Given the very divided society of now, I'm starting to doubt that. We'll just hope that the other side dies more from nukes.

File: 1474869091092.jpg (92KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

92KB, 400x400px

no more free porn

US are in full cuck mode.

>>33608398
Yeah.
Both side been cuked.

>>33606397

sadness because it wouldn't be enough to return this state to greatness.

>>33606555
It would honestly be easier to just kill them all. 30 million brainwashed refugees is not easy to deal with.

>>33608416
>begin war with north
>china gets cucked with 30 million refugees syria style

>>33608416

That's China's problem.

Can we give them coordinates for Detroit instead I'm not particularly fond of la but I pick up at the ports for my job... That would just make traffic horrendous

>>33607756
See, but there would be little murder my way. We go in and sieze all of the oil fields, pipelines, terminals, etc. If there are civillians living near the oil infrastructure, they are evicted. We don't even try to occupy any population centers. Only our people, good Haliburton labor, work inside of the perimeter around the oil resources. If the Saudi military moves against us, they just get BRRRRRTed in the open desert and left to rot. We don't try to overthrow the government, or install our own puppets; we just pump all of the oil out and tell the rest of the world they are buying it from us now. When it's gone, we leave.

>>33608350
Meant for>>33608350

File: IMG_2981.png (31KB, 300x162px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 300x162px

>>33608471
>saudi abrams
>vulnerable to BRRRRRRRT

File: s.jpg (24KB, 432x325px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 432x325px

>>33608416

>brainwashed
>risks life to leave

>>33608474
meant for >>33608325

>>33606717
Your assuming it's a missile. Could be man portable transported by spy's. Honestly that seems like the best way for them to do it. Maybe there's already one there.

>>33608485
If that's the only hole in my plan, I'll take it. I'm sure there is plenty in the US arsenal to kill export Abrams tanks, I've seen plenty die in Syria.

>>33606420
North Korea doesn't have a religion to cling to and motivate people to blow themselves up for the cause. No long guerrila war to speak of.

File: nato-nuclear-bomb.jpg (614KB, 1289x1965px) Image search: [Google]

614KB, 1289x1965px

>>33606397

In my opinion the reaction would be the following:

Nuclear strikes against the DPRK:
The US would be forced to retaliate with nuclear weapons, if they don't the whole concept of deterrence would fall apart.
But unlike most posters in this thread i don't think the US would erradicate the entire country or strike cities, i think they would most likely use tactical nukes to eliminate nork artillery along the dmz and to destroy large concentrations of nork armed forces.
Of course this would be accompanied by a huge air campaign.

Land Offensive:
The US would invoke Article 5, the ensuing NATO-South Korean Alliance would sweep the country within months.

File: 1488481885763.jpg (31KB, 528x960px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 528x960px

How is north Korea supposed to deliver this imaginary bomb?

>>33608546
In a shipping container from China.

>>33607803
It would be at best a 20 kt nuke on a city with modern building. Nations like the US use like 250 mt nukes, which is WAY more powerful.

Nukes on Japan were so devastating because their buildings were practically made of matchsticks compared to modern construction.

File: WiC.jpg (30KB, 460x215px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 460x215px

>>33608556

>>33606397
China would have a new sea they could claim after America vaporizes the Norks.

>>33608561
>250mt
>2.5x larger than the theorectial max yield of the Tsar Bomba
>5x larger than the largest nuke ever tested
>10x larger than the most powerful weapon fielded by the USA, ever
>~250x more powerful than the most powerful weapon in the US arsenal (B83)
>500x more powerful than the W87 used in Tridents

Please stop talking out your ass.

>>33608556

Nope, sorry horse shit. I work in the shipping industry and there's not a chance you'd get anything through that's radioactive.

>>33608584
Does it have to leave the ship?

>>33606397

That nuke wouldn't even make it here. You think the trillions of defense budget we've had over the decades aren't capable of stopping one? Regardless we would react as if it hit anyways and NK and anyone associated with them would be fucked.

>>33606862
A hit in the bay would tsunami the waterfront areas of SF, Oakland, and Richmond. That would arguably do more damage than a hit in one of those cities. Assuming, of course, surface burst.

>>33607014
A lot of people, a lot of industry. Random oil wells scattered all over the place.

Depending on the wind, the fallout plume could wind up dusting the San Fernando valley. That's the porn capital of the world.

All of these autists saying nothing of value was lost have apparently never touched themselves before.

>>33608789
I mean, there's plenty of homemade/ cam stuff that is dispersed throughout the country. I can see you would be upset because of the loss of BLACKED.com, but I think most of us will be fine without any more interacial triple anal cuckoldry tranny bukkake scenes.

