This is what Carl Carried before he carried the CCP (Carl Carry

>>33550235
What the fuck are you talking about

Because they can still easily kill a person and it'll likely never have to do so anyway

File: Smith-and-Wesson-437-10274-GAG_AS-10274.jpg.jpg (21KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 500x500px

>>33550235

Model 437

>>33550235
the only thing wrong here is the mismatched colors

>>33550235
Men don't

>>33550235
>carl carry pistolet
lost hard

anyway, europoor nogunz here, is his choice unreasonable? I guess he and gun jesus should know a thing or two about guns by now, so...

>>33551234
no, its just an opportunity to shitpost

File: CjsL1zpVEAA6OWM.jpg (12KB, 470x313px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 470x313px

>>33551101
>frame lock

File: tmp_2577-SW_Performance_Center_Model_327_170245_357-Magnum_7R.JPG631967925.jpg (2MB, 2696x2106px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2696x2106px

>>33551101

Are you sure it isn't a Smith & Wesson 327?

File: 1489774210244.jpg (452KB, 2376x1584px) Image search: [Google]

452KB, 2376x1584px

>>33550235
he is a fat guy who runs like Bernie Sanders. Need I say more?

>>33550235

People carry wheel guns for any of the following reasons.

They're more reliable, one could try to argue against this all they want, but they are, and for many reasons.

They fit the hand better and some shooters find it easier to shoot. They have a natural point of aim.

Fun to use at the range, and it's important to train with the gun you're carrying. More than likely they'll use it at the range and carry it as well.

One will most likely never even need to use their gun. Let alone pull it out. 5 or 6 shots and a speed loader in the other pocket is more than enough for most people.

Very easy to carry. Nothing to fumble with. Once you load it. It's just point and shoot.

>>33551295
>arraying your boolits in a satanic symbol configuration

>>33551354
none of what you wrot is true and Glocks are point and shoot too, just without a 12lbs trigger and a wole array of copycat pistols exist. only legit purpose for revolvers is magnum revolvers in dangerous game country.

>>33550235
revolver master dont need more than 6 bullet to kill 6 man
and if you engage more than six man, you die even if you have 20 bullet.

>>33550235
Contact shots mane. Can't do that with a short recoil operated pistol.

In all seriousness though, 6-8 shots in a wheelgun is about the same as having 6-8 shots in an autoloader. You'll likely never fire the thing to actually stop an attacker, and if you do, you'll most likely only fire it once or twice. Can you swap mags faster than you can use a speed strip or a speed loader? Most definitely. Will you likely ever have to do a speed reload with your carry gun to protect yourself from a group of highly motivated attackers? Probably not.

>>33551441

Wrong. My sister wanted a handgun for home defense and has pretty bad carpal tunnel syndrome so she has a hard time working a slide even on a .380; revolver was the perfect answer.

>>33551522
Karl's Model 327 is an 8-shooter though.

well thats what i get for not sticking with ULM walthers. thanks for the heads up

File: hqdefault.jpg (15KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 480x360px

>>33551587
stay safe and pray to god you don't drop that shit

>>33551554
Beretta 86. Tip up barrel lets you load a cartridge into the chamber with no need to rack the slide, blowback .380 ACP is nice and light on recoil.

Not saying a wheelgun is a bad choice, just that there are automatics out there which would work well too.

>>33551606
actually tempted to get some blanks and test it.

>>33551112
the cylinder and barrel are titanium and the frame is Scandium

>>33551656
>Scandium

translating: pot metal

>>33550235
Carl is a dumbass and so is anyone that believes all of the shit he spews.

>>33551671
Scandium Aluminium alloy, nothing like cast zinc. Scandium Al alloys are remarkably strong, stronger than any polymer frame

>>33551671
>pot metal

Nah, it's actually mostly aluminum. Scandium is am additive used in aluminum alloys tk add strength. Scandium framed Smiths, especially on something like an eight shot L-frame like the one pictured in the OP, should be able to take plenty of use with magnums and specials before needing a rebuild. Unless you're a really crazy high volume shooter, you'll likely never notice any difference other than more felt recoil due to the gun being lighter.

File: 026049f53d-1486634957481.jpg (46KB, 700x518px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 700x518px

>>33551671
>Scandium-Aluminium alloy
>Potmetal
How does it feel to be retarded?

