What's the pros and cons of using land based military

File: F36GE8RG1QVZ4VK.RECT2100.jpg (945KB, 2100x1712px) Image search: [Google]

945KB, 2100x1712px

>>33442334
>Pros
Cheaper than a catapult.
>Cons
Americans make fun of you on /k/.

>>33442334
>pros
standardized with other logistics
>cons
retrofitting of ship and equipment

>>33442334

On the rare occasion using the same weapon system, nothing.

>>33442334
Land based tech isn't going to last long. They aren't designed to deal with the salty conditions.

>Pros
You already have it
It's cheaper than some custom solution
It's quick to implement
>Cons
Now it's hogging your helipad
It'll probably slide off into the sea when some drunk sailor manages to undo the tiedowns

Its a test you retards.

File: 1340284580818.jpg (53KB, 670x447px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 670x447px

Absolutely nothing.

>>33442667

Cool af

>>33442334

What I find amusing is that the USA has essentially done the opposite to the Russians.

http://www.lockheedmartin.co.uk/us/products/aegis/aegis-ashore.html

>>33442334
One of the cons is that you typically put a lot of effort on making it saltwater resistant

File: 1487045444702.webm (3MB, 854x480px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 854x480px

>>33443955

THIS..Unless it was for riverine purpose. Using equipment without making it saltwater-corrosion resistant surely will spell an increasing cost just to maintain them.

>>33442334
Pros: unification goes in every field.
Cons: you have to adjust it for naval conditions.
It's not like it's something new.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tor_missile_system#3K95_Kinzhal_.28Naval_Variant.29
>>33442707
Since when AEGIS ashore is a highly mobile self-sustaining platform?

File: 1208.1 slepen mak-11 vyuga.jpg (208KB, 1400x1050px) Image search: [Google]

208KB, 1400x1050px

>>33442667

>>33443955
Just don't go to salty seas then??

File: EiIkqUA.jpg (121KB, 1240x991px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1240x991px

German experiment of putting PzH2000 155mm SPG turret on frigate. The experiment fails.

>>33444068

Congratulations on not being able to read.

File: 6S66uX8.jpg (97KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 1024x683px

>>33444075

Here's another one from Romania.

>>33443955
This, salt water fucks shit up quick

File: bAhBnoZ.jpg (826KB, 3456x2304px) Image search: [Google]

826KB, 3456x2304px

North Korean Navy example. During the 2002 Battle of Yellow Sea. One of this antiquated ship using a 85mm shell managed to score a critical direct hit on more modern South Korea patrol ship.

File: 1204 shmel.jpg (594KB, 1632x920px) Image search: [Google]

594KB, 1632x920px

>>33444091
Neat.

File: 1208 slepen khabarovsk.jpg (76KB, 1117x718px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 1117x718px

>>33444083
>The experiment fails.
Why? Germans cannot into river monitors?

I feel like it is easier to put a naval system on land than vice versa

File: Pzh 2000-monarc_52_gr.jpg (1MB, 1811x2907px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1811x2907px

>>33444749

Corrosion from sea water and heavier than expected recoil disrupting the ship electronics. Plus the turret and mounting system cannot stand against rough sea condition.

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MONARC

File: 1208.1 slepen mak-11 vyuga (2).jpg (544KB, 1000x750px) Image search: [Google]

544KB, 1000x750px

>>33444075
Btw this particular one called MAK-11 Vyuga has had laser armament since mid 80s.