>>33607321

>over a single building

Poor bastard can't even count to 4....

>>33608527

Also you're not going to get the massive influx foreign fighters like the muzzies did.

Literally no one gives a shit about North Korea or its people. China only intervened in the 50's over fear of an American hegemony.

They know it's not worth the effort this time.

>>33606839
kek

>>33608541
That image is full retard:
>GPS on a nuclear weapon
>X-rays from a fission reaction
>spin-stabilized with fins

Bet they make images like this so that the norks make stupid, unusable bombs when they copy the designs.

>>33606397
You ever watched a Grizzly bear kill a squirrel before?

>>33606939
LA produces a lot of oil. Realistically though, San Jose is a better target. A nuke in a valley like Nagasaki and it's a bigger tech center than SF

File: B61-Project-05_small.jpg (285KB, 1300x867px) Image search: [Google]

285KB, 1300x867px

>>33609137

>That image is full retard

No, it's mostly correct.

The B61-12 does indeed have a JDAM-style gps guidance kit and is spin stabilized as can be seen here:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=qHueMFvw2ss&t=163s

X-Rays are indeed what causes the secondary to go:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=h7vyKDcSTaE

The only thing that is wrong on that pic are that the fusion fuel is lithiumdeuteride and not deuterium and tritium.

>>33606397
nationwide celebration

>>33608541
>parking 50 in Incirlik.
It's like you want to have your airbase surrounded again.

>>33606397
The US would assault the DPRK.
The US would only use nuclear weapons if they felt that another attack was imminant.

If a nuke was ever detonated on US Soil or assets by another sovereign nation the US would be obligated to make a nuclear response, otherwise MAD goes out the window.

File: 1491686554262.jpg (75KB, 681x681px) Image search: [Google]

75KB, 681x681px

>>33606757
or just use more nukes

>>33609458

>cheering the deaths of american citizens by a foreign power, no matter how degenerate they are

disgusting.

>>33606397
Why did you ground burst it?

Detonate that thing in the air damn'it.

>>33608584
>nuh uh, it's impossible

Shut up, if you actually worked the docks, you know full well that we can't check everything, and crap still gets through by the tonne.

If they shielded the thing and had it deep in a stack, no one would get around to it.

>>33606417

Yes. I'm feeling the Furor Teutonicus just reading this.

>>33609506
That info-graphic is probably before the shit show in Turkey happened. Switch Turkey with Romania.

>>33606397
I hope Trump strike NK once and for all, because I am tired of their shit.

File: IMG_2759.jpg (134KB, 776x606px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 776x606px

>>33608527
I'd agree but look at Vietnam, even Japan. And these guys already have already had a life long hatred of the west. Your totally right when it comes to the Mideast, but brainwashed Asain's can be just as hard if not harder to fight. Idk what it is, but they just don't give up.

>>33609056
>They know it's not worth the effort this time.
Well that's what we hope anyway.

>>33608505
They'd have to smuggle it into the U.S. first somehow. I suppose they might by ship and detonate it before they get swept for radioactive material, but that'd bring the death toll down a lot.

>>33608319
Doesn't matter we would still retaliate.

>>33608374
>>33608367
Doesn't matter. Once they hit your country once, you don't want them to do it again.

To all the people saying nothing of value would be lost if LA were nuked:

There is actually one resident of LA who's loss would be worth mourning, the space shuttle Endeavour. After retiring from NASA, she took up residence in the California Science Center. But other than that, you're right.

>>33608789
Fuck that, amateurs the only shit I can jerk off to. You gotta watch those vids of girls jerk off on omegle.

>>33610808
Don't forget the Battleship Iowa.

>>33606397
aw fuck! i got volks there.

NK better chill. dont make me put my boots back on mother fuckers, i will draw dicks all over your part of the pen too.

i hope NK has soju. enough soju and american soldiers can do anything.

>>33610608
Agreed, respect anon.

>>33610700
>Furor Teutonicus
Yes mein Aryan brother

>>33606417
And what's to stop them from using another Nuke if we only do a conventional assault?

>>33610820
I aways thought that was the one in Pearl Harbor.

>>33610881
No that's Missouri, the one the Japanese instrument of surrender was signed on.

>>33610894
Oh ya!! Thanks anon, I grew up in Hawaii an I aways remembered touring one of those ships.

>>33608546
Submarine.