>>33550235
It puts big enough holes in people to the carrier's preference and doesn't break that much

>>33551441

Wrong. None of what you wrote is true.

>revolvers aren't ammo picky, any type of hollowpoints, soft lead, wadcutters, as long as it fits, it will shoot reliably. No having to worry about brands or nose shape.

>round didn't go off when you're in a life and death struggle with a nigger? That's okay, pull the trigger again instantly. Let's see you do that with a semi auto.

>close contact distances where someone is struggling for gun control or your gun is pressing up against them? No worries there's no slide to be put out of battery

>grip is made to fit the human hand, as opposed to the magazine shape compromise of semi autos where you can only work around so much. Revolvers feel much better, more natural to point and shoot

>are the magazine feeding lips or springs in order? No need to worry about that.

>357 magnum is one of the best man stoppers around, not out of a snub but out of a 4 inch barrel it most definitely is. That's a two legged criter round.

I could go on actually but I'm not gonna bother seeing as you probably left the thread.

>>33551742
how big is big enough

>>33552139
>round didn't go off when you're in a life and death struggle with a nigger? That's okay, pull the trigger again instantly. Let's see you do that with a semi auto.

>pull trigger
>no bang
>pull trigger again
>that hang fire you just rotated away from the barrel decides to detonate
>gun explodes, hand destroyed, jamal beats you to death with the remains of your revolver

>>33552383
>not using a pepperbox in the year of our lord 0+2017

>>33550235
what video is this?

>>33552383
FTE and FTF in autos are way more common than hangfires in all guns. In fact, if you're using a good quality defensive round they're almost non-existent.

>>33552383
I pointed this out in another thread and the resident revolver fag said "that doesn't matter in a life or death situation."

Your gun exploding doesn't matter in a life or death situation. The gun you are counting on to protect your life and possibly the lives of others fucking EXPLODING doesn't fucking matter. Revolver fags probably have a couple extra chromosomes, and I fucking like revolvers. They have a nice aesthetic and they're easy to train newbies with, especially the ones that panic at having more than three controls on a gun.

But goddamn, hardcore revolver fags are masters of self-delusion.

>>33552383
>hang fire

Do you load your defense ammunition with black powder?

>>33550235
Only thing that surprises me is he wouldn't get a bobbed or internal hammer for pocket firing. If you are going snubby, I feel like that is the best way to roll.

File: Hunter BEST with Gun 3.jpg (55KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 640x480px

I mostly carry a j-frame 442 w/o a lock.

>>33551264
https://www.smith-wesson.com/firearms/model-442-revolver-no-internal-lock

>>33552459
Here's the thing: the 'pull the trigger again if the round doesn't go off' thing is stupid because revolvers ARE more reliable.

Think about it. If a revolver, guns that are famous for being able to fire absolute garbage ammo, can't fire it, there's something horribly wrong with that cartridge.

>>33552472
>thinks you'll get a hangfire with modern defensive ammunition
You're the delusional one here, friendo

At any rate, that same hangfire you just fucked on about just detonated halfway out of the chamber and your Glock fulfilled it's destiny.

>>33550235

You can stick it in a dude and set it off without it going out of battery.

>>33552546
lewd

>>33551606
t.some black dude

YELLO CAKE

File: DSC00278.jpg (204KB, 1200x801px) Image search: [Google]

204KB, 1200x801px

>>33552408
I would unironically carry a pepperbox if they made one 357 that had five shots, or a 44 special with four.

>>33550235
I think half of /k/ hates Karl because he's opinionated, just like /k/ is. The conflict was bound to happen.

>>33552139
>revolvers aren't ammo picky...

not an argument. in SHTF PKMNclypse sure, go for a revolver wwhen you ahve to shoot ammo amde from match heads. otherwise, stick with quality ammo or your own quality reloads and you'll be fine.

>round didn't go off... pull the trigger again instantly. Let's see you do that with a semi auto.

There are plenty SA/DA pistols out there which can do that. Are you retarded?

>No worries there's no slide to be put out of battery

this is a tell-tale sign you've never been in a physical confroontation of any kind.

>grip is made to fit the human hand, as opposed to the magazine shape compromise of semi autos where you can only work around so much. Revolvers feel much better, more natural to point and shoot

Garbage. I have over 9000 fgts who told me my Luger has the best grip and ergos of any gun ever but the same ppl shit on the Glock. Ergos and everything related is a simple matter of training and taste only.

