whats a comparable optic in the magnification range or the M145

g8 b8 m8

>>33569139
How is that b8? They really are outdated.
Not op btw>>33569139

File: Military_and_LE.jpg (67KB, 992x709px) Image search: [Google]

67KB, 992x709px

>>33568893
Browse BCO

4x32, automatic variable brightness, variety other than Chevron, different colors.

It's like the Acog but better

>>33569988
Browe* not browse

any 3x reticle

Is there a quality low magnification sight out there that doesnt look like ass?

>>33568893
Translation:
>does anyone know of any cheap optics that look like an ACOG, I really want an ACOG but I cant afford one.

File: IMG_1678.jpg (36KB, 391x366px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 391x366px

>>33569988
Yeah no, looks and feels like a Chinese rip off and cost more then a acog?

>>33571894
Price isn't the problem, I can safely spend $2,000. I do want an ACOG I have, like I said before, just heard they were outdated for what they are, and more modern optics have more features for the same price.
Much like the gentleman that posted >>33569988

>>33572003
Carried an acog when my unit first got them. Once the novelty wore off I swapped it back out for an m68.

It really is an overpriced, overhyped optic. Can't use it for room clearing, can't zoom out etc. It's a lot of fudds buying them because "battle proven!"

Don't buy it. There are tons of other optics out there with better features.

>>33572069
>carried an acog
You're supposed to put it on your rifle anon.

>>33572003
Swarovski Z6i 1-6.
Probably the best in illumination, glass and weight in its price category.