I know something 9mmfags and .45fags can agree on. That 5.7x28mm

File: freemasonry-the-matrix-reloaded-the-architect.jpg (62KB, 840x348px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 840x348px

>>33366314
>trying to start a caliber war on /k/

this is the millionth time weve made one of these thread and we have become exceedingly annoyed by it.

>>33366314
9mm fag here.

I don't hate 5.7x28.
I hate 4.6 because it's just a way to make 5.7 a bit worse to get because lolproprietary.

I also actually like .45 but only in revolvers.

>>33366314
SS190 is cool

Every successful military arm basically has a civillian market. Specialized rounds that are so light they practically disintegrate on some targets unless you have hardened rounds they only want leo/mil to have is never going to catch on

>>33366314
I'd take 5.7x28 over 45 AARP any day. Speed, capacity, lower recoil, and better penetration.

Shot placement is king, and the round that lets you put the most shots on targets is the best round.

Sure it'd shit. It's shit because you can't buy it in bulk for 15cpr,there are only two decent guns chambered in it and everyone likes to repeat that AP ammo doesn't exist.

Meanwhile in reality American Eagle is cheap,defensive ammo does fine and it's fun as fuck to shoot. Sure we all wish the FNX 5.7T was a thing but it's not. Enough your garbage fire of a thread now

>>33366502
So why not carry a .22?

>>33368241
5.7x28 exists, rimfire rounds have shit ignition reliability, and rim cartridges cause rimlock.

I love to replace my 9mm with 4.6x30 desu. fuck 5.7 though. FN are fags.

>>33368282
why not .25 ACP?

>>33368282
Why not .32 ACP?

>>33368309
>Why not .32 ACP?
I do carry one, rimlock and limited penetration against barriers in comparison to 5.7/4.6. Also capacity.

File: gun-girlfriend-bear-shot-in-the-knee-964290.jpg (38KB, 428x484px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 428x484px

>>33368294