>are the magazine feeding lips or springs in order? No need to worry about that.

No need to worry about that in a Glock either.

>357 magnum is one of the best man stoppers around

calibur wars!

>I could go on actually but I'm not gonna bother seeing as you probably left the thread.

I did.

>>33552669
is this true? I never got /k/'s view on the two, its the only gun related content that's not MURICA FUCK YEA cringe level like basically all others

>>33552669
>hates Karl

I didn't give a shit about him until he made that net spying video. now I wouldn't piss on him if he was on fire. also, him and Ian made a Q&A vid last week where they shit on "people who carry openly, in a low riding tactical nylon holster and maybe also wear a racist t-shirt" claiming those ppl give gun oners a bad rep thus giving gun grabbing libs ammo to come after us. which is total garbage. nobody here in the EU carries openly, in a low riding tactical nylon holster and while wearing a racist t-shirt and the media and establishment still manages to paint gun owners as barely literate psychopaths. Ian and Coral, if you are reading here, this sort of cowardly appeasement is the reason why your 2ndA is in such a desolate condition and if you continue like this, you future looks like that of the UK and Australia gun rights wise.

>>33552139
>going out of timing
>something blocking your hammer
>something preventing the cylinder from rotating
>having to worry about hammer spring wear
>having to worry about cylinder bursts
Everyone can nitpick

>>33552538
Why did the hang fire detonate halfway out of the chamber? Remember the situation is that you are in a tussle and can only operate the gun one handed.

>>33552500
Pocket firing a fucking N frame

Shut the fuck up

>>33552815
I personally like both of them, and don't particularly care one way or the other what /k/ in aggregate thinks of them. I'm just here to shiptost.

>>33552840
>nobody here in the EU carries openly, in a low riding tactical nylon holster and while wearing a racist t-shirt and the media and establishment still manages to paint gun owners as barely literate psychopaths.

Just because authoritarian leftists attack you doesn't mean we should conduct ourselves in a way that makes it even easier for them to make those attacks.

>>33551279
Just fuck my muzzle velocity vision, and hearing up

>>33552840
Except they're right about open carry

It's for faggot who want to show off that they have a gun - just as cringey as concealed carry badges.

>tactical disadvantage
>paints gunowners in a poor light
>makes you look like a mouth breathing retard
>more easily snatched by Jamal

OC is for when your in the country plinking, hunting, etc. also in case of emergencies on the scale of the LA riots. Not for people too fat or lazy to get an iwb holster

>>33552945
>this

Barrel length is one of the easier things to conceal, unlike the fuck huge cylinder of an n frame

File: 1433403200185.jpg (168KB, 380x380px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 380x380px

>mfw there are people who carry snubbies
>mfw there are people who carry EAA or Taurus snubbies

Saturday night specials are the worst, get a good semi-auto if you're going to carry

>>33552929
>>33552964
well, just two more guys I wouldn't piss on if I saw them on fire.

Revolvers are only better at being starter pistols. I already see multiple people in this thread talking about hangfires and other ammo malfunctions. That won't happen with high quality self defense ammo. Same for semi-auto pistols. You won't have a malfunction unless you keep it in shit condition or have some shitty $100 pistol. In the astronomically low chance you ever have a malfunction in your semi-auto, if you have any training or practice you can fix it in less than a second.

The future is now, revolverfags. You are outdated. Even in the 90's people only carried revolvers for large game while hiking. Now we have reliable 10mm semi-autos that put revolver loads to shame. Honestly. Look at the people that carry revolvers. They are Fudds or living in the past. I bet your idol is Yankeemarshal.

>>33552992
>reliable 10mm semi-autos
modern 10mm is weak stuff

Nice gunlet

File: 1479315526217.jpg (27KB, 315x325px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 315x325px

>b-but with a revolver you can just pull the trigger again if there's a misfire!

This is a fair point, but jams and most problems that would occur are more easily solvable with an automatic. An automatic is also easier to disassemble out in the field.

If something goes wrong with a revolver, you're fucked.

>>33552985
>Hahaha funny insult from movie

I'd like to hear you actually try to defend these fags who oc

File: 142341645696.jpg (142KB, 1117x745px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1117x745px

>>33553003
>b-but with a revolver you can just pull the trigger again if there's a misfire!

how is it possible ppl don't know there a sa-da polymer pistols out there and not every pistol needs the slide to cycle to cock the striker spring like the Glock? what is this place? I was told this is where gun enthusiasts meet?