File: rtr3u1y9.jpg (157KB, 1200x799px) Image search: [Google]

157KB, 1200x799px

>>33608546

File: Kim Jong Un - Missle.jpg (85KB, 500x499px) Image search: [Google]

85KB, 500x499px

>>33606397

>That bomb target

If I was Lil Kim, I'd hit Beverly Hills and Hollywood. Nuking inner city people would have less impact then irradiating some rich celebrities.

File: Anime.jpg (89KB, 455x608px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 455x608px

>>33608789

>2017 still fapping to vanilla western porn

Unless you're into blacked cuckoldry vids, they really don't have much to offer.

>>33608584
just needs to get near enought o the coust to fire a missile
>>33608789
mein porno ist deutsch

>>33606397
>Reaction
Celebration
>Retaliation
As if it had hit a city anyone actually likes. We have to keep up appearances after all.

>>33607684
China wouldn't step up to bat for Nork

If you think they'll risk their cozy status quo over a country that no one likes and is constantly causing them problems, then you have another thing coming

>>33606526
1. They nuked a civilian population center as an unprovoked first strike, we have free and clear reign both by codified international law and the court of public opinion to erase their entire country from existence.
2. North Korea doesn't have separate civilian and military infrastructure and all adults of both genders are officially part of their armed forces. We literally COULD NOT retaliate with any military action and hit pure civilian areas, because there aren't any.

>>33606839
No need to stop for them if they're not alive though.

>>33607312
Are you kidding? Curtis Lemay would pop out of his grave boner-first so fast it would create a tear in the fabric of reality.

>>33607803
Norks cannot into airburst, so it would be a ground-burst detonation.

Ground-burst detonations don't have the same potential for destruction as airburst of the same yield does.

20kt is not a particularly large nuke.

Modern building designs aren't as rampantly flammable as 1940's Jap building designs and modern crisis response is both much more capable and much better equipped, there will be no raging firestorm inflicting the majority of the casualties.

LA is hilly as fuck, terrain will block or mitigate a lot of the blast damage as it deflects or stops the shockwave.

>>33608315
That wasn't true even in 1967, it damn sure isn't true now.

>>33608496
>kill leadership and destroy infrastructure
>extremely inhospitable mountainous country with little infrastructure to start with and a population too poor to own automobiles
So...what? They're just gonna walk across the 4th nastiest mountain range in the world to go pester China? Nah. They're gonna sit in their hovels and starve and cry that the US and SK need to feed/clothe/employ them. Kind of like they do now, except they're outright begging instead of begging under the guise of strongarming.

>>33608541
The Norks have all of their military assets in the middle of "cities" because those are the only places that have things like food and electricity. There are literally towns that sprang up around the artillery emplacements on the DMZ, partly to intentionally create a PR nightmare if they're ever fired upon and partially because soldiers are the only ones with anything of value and they attracted camp followers.

There is literally no possible way to use a nuclear device of any size shape or style against North Korea without hitting civilians. And this is entirely intentional on the part of the Norks.

File: at least ten dicks.png (70KB, 232x228px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 232x228px

>>33608304
>wah people aren't allowed to have fun without being from leddit
Kill yourself my man.

>>33610590
Wouldn't recommend that desu

>>33606397
The rest of the US would celebrate and lift all sanctions because LA is shit regardless.

>>33611893
Nobody thinks they would, but it would still be a diplomatic crisis with another nuclear country

>>33606397
dang, I'm right in the fallout shadow.

could they aim farther south a bit?

>>33607710
yes, Islam must die

File: 1474832475902.jpg (193KB, 600x739px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 600x739px

>>33611963
Damn straight.

>>33608304
4chan created SCP, you retard.

File: 1484774542719.jpg (87KB, 790x768px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 790x768px

>>33610608
>LA
>American citizens

Anon..

>>33612077
If the US is resorting to nukes then collateral damage is no longer a concern. If the nuke was delivered by ICBM, then first priority is destruction of all known or suspected nuke launch sites and command and control centers prevent future launches.

>>33608561
>250 mt
Are you drunk?

>>33606397
jubilation

File: ffa501668e70ffd5ff8296210497c295.jpg (5KB, 236x236px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 236x236px

>>33613277
>>33609458
>>33611539
>>33606546
Cheering the death of American citizens.
Fucking traitors.

>>33607264
>>33614332

>Liberals are Americans

>>33606397
praise fat kid for killing those fags and beaners

>>33614406
Yes they are. We don't like it but they are.

>>33606417
Yes

>>33606397
LA is pretty densely packed, so if a Nork nuke only did that many casualties, then they cant even make nukes correctly

>>33613277
>>33614406

>hurr durr i don't like them so they're not americans

disgusting.

