Is the Sig Sauer P320 the handgun America deserves? https:/

Will it come in black?

>>33366515
But not the one it needs right now

File: IMG_2219.jpg (2MB, 3021x2747px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3021x2747px

>>33367466
>>33366515
Proprietary rear side plate means no non-SIG aftermarket sights and disassembling the striker mechanism in the slide requires special tools so grunts don't fuck with it. Get a regular P320

>>33366515
>rear sight dove tailed (?) in longitudinally to the bore

I knew sig was trash but I didn't expect it to be this bad.

The trials in a nutshell:

Glock:
>"Everyone uses us anyways, the fuck does it matter. Have a Glock off the shelf."

Beretta:
>"We heard you complain about our pistol being too big and not modular enough. So we put a rail on the bottom and gave it a threaded barrel. Did nothing for the size because this is how we did the last one."

Sig:
>"Whuh? Oh... we made this a couple years ago... here, take it."

Colt:
>Autistic Screeching.

>>33368704
Protip the Glock submission was not an "off the shelf" model

Protip 2 M9A3 grip dimensions are not the same as M9A1

I really dislike how excessively plastic looking the frame is.

It's far too smooth.

>>33368704
>Colt:
>>Autistic Screeching.

Colt is like a 20-year-old dog that's become an invalid and shits on itself because it's too old to stand up to go to the bathroom and had to have constant 24/7 care. They just need to be taken out back and shot to be out of its misery.

>>33372473
It looks like that in that picture but it feels good in the hand.

>>33366515
I like it

>>33366515
>>33367466
>>33368056
What's the difference? Didn't even know there was a "regular" p320 vs. the one the army chose

>>33369463
What was the Glock model like?

>>33368077

it's a removable plate so you can fit a MRDS eventually.

>>33373000
one of those responses literally said all the differences

>>33373035
a glock 19 with an external safety

>>33366515
>Carry slide
>Subcompact frame
>Threaded barrel with brake

Welcome to the suck muhreen.

>>33366515

G19 with fuckhuge topheaviness and akward as fuck grip.

Pass. I'd rather take the M9A1 thanks.

File: 4ae63b387b021f294c71a6df072eb9dc.jpg (58KB, 540x540px) Image search: [Google]

58KB, 540x540px

>>33366515

>>33372473
The grip texture is actually well done.

>>33374956
No. They sent a g17 and a g20, and no compact model.their first submission had no external safety.

>>33368704
>"We heard you complain about our pistol being too big and not modular enough. So we put a rail on the bottom and gave it a threaded barrel. Did nothing for the size because this is how we did the last one."

M9A3 has several improvements, including a thinner grip.

Also Beretta submitted the APX for the trials, not the M9A3. The A3 was offered instead of the MHS.

>>33372473
I bet you are really old. Plastic is the material of the future. It's lighter and just as strong. Since a service pistol spends 99.9% of its time riding your leg, lighter is better.

>>33368056
Are you telling me that grunts won't be able to field strip their fucking pistols?

Will M9s/92s become cheaper once the military switches?

>>33377429
Assuming the old guns get sold to civies, of course that would happen. An excess supply would drive prices down.

>>33367466
cuck

File: IMG_4922.jpg (363KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

363KB, 900x600px

>>33373035

File: heat treated blank1.jpg (251KB, 1382x778px) Image search: [Google]

251KB, 1382x778px

>>33366515
Yes it is, because you can make your own registered part with holes drilled in some good sheet metal, bent and welded a little bit.

It's the perfect handgun for America.