>>33553000
It's really not. It's just expensive to get the good stuff. If you are skimping on self defense ammo you deserve the malfunctions that will come with it.

>>33553006
it's not any insult, it's a statement of fact about myself and has nothing to do with you. OCing is your right, end of fucking story.

>>33552840
>here in the EU

Opinion discarded. When will the Euros learn that they can't compare themselves to us?

>>33552851
Most of those are prevented by having a revolver that isn't old and worn out.

>>33553041

gee, you sound just like an european librul...

>>33552754
>There are plenty SA/DA pistols out there which can do that. Are you retarded?

t. No guns

>>33553070
>>33553019
Are you?

>>33553032
Calling people niggers in public is also a right I have, but I'm smart enough to realize there are more disadvantages than advantages to exercising that particular part of my right.

>>33553066
How?

>>33550235
>Tfw every time you try to discuss the revolver you want to CC, you get a bunch of Anons goin
>LOL MEME GUN
>*tipe fedora*
>NICE ANIMOO GUN MEMESTER
:(
I like it!

>>33552840
>here in the EU
>trip
>talks about US constitution rights
Filtered.

File: get memed on kid.jpg (49KB, 665x382px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 665x382px

>>33551101

>>33553119
He's not a trip. He's a namefag. You would know the difference if you weren't a newfag.

File: 1467212429844.jpg (82KB, 818x960px) Image search: [Google]

82KB, 818x960px

>>33553118

>>33553118
Post it, then, faggot. What is it?

>>33553118
That's why /k/ isn't really a good place to talk about guns, most of the time. Have you not noticed the antagonistic overtones for almost every thread?

>>33553112
by shitting and pissing down from your ivory tower on people who you deem to be inferior to you. the contemporary classism in the EU can easily challange India's caste system.

>>33553070
>every hammer fired Sig
>every hammer fired HK
>most Ruger semi's
>all CZ's that aren't the P10c
>every S&W semi that predates the M&P
>FNX, FNP

>>33552985
Oh no he doesn't agree with me and has nothing to say about what makes me wrong.

>>33553032
I never said it's not a right, and neither did Ian and Karl. Just because you have a right to carry doesn't mean you should make an ass of yourself while doing so, and that's what they were getting at. We have a hard enough time with how politicians and the media treat us, we shouldn't make it harder on ourselves by confirming what's said about us with our own actions. If you don't understand how damaging it would be to the gun community to have a couple hundred retards stomping around Walmarts across the country with handguns flopping around in $14 drop leg holsters getting into loud arguments and fistfights with people, then you're a fucking moron. In case you aren't aware, we actually do have people like that here in the states, and one run in with a jackass like that does more harm to us than meeting ten reasonable people who also carry can fix.

Anyone as stupid as you has much more of a chance of setting themselves on fire and needing someone else to intervene than I.

>>33553135
Did I hit a nerve you fucking attention whore.
Now put your name on again and cry harder.

>>33553166
I never pissed on anybody. All I ever said was you can't compare Euros to Americans, then you sperged out.

File: IMG_5518.jpg (2MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x4032px

>>33553141
A Rhino 50DS.
>Light
>5in barrel for better .357 ballistics, without the wacky 6in length and extra rail
>Fun to shoot
>I'm actually accurate with it, and staying on target while rapid firing is easy with that low bore axis
>Spess gun looks
Yes, I get it. It looks straight outta muh animes, and it has SEAM, but I really like it.

>>33552599
What is that gun, friendo?

>>33553118
>:(
You don't belong here

Lel. I just got my first pistol today. It's a revolver. I've always liked the style but honestly I bought it on impulse. It's a Tauras Model 85. It's an older one. Did I make a mistake?

>>33553235
>Did I make a mistake?
yes. by getting a taurus.

Have a wheel gun because I had a semiauto already. Some of us actually like guns. Collecting/shooting. It's a very small rare group of autism that settles on one type of gun, let alone a handgun as that one gun especially for defensive purposes.
A lot of old martial arts literature, which I'm sure you haven't read. Most of it recommends training with any and every type of weapon in addition to what you specialize in.
If you don't like wheel guns you're one step past noguns.