>>33606397
>US goes to war over four buildings being knocked down by dunecoons
>NorKs nuke LA

Salting the earth wouldn't be off the table

File: 1465886215474.png (448KB, 646x815px) Image search: [Google]

448KB, 646x815px

I hope we topple that fat gook.

Norks need to go.

File: IMG_1072.jpg (55KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 640x480px

How could anyone POSSIBLY smuggle something dangerous into the US?

File: IMG_1073.jpg (177KB, 1600x900px) Image search: [Google]

177KB, 1600x900px

>>33614516
Are you dense?
They're explaining to you that the people who live in downtown LA are LITERALLY not American citizens.

>>33606397
We'd probably celebrate.
And then send a single Spirit to Pyongyang.

>>33607264
but can't we turn a blind eye just this once?

>>33606563
I agree. We'd retaliate in principle BUT i wouldn't bat an eye really.

>>33608584
really?

http://abcnews.go.com/WNT/story?id=129321

>>33606420
I volunteer to "westernize" at least three cute Nork girls.

>>33606971
Came here to say this. No actual Americans were harmed.

File: notjustwaterfilters.png (2MB, 960x718px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 960x718px

>>33606417
Any nuclear strike must be met with an overwhelming nuclear retaliation in order to prevent the normalization of nuclear warfare.

File: 830.jpg (23KB, 499x375px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 499x375px

>>33614852
>(Boyle heights not so much)
Top kek, can confirm

File: tea girl.jpg (16KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 480x360px

>>33606397
>What would be the reaction and retalion of USA if North Korea struck Los Angeles with 20kt nuclear weapon?
Tea Girl will die in the war, and that's a future I can't imagine living in.

>>33608584

What this guy says >>33608646 don't bother of taking the bomb off the boat. Just get the ship docked all nice and comfy then set it off. If you're on the east side of the LA Docks you can pretty much take Long Beach out.

>>33606397
>NK nukes LA
>Kim Jong Ill: "yes, i haz a nuked de unibed stated. Dey wib fear me now"
>like, a week
>kimmy steps put of his rickety ass palace
>ohhh, ruts dis?
>a note, ensribed on it is simply "to Kim, love Washington. "
>he opens it
>it just simply says "thanks, friendo"
>kim goes nuts, nukes SF
>a week
>"dear kim, we ask that you nuke oakland next, as this is now the worst city on tge west coast, love washington"
>kim gives up
Thats how i'd like to think it would go down.

>>33615026
comfy af

>>33608789
I've never touched myself before and I think Californians are people too.

>>33614989
Didn't a Nork on /pol/ confirm that she died at least four years ago?

File: SAINT-GERMAIN-CHELA-PICTURE.jpg (10KB, 234x313px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 234x313px

>>33606397

>>33606417
Yes.

The US would nuke North Korea. What else needs to be said?

>>33606489
YOUR WATERPARK WAS OVERPRICED

>>33608789
>norks nuke leftists and porn centers
>consevative whites take over the country and begin breeding like crazy now that degeneracy and abortion become a lot harder
>take over the liberal purged coasts and truly make america great again
>manifest destiny 2.0 begins, worldwide edition.

>>33607264
haters of the USA are not americans

>>33606397
south korea would become an island.

>>33615250
it's true, Idiocracy wasn't just a movie, but a prediction

>>33606417
I don't get the question.

What's the other option? Surrender to Best Korea? Just sort of ignore it, and hope it doesn't happen again?

>>33606397

Obvious first response would be to leave Pyongyang glowing in the dark and probably pop one or two in whatever area the pudgy little shit is believed to be hiding in.

After that there would be the endless "Never forget" shit for years after while we pretend that anything that makes that shit hole smaller is a bad thing.

But yeah, New York and Boston are already "National Martyr Cities" that wear their attacks on their chest like medals. We don't need another one, least of all one in Southern California.

Also the Chargers probably go back to San Diego. Pelosi gets some kind of nuke ban passed in California that nobody cares about because it's a futile, unenforceable gesture.

Unless we get lucky and she happens to be there. I guess then it would still get passed and some liberal would name it after her.

commiefornians are enemies of Americans. More so thank norks since they are already inside our borders.

>>33606397
Despite what we may tell you about how bad California is, we'd would still immediately retaliate and nuke North Korea.

After all, we have a lot of damn money and trade going in and out of the state.

If there's one thing American's hate more than anything else in the world, it would be losing money.

File: 08842dc8191cba6d0e7cedf3cedb042f_1307809861001png-meme-feels-good_1162-850.png (77KB, 1162x850px) Image search: [Google]

77KB, 1162x850px

>>33615477
>Pelosi at ground zero of a nuke attack she enabled

>>33608304
BEGONE, NEWFAG

>>33607673
they are more against a unified korea there is some really deep seeded racial issues there.

>>33606397
>wiping commiefornia off the face of the map
honestly we should thank them.

>>33606397
>Not nuking Koreatown
One job OP

>>33610748
Then again, look at Vietnam and especially Japan. We had some brutal wars with them, they were brainwashed for years to hate the US, but now they are relatively pro-US.

The US doesnt get nearly enough credit for our propaganda machine.

>>33615250
You do realise that by making abortions harder to get, poor black and mexican people breed faster, right?

You want to give them abortions and birth control to reduce their breeding rate for your white-America fantasy land. I'm not even a white supremacist and this seems obvious to me.

Well it looks like you have gotten real answers and meme answers OP.

File: 1490943588717.jpg (100KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1280x720px

>this thread
>calling for massive death and what essentially amounts to the genocide of innocent civilians because their oppressive dictator let his autistic rage get the better of him

Let me guess, the deaths of North Koreans are excusable because they're "gooks" or "yellow monkeys" or some other wartime term you can use to sound cool and grizzled right?

Pathetic. Blood for blood? What a load of shit. You guys are spouting nothing but a bunch of pseudo-patriotism. You say at the end of the day we are all Americans and the North Koreans must be made to pay for the deaths of your countrymen, yet you wish nothing but ill will and misfortune upon those same "libtards" in every other thread because they disagree with you politically. It's obvious you don't actually care about the potential loss of life or your fellow countrymen. You just want to seem tough and patriotic in response to a hypothetical question on a Nepalese pottery sculpting forum so you can fit in with your fellow posters. This board really is just a bunch of cosplayers desperately trying to fulfill some misguided fantasy huh?

>>33618123
Here's a (You) for effort

>>33617653

They think better of the US than Australia ATM.

>>33608527
Actually... they kinda do. They've got the religion of the Kim family that's been enforced since the 50s through military rule, fear and the fact no one outside the country (military officers excluded most likely) fucking knows any better. They've been raised for the last... gow knows how many.. 3.. 4 generations that everyone outside north korea has it worse and that north korea is the pinnacle of technology and military might. It would be basically like fighting a shitty malnourished and lesser equipped version of the korps of krieg. Even if you brought full on proof that everything they fought for was false they'd likely fight on because they have no idea what the fuck they're seeing and will cling to what is "normal" and fight on.

>>33615014
You are better off with a dirty bomb in that scenario. Way easier to make, sea breeze will do all of the work for you.

>>33606397
I mean, if they targeted L.A. we should probably send a thank you card

>>33617653
Hell Japan is out there asking to join us in our naval campaign to the Korean peninsula. Japan might be more pro-US than the US. But that's what happens when you overthrow a corrupt government, give power back to the people and jump-start their economy to basically a world power.

File: cb.png (461KB, 476x489px) Image search: [Google]

461KB, 476x489px

>20kt

Holy shit, Los Angeles is huge.

>>33608789
>implying all my porn isn't animated and from the land of the rising sun
wew
e
w

>>33610590
That'll only piss it off you semen-guzzling tard

Only 18860?
That's disappointing

>>33620136
LA is used as a classic example of Urban sprawl and shit planning

>>33614777
trips of nuke carrying spics
I just hope it detonates far enough away from me, being in OC. Also hope they bring a second one for San Francisco

>>33620356
Hopefully it kills you Calicucks as well. Every dollar you contribute allows California to continue sucking ass. If you and other productive members moved out then California would collapse under its own bloated welfare weight

>>33614777
Pretty sure the cartels are going to murder the ever-loving shit out of anyone trying to fuck with their largest market.

>>33620382
jokes on you, I leave next month

File: IMG_0157.jpg (16KB, 320x180px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 320x180px

>>33618143
What a fantastic defense and rebuttal of my claims. You sure got me anon, you sure got me.

File: IMG_0723.jpg (60KB, 479x498px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 479x498px

>>33620402
>>33620382
>>33620356
>all this butthurt about california

Kek, pic related

>>33614332
>commies
>americans
Wew lad
e
w
l
a
d

>>33606397
>What would be the reaction and retalion of USA if North Korea struck Los Angeles with 20kt nuclear weapon?
Anyone who nukes LA deserves a medal in my book

>>33608319
>Keanu Reeves
>Clint Eastwood
>Other actors I like
>American global cultural hegemony

We can replace San Francisco and the Silicon Valley, there are tech startups all over the US that would love to be the next big thing but existing firms have ridiculous inertia and influence and no real competition.