>>33551606
ALUMINUM TUBES

>>33553188
>implying I'm him and not just someone calling out another underage retard
reported and hidden

>>33553244
Explain. I've found enough reviews to form an acceptable opinion on them.

>>33553136
>implying it's not the opposite
All I see at my range are Fudds with their burr killers that can't shoot 10 inch groups at 10 yards.

>>33551606
>>33552557
I got it in this special CIA napkin here.

>>33552383

I've had hang fires before with 50yo .30-30 ammunition. They still go off within a third of a second, you'd have to be shooting really fast for it to matter. Honestly, you can make the same argument for any manual action - pump or lever especially.

>hang fire
>trying to be a cowboy oper8or and round detonates with an open breech
>my face
>don't loooook at meeeeee

>>33553058
>mag lips and springs
>not easier to fix than every mechanical issue I mentioned.
Also you left out that someone grabbing your revolver why you try to shoot will prevent it from firing.

>>33553303
>All I see at my range are Fudds with their burr killers that can't shoot 10 inch groups at 10 yards.


its pretty hard to do that with a 44mag when you close your eyes and flinch like a bitch in expectation of the gun's reaction. that's why everybody should start with a 22lr to habituate themselves and them go up slowly from there.

>>33553176
How did you eject the FTF?

>>33553303
That's because Fudds don't take shooting seriously. They tend to shoot a couple times a year at the very most, whereas wannabe "operators" are more likely to want to practice so they can live up to their fantasies of being an elite special forces guy...or they just want to be really good at protecting themselves or their home.

>>33553331
>implying fudds don't go straight for their fuddyfives

>>33553216
Standard Manufacturing VolleyFire.

>>33553324
If you noticed, I didn't address your points one by one. I only said most. In reality, there's advantages and disadvantages to both, and entrenching yourself within one camp or the other doesn't do you any favors.

>>33553353
>b-b-bbut that's just because people who shoot revolvers don't shoot much. We only pretend to know what we're talking about. Aha, you thought we were serious?

>>33553411
Where in my post did I defend fudds?

>>33553429
When you called people that shoot semi-autos all "wannabe operators." That's the definition of fuddtalk

>>33551606
JAPAN'S SENDING PLAYSTATIONS

>>33553464
I also said they might also want to be really good at defending themselves or their home.

Did you really get that pissy before finishing my entire post? It wasn't even a long post.

>>33552472
tell me when in your life have you seen a revolver explode???

> too lethal
what?

>>33553479
The triple dot Fudd sarcasm. Don't play it off like that's not what you were going for, fag. >>33553353

>>33553496
Since you already have your mind made up, here's your (you)

>>33550235
btw it's Karl not Carl ~Karl

>>33553235
I bought one two weeks ago, nice guy really shitty optics which translates to more shooting practice

>>33550235
It's probably convenient to carry and he's a good shot with it.

Just a guess.

>>33552754

>not an argument

are you sure? most people I know of can't afford 200 rounds of buffalobore just to make sure it can feed properly in their individual gun

>there are plenty SA/DA pistols out there which can do that. Are you retarded?

Apparently you are. Because I don't know of a single worthy carry pistol which will cycle a new round if it didn't fire the one in the chamber with a simple trigger pull. That's just basic gun knowledge.

>This is a tell-tale sign you've never been in a physical confrontation of any kind.

The irony is too much to bear, this actually is a sign YOU'VE never been in one. My secondary MOS was a MCMAP instructor, not to mention I partake in MMA, BJJ, Judo, and boxing on the side. Hey, but don't take my word for it idiot, there's plenty of videos from guys like Shivworks who work with simunition, CONSTANTLY showing how semi-autos VERY COMMONLY get pushed out of battery and have FTF failures and must manually be fixed while in a struggle (which proves to be very hard to do while in a life and death struggle, unlike in your imagination)

>Garbage. I have over 9000 fgts who told me my Luger has the best grip and ergos of any gun ever.

Let's just say your Luger has the best ergos of any gun ever, who the fuck carries a Luger? You're subjective evidence is the only garbage here. It's a FACT, that revolvers have way more potential for ergonomics than semi autos because there's no magazine to account for when shaping the grip.

>No need to worry about that in a Glock either

Ohhh... does Glock Magazine have indestructible feeding lips and springs that last forever?

>calibur wars

This makes the irony even more unbearable, coming from the faggot who said "not an argument" then proceeds to bring up the shittiest non-factual arguments into the conversation.

>I did

Nah, you couldn't resist, and whether you respond or not, I know you're awaiting my response because you were hoping I wouldn't notice all the holes in your argument

>>33552984

Can you find me a pocket semi auto that is comfortable to carry, reliable, and shoots something stronger than .380?

Only time I carry my SP 101 is around the house because it's comfy and light. I forget it's there, and it will work if Jamal comes busting through the door.
Everywhere else, it's the G29 or G19. I can hit with those like Annie Oakley, the SP is harder for me to shoot with precision.

>>33552992

Glocks can't even handle .40S&W properly, and you're telling me that we have reliable 10mm glocks lol

The best .357 round is still stronger than the best 10mm,

.44mag surpasses 10mm by so much they're not even comparable.

And plenty of cops have died in physical confrontations where their guns have a FTF due to the nature of struggling with an assailant for gun control. Which is why they carry a pocket snubbie instead of a pocket semi as back up.

>>33553003

Even if you dismantle your semi auto, can you fix it in the field? No? Well then what's the point? If you brought the necessary tools to fix the problem, same could be said of a revolver.

Also, malfunctions are very rare in the revolvers. Not to mention, zero chance of limp wrist, which one cannot account for 100% in a dynamic self defense situation

>>33553019

How is it possible that people somehow think this cycles a new working round into the chamber. It's still not a revolver, and if the bullet continues to not fire either due to

A:not being seated properly

or

B: Being a dud

Then your SA/DA is still useless.

>>33553275

Taurus has a reputation for making shitty guns. They're made in a third world shithole in brazil, and they have a monopoly on the gun industry there. Which means they can afford to have shit quality because they have very little to no competitors.

That being said, their revolvers seem to be okay. It's their semi-autos which are the problem.

>>33552985
>stop reminding me that I'm a fucking dipshit.

>>33553166
Unironically kill yourself.

>>33552985
>man my one liner is so clever, I better keep parroting it

Seriously kys

>>33554112
You're the cancer of K, I bet you've never even fired a 10mm. hurrdurr some more, drag us deeper into the shit.
If you weren't an aspie you'd make some friends that can afford to shoot 10mm. Until then, stfu

File: 1472676713552.png (165KB, 639x462px) Image search: [Google]

165KB, 639x462px

>>33550235
I sometimes carry one. if it works for me for that particular day then it'll serve

File: CZ shine.jpg (2MB, 4149x1941px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 4149x1941px

>>33550235
if you compare a wheelgat to certain autos its obviously going to come up short. A .38 snubnose vs a glock 19? yeah the glock is better in at least half a dozen different ways. Capacity, reload speed, size, weight, ect

But compare to another pocket auto, like a glock 43 or sig p238, its a bit more fair. They have similar if not the same capacity, closer in weight, and size so its not that great of a loss if you use one

Now, ballistics are a crapshoot anyway, but if you get into mangum territory thats a whole different game. usually people carry those as trail guns anyway. Basically a revovler just as much of a niche ccw as anything else, if it fits that niche for the day then who cares
>going through a bad area with known crime
>carry a glock 17
>going out to the store to grab some milk, and theres hardly anything bad happening there if at all
>fuck it, toss a .38 in my pocket and go

>>33550235
I usually carry a semi-auto, but as long as the carry gun holds at least 6 rounds, and goes bang when you pull the noise-button, I don't really care either way.

>>33551295
>the French were courteous enough to label their gun "trausch" so Americans wouldn't bother
how nice of them

>>33550235
He can do what he wants.

I'd rather have to face anyone in this thread with the full-size of their choice than go head-to-head with Karl.

File: ff.png (701KB, 1231x687px) Image search: [Google]

701KB, 1231x687px

>>33552840
You are so right. Most of neo/k/ will attack you for not acting like you're stepping on glass to not offend the leftist anti gunners.

Ian and Karl are the typical elitist arrogant gun owners, pretty much the equivelent of a psuedo intellectual redditor but in the firearms world. Sometimes I watch forgotten weapons still but I have zero illusions about these kind of people.

Its unfortunate /k/ and so many other gun owners are pathetic little weaklings and will bend over to the will of others at the expense of their rights. I can tell you for sure I'll never donate a cent to the money grubbing patreons of people like this who casually insult gun owners exercising their rights.