I mean, I'd rather keep LA than SF, plus we'd see ten times the faggotry wiped out, and I'm not talking about LGBT.

>>33606417
Anyone who nukes the US signs the death warrant of their entire civilization. This has been policy since the 50s.

Threads like this make me sad that Oppenheimer left us. All those thread he did, trying to educate idiots like the people in this thread, nothing. He couldn't hold back the tidal wave of stupidity.

File: lgm_30_minuteman_hist_2.jpg (33KB, 300x374px) Image search: [Google]

33KB, 300x374px

>>33606397
>Commiefornia.
Honestly I wouldn't mind if we just let bygones be bygones. In reality though, I think it would be justifiable to send them back a megaton.

>>33606397
>struck Los Angeles with 20kt nuclear weapon?
Joy? Parades? Dancing in the streets?

>>33618123
>fellow countrymen

Said people want to disparage people like me. They can turn their own damn cheeks.

>>33607264
>they are still fellow Americans.
The demographics of LA say otherwise

File: 1490452514209.gif (1MB, 250x250px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 250x250px

>>33606717
How good is the US at detecting ICBM and short range missles? Specific examples if possible

>>33614777
Saguaro cacti, so southern arizona, not california.
Desert is enough of a defense against most things down there.

>>33606489
Your high school football team doesn't rule!!!

File: 1491667840064.gif (982KB, 285x171px) Image search: [Google]

982KB, 285x171px

>>33606417
Remeber on sept. 9 2001, they blew up 2 building. Two. Fucking. Buildings.

How did we react?

We blew up 2 countries. Two. Whole. Fucking. Countries. And that was with the kiddie gloves on.

A nuclear strike on soverign US soil would unleash a maelstrom of death, destruction, and carnage unseen before by the likes of man. Every man, women, and possibly child would recivie a generous dose of lead, high explosives, shrapnel, and radation.

The ROK would be a Island in the pacific and both the PRC and Russia will be left with holding their limp dicks in their hands.

On a side note all of the "cant beat rice farmers/goatfuckers with AKs" memes will finally come to an end.

The stated actions of the United States and its military would be to eliminate any future nuclear threat from NoK to the United States or any other nation. The US would make it clear that whatever level of military involvement required to reduce the threat level to precisely zero would be used.

If Kim decided to execute his top military leadership, hand his nukes and all equipment over to the US directly, and hang himself in the town square, we'd call it a day. If not, we'd take care of all of those things for him.

Would there be 'collateral damage'? Sure. But it would be framed in the context of destroying the nuclear threat of an uncontrolled madman in NoK.

Ironically, the uncontrolled madman in the US whitehouse would be making these decisions.

>>33617701
not if theyre deported :^)

>>33606397
>What would be the reaction and retalion of USA if North Korea struck Los Angeles with 20kt nuclear weapon?
relief that nobody has to deal with retards migrating from LA to normal states

>>33606417

It's not simple revenge. Any country that decides it's a good idea to start a nuclear conflict needs to be neutralized as quickly as possible. The prevailing doctrine of nuclear war is to destroy the enemy's ability to wage nuclear war - the destruction of nuclear launch sites, weapons, command and control. Civilian centers aren't typically the highest priority targets unless they are also the sites of any of the targets previously mentioned.

>>33606397
In a perfect world, we wouldn't react if NK nuked LA. Instead, we'd give them a thank you letter in return. Instead, we'll probably end up nuking them in retaliation

>>33629537
you do know there are more conservatives in LA than there are in Wyoming, Montana, Alaska, and North Dakota combined, with West Virgina and their cousin-fuckers thrown in for good measure. Its a big fucking city.

>>33615026
>not nuking Berkeley, Sacramento, or Seattle
Oakland is nowhere near as bad as either of those three

>>33606397
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=t8RCQDDsMpU

America would go ape shit and take the world over.

>>33629492
>relief that nobody has to deal with retards migrating from LA to normal states

Funny you should mention that. Right around 10% of the population of LA is native-born. You fuckers let your tards wander around loose and they kept going until an ocean stopped them. Now there's a shitload of them, and they've taught each other how to tard vote.

Quit letting your tards out, and things like California won't happen. You have nobody to blame except yourselves.

>>33623728
He still posts as anon.

I feel nothing. Commie on commie violence.