File: 1435684765001.jpg (40KB, 403x401px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 403x401px

>>33555313
>Ian and Karl are the typical elitist arrogant gun owners, pretty much the equivelent of a psuedo intellectual redditor but in the firearms world.

nicely put. also I reject the notion that some guy reflects badly on me just becaus we both have/like guns. pic related. I'm not responsible for other ppl's actions. that's called kin liability/guilt by association and is usually condemned by libturds.

>>33555313
>>33555313

Some of his earlier tech rants were of questionable value, but I couldn't find anything particularly wrong with the one he did about "spying", as you call it (I assume you mean the FCC rule nullification video).

>>33555378
>9gag image

Damn I feel bad for agreeing with you but I do.

>>33555387
I'm not talking about that I haven't watched his newest one I watched one he did on digital rights but I don't have a problem with what was said there.

>>33553204

Yankee Marshal, plz go.

>>33553019
Listen up you fucking idiot, if you have a bad primer you can hit it as many times as your gay little heart wants too it still wont go off because its a BAD FUCKING PRIMER HOLY FUCK IM ACTUALLY MAD AT YOUR STUPIDITY

File: 1491522249634.gif (2MB, 216x150px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 216x150px

>>33556708
I hope he's a troll, I carry a semi auto but even I agknowlege the drawbacks and understand why people would like revolvers. Just fucking get out and train so you are proficent with the guns you use instead of getting into online dick waving feuds and if you want to have reasonable discussion about tradeoffs .

>>33554077

A Glock 43... assuming you're not a woman it should fit in your jean front pocket no problem, with a decent pocket holster the most anyone would be able to tell is maybe you have a larger phone or small tablet if they looked really close.

Then again if someone is staring at your crouch for that long you're probably in for a good time.

>>33555378
It might even be usually condemned, but its how the human mind works, by association. We constantly associate things to evaluate the impact it can have on our lives, the muslim problem being a fantastic example.

>Be me shlomo shekelstein strolling around in Gaza
>I know x percent of muslims are fanatics ready to cause death
>I see a muslim on the street
>My mind asks if he might be the one in x percent that's gonna knife my guts out

Its simple instinct, self preservation.
Now the two guys of the show asked for responsible gun ownership, so noguns in the streets would see them in a different, better light, removing more social stigma so even more people and maybe themselves (the noguns) would start to carry/take part in matches/become part of the gun community. Is it hard to understand?

>>33554465

Not an argument faggot. But you knew that from the start.

10mm hottest round still weaker than 357s hottest.

44 mag blows 10mm out the ball park

>>33551295
>That bluing
muh dick

>>33552599
Five does not stack well. I feel like you only said what you did because you don't like the COP.

Thanks to this thread, I'm now carrying a revolver.

>>33551295
so you mean pretty well until some bitches from NY decide to rig the election.

>looking at you Mr President, and you Madame Secretary.

>>33552383
In all the thousands of rounds I've shot, I've never seen a hang fire. FTFs, FTEs? Sure. But never a hangfire.

File: sorow.png (239KB, 400x412px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 400x412px

>>33560895
>Donald Trump having to do anything with Democrat primaries
Did I miss something?

>>33551354

>They're more reliable
Either a no guns faggot, or a stupid fudd faggot.

>>33554066
rekt

>>33550235
how else do you carry a loaded gun with no safety, a round in the chamber in your pocket with no holster?

serious question. revolver is hammerless, nothing else in pocket

File: xZmvNMD.png (278KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

278KB, 960x960px

>>33551354
I know karl said in the video that particular revolver he is holding holds 8 shots

and ur missing a reason for carrying a revolver, they dont leave brass behind so you can shoot a nig on the street and not have to go through the legal troubles

>>33551354
>They're more reliable
Untill they stop being reliable. You can use remedial action on a semi-automatic pistol. Remedial action on a revolver usually involves a trip to the gun smith.

>>33551354
>They fit the hand better and some shooters find it easier to shoot. They have a natural point of aim.
Subjective, subjective and subjective.

>One will most likely never even need to use their gun.
You don't carry for the days you don't need your gun: you carry for the days you need it. Reloads are slower.

Revolvers are objectively worse for carrying.

>>33551554
A handgun for home defence if you have carpal tunnel is a bad idea. Tell her to get a PCC.

>>33553324
on a hammerless revolver I try as hard as i can to prevent the cylinder from turning, whilst squeezing the trigger as hard as I can with the other hand, personally I find it impossible to keep the gun from functioning by grabbing it

File: skeleton priests axe.jpg (50KB, 557x781px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 557x781px

>>33562396
>>33562422
these are real concerns of mine if anyone has any wisdom

>>33562416
>Needing more than 6 shots for when you need your gun

Are you living in a city where you have to fend off Jamal and his pack of 20 niggers when shit goes down? Because most of the time 1-2 shots will be enough to frighten off a solo attacker.

>>33553722
Thanks brah. Whenever I get off for work I'm going to shoot it.

>>33555387
>>33555400
I actually bought an HTC Vive after Karl showed the virtual reality shooter called Onward. I thought it was a gimmick until I saw his video on it and had no idea a game like that was made for VR. It's has some different content other than your standard 2 minute intro of some dude shooting a gun before he gets to the content.

>>33555313
>Ian and Karl are the typical elitist arrogant gun owners, pretty much the equivelent of a psuedo intellectual redditor but in the firearms world.
Having met them in person as well as watching their videos, I think this is true but mostly still not a bad thing. Most average gun owners are retards and only very rarely does Ian/Karl's attitude seem to lead to anything I would find disagreeable.

>>33553314
I've had hang fires with 50 year old 7.62x54R. One of them went off at least two seconds after I pulled the trigger.

>>33566545
>Nothing wrong with being a psuedo intellectual redditor

wew

>>33550235
>This is what Carl
Carl? Who the fuck is Carl? Why the fuck do you worship these pseudo-celebs? Who gives a fuck who Carl is and what Carl carries.

Go get a fucking job so you won't have to waste your life away following these idiots online.

PS: Seriously dude, get a job.

>>33562268

Let's be honest. You're just being a contrarian to known knowledge, so you can APPEAR to be more knowledgeable. But some knowledge is just timeless, sport.

Revolvers can obviously fail as all man made objects can. But you have to be a special kind of stupid to think semi autos are just as reliable as a revolver.

15 years of shooting not a single revolver malfunction. I have seen one from another shooter at the range. Just one. And it was an old worn out revolver.

15 years of shooting. I've had to clear FTFs on all my semi autos. And there's not a day at the range I don't see AT LEAST ONE guy pull the trigger with a flinch and then stare at his gun when nothing happened, and then proceed to figure out what the fuck happened. Which many times consists of pulling back on the slide, staring at the gun, letting the slide fall forward again, and then it having not go off a second time.

I'm not hating on semi autos. If I'm going to a very dangerous neighborhood id take my glock 19 and 2 spare mags.

But I feel plenty safe with my. 38 special in my pocket for most carry situations

>>33562416

Your first point is already all skewed and illogical.

Remedial action on a revolver is to pull the trigger again. If a revolver fails. It would be an incredibly rare failure. The same one which could also happen to a semi auto which would also put it out of commission.

To simplify to you idiots.

Revolvers have a very low chance of having malfunctions, lower so than semi autos since they don't require having perfect feeding ramps or ammo that works with it, a dud round wont keep it from firing the next rounds, nor worry about limp wristing or the most common of all FTF in semi autos, faulty magazines.

But of course when a revolver fails it fails for good... But uhhhh... same can be said of a semi auto idiot. Both are prone and open to big failures if they have a necessary part break.

>>33566567
>nothing wrong
>but mostly still not a bad thing

As opposed to all of the other /k/ youtubers? Only one that's actually good is garandthumb and that's more out of luck that he browses /k/ than /k/ producing anything of value. How many other channels out there try to build some kind of repertoire outside of vacuous gun reviews where the only real intensive input is about the "fit and finish" of a gun?

>>33553303
Good shooters don't go shooting at public ranges.

>>33553350
Pull the trigger again, and if it doesn't go boom wait the standard safety timeout to make sure you hand doesn't go boom, after which you rack the slide?

>>33566995
This, so much this.

>>33562447
You could grab a cylinder to stop a revolver from firing. The trigger isn't strong enough so most likely it'd just break before firing.
However, it shouldn't really be a concern to you. It's incredibly hard to grab it and keep a good grip while fighting with somebody.

>>33550235
Because revolvers are aesthetic. Although, if I was going to carry one I'd just go full meme and carry a 5 or 6 inch one.

File: pike.jpg (1MB, 4000x1598px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 4000x1598px

>>33567749

That's not full meme anon.