>>33611998
But what about all the toxic burning plastics that replaced wood products in the past 70 years?
I wonder if anyone has considered the materials effects tests of the 50's redone in simulation with the shit ton of plastic and oil based products we now use.
The fires may be less with concrete and steel/glass towers. But man, when the fires start, it would be cyanide city.
Something that people don't realize is that an airburst of a megaton device can actually set asphalt on fire. Now there is a crowd pleaser. A few square miles of burning asphalt, ignites cars, plastic cabs, and the fuck ton of paper just blown out of the skyscrapers.
After the precursor wave and windstorm blender effect dies down, you would still have hot, smokey plastic, tires on fire, etc..
How would one account for that?
It's not like we are going to build a modern "nuke town" in the Nevada desert and pop off a 10-3800 kiloton device..

I agree, the space-time would rip open, and Curtis LeMay would turn both missile silo keys in spectral form himself.

>>33608546
I suppose the NK buy a Chinese shipping container ship and make a short range pop up missile come from a disguised batch of containers. A scud, ranged for a few hundred miles could lob a heavy, clunky nuke only a few miles towards the target.
Theoretically, a low angle deflection shot using all the solid fuel to get a coastal town from say 20-50 miles out is possible .

>>33631334
>set asphalt on fire.

True. It's not a sustainable combustion because the thermal pulse doesn't hang around to continuously gasify the petroleum in the asphalt. The heat from burning asphalt isn't enough to keep the process going. For that matter, the thermal pulse doesn't have the duration to put enough energy deep enough into asphalt to reliably ensure ignition. Streets and parking lots are laid down on the ground, which is one helluva heat sink.

The heat potential is there, the duration is not.

As far as structural and architectural plastics/synthetics, those are designed to not sustain combustion. They'll burn as long as there's another heat and fuel source, but they're not a stand alone fuel source. Browse the UBC and NFPA pubs to find the volumes of rules and guidelines that regulate flammability and allowable flame propagation rates in building materials.

There will be fires. They'll come from preexisting ignition sources. There will not be firestorms.

>>33606397
>18k fatalities

That seems awfully low for a nuke blast in a city

>>33632187
That's just from the blast. Figure that many people die immediately. Some percentage of the injured will also die, minutes, hours, or days after the blast. Radiation cases fall into this category.

More people will die from secondary causes in the following week or so- unrelated issues causing mortality due to lack of first responders or medical providers. Also, stupid shit. People panicking, other people chimping.

I wouldn't be surprised if the casualty count hits 6 digits within a month.

>>33614332
Sorry, the constitution do not allow animals to be citizens. Let their bodies hit the floor.

File: clinton archipelago.jpg (118KB, 1600x952px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 1600x952px

>>33614332
Why would I feel sorry for a city full of people who think that chopping the cock and balls of off a healthy boy and sending him to school is okay? Or giving faggots the legal power to liquidate any small business that won't cater their sham marriage? Or disenfranchises me by engaging in human smuggling on a grandiose scale, and even gives the illegals drivers licenses and registers them to vote? That is okay with all of this Orwellian horseshit but will cheerfully send a SWAT team to murder me in my own home over the wrong kind of inanimate object? one that is Constitutionally protected and may have been okay LAST year, but this year will get me ventilated by Der Staat?

Fuck the Hillary Archipelago and all who sail in it. All the civic virtue has been beaten out of me with a shovel.

>>33608527
>North Korea doesn't have a religion to cling to

He hasn't heard of Juche

>>33629603
>LA population: 3.884 million
>Wyoming population: 584,153
>Montana population: 1.024 million
>Alaska population: 736,732
>North Dakota population: 739,482
>Total (without West Virginia): 3.084 million
I'll be fair and say maybe half a million of those 'flyover' state residents are liberal. Yeah, I'm sure that around 2.5 million of those los angles cucks are conservatives.

Califags are cancer. Get nuked.

>>33620347
I have heard that Urban sprawl in the US was encouraged as a deliberate anti-nuke measure.

>>33632917
That 3.884 is only the technical city of LA, the Greater LA Area has close to 20 million. Most counties other than LA (OC, Riverside, San Bernardino) lean right, too. I can't find 2016 numbers but 2.1 mil voted GOP in 2012.

Let's also not forget that not far away from the GLAA lies Camp Pendleton, and just south of that is San Diego, the home of the Pacific Fleet and an extremely Republican county.

>>33606397
That is a EXTREMELY conservative estimate.
The DPRK can AT MINIMUM do 30kt yields and can probably do much higher (probably around 100kt. Yields are purposely limited to prevent collateral damage and to conserve limited precious weapons grade nuclear material). In addition to this they can GREATLY increase casualties by using a salted bomb design.

>>33623690
The DPRK wouldnt use the nuclear option unless they were facing invasion anyways. That is how a deterrent works. IE i go down i'm taking you with me.

>>33606397
The real question is how we get the norks to hit San Francisco with a second one

File: 1492097016944.jpg (41KB, 550x512px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 550x512px

>>33632753
How many years will it take before you realize that no one on this board values any opinions you have and only uses you as a convenient retard to occasionally laugh at.

>>33608437
What's to say China doesn't just let the US take 3/4 of the territory and the refugees whilst making bank of the supplier of the restructuring of the country.

>>33632917
LA area population is 18 million.
if 25% are conservative, then 4.5M conservatives in LA area.

3 million total in flyoverville.

Fuck off.

File: bk2reddit.png (41KB, 302x404px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 302x404px

>>33614332
>wants to turn America into mexistan
>calls other Americans traitors

>>33606397

>commies nuking commies

>>33614332
Mexicans are not Americans you fucking idiot.

>>33608505
radiation would kill the carrier of the bomb before they reach the continent...
or maybe that's not how radiation works.

>>33606397
nothing of value was lost

>>33628959
Beat me to it.

File: 1490509049928.png (218KB, 501x521px) Image search: [Google]

218KB, 501x521px

>>33606397

>>33606757
Just move it to Myanmar

>>33607204

One would hope, anyway.

>>33608761

Fair point.

File: t.jpg (38KB, 573x239px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 573x239px

>>33618123

Satania is the cutest.

>>33617653
>The US doesnt get nearly enough credit for our propaganda machine.
I don't think it was propaganda that led Vietnam to become US friendly. I think "not being China" had a lot more to do with it.

File: image.jpg (8KB, 219x187px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 219x187px

>all these people trying to imply a single nuke from North Korea would not only reach CONUS but also not get hit by our Patiot and other defense systems in Japan and along our coasts and other ships in the pacific
this thread is ridiculous
It would never happen
It's not even worth entertaining

>>33617653

>The US doesnt get nearly enough credit for our propaganda machine.
Actually, we get hundreds of billions of dollars per year in credit for it.

>>33636887

Indeed.

>>33607321
IT WAS TWO, MOTHERFUCKER

NEVER
FORGET

>>33637154
>not at least hoping for some of the west-coast cancer being wiped off the map in the way that makes the US look "good"

>>33637228
Two plus one third building that randomly collapsed. What was up with that?

>>33637290

JET

>>33637269
Oh, I'm all about that
But there's three levels of defense added on top of the Norks severe incompetence when it comes to ballistic missiles
It's a fever dream for us
And a delusion that any psychologist would love to analyze if they got their hands on Kim Jong Un

File: 1492121818586.jpg (7KB, 320x220px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 320x220px

>>33606397

I'll just leave this

>>33606417
North korea would look like one big salt flat within an hour

Only with molten radioactive glass instead of salt

>>33606397
Meh... It's just Commiefornia. Nobody important died.

Northern California tipping the scale to trump in 2020.

>>33640008
California voted 2:1 for Clinton. There's no way California will go red, and especially not because of northern California. There's no one up there to vote.

>>33606397
Id give them a hearty handshake and tell them to finish the rest of the state off

>>33606808
SF is basically already destroyed. There's also not that many people living in SF really. There's more in the east bay or San Jose.

>>33640327
Which is exactly why we need to keep containing all that shit in CA. More screaming libs here won't make any difference as long as we have the electoral college.

>>33607264
As someone who lives in California..
I hate the people .
Most suck at driveing and parking
Most are assholes who only think of them selfs. All the immigrants who fuck up the place with even worse driveing then us.

The only upside i find is talking with all the vets and all the guys i know who are signing up for military positions . plus a few surplus store's sell body plates
>I still hate most Californians

>>33640327
100k dead liberals, the rest of LA would be prowar. them plus northern Cali = trump win

>>33618123

I think people are responsible for the actions of their leader to some degree.

>>33631903
This. Modern cities are kinda designed not to firestorm. Not to mention building codes in LA are even sturdier due to earthquake preparedness regulations. Short of the stuff directly at ground zero youd probably not even see a hell of a lot of damage to structures beyond scorching and windows blown out.

LA, San Diego, and San Fran are all inadvertantly designed to withstand a nuclear strike better that your average city because of all the earthquake saftey regulations. Theyve already been prepping for a big catastrophic hit to the infrastructure and beefed everything up.

>>33606397
Cheering, followed by the removal of North Korea from the planet.

>>33640462
This
I live in LA and will hopefully move outta this shithole in less than 2 years. I love the city but the people here are just a bunch of whiny, spoiled, pussy liberals who have the mindset of sheep. Just the amount of stupidity that goes around makes me think NK nuking the place would be a win-win situation; we get rid of the liberals and NK.