http://www.bbc.com/news/world-europ e-39314250 >At the a

>>33346031
Why would you have a female soldier?

They are objectively much worse than male soldiers

File: 1369929689107.jpg (293KB, 800x534px) Image search: [Google]

293KB, 800x534px

>>33346042
Not every country is a greasy sausage fest with 18th century standards.

File: 1489820601684.png (48KB, 215x200px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 215x200px

>>33346073
not every country is desperate enough for soldiers, that they have to enlist skirts

File: 1480297389168.jpg (53KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 640x480px

>>33346085
>I'm weaker boipuccy than a girl, so I must vent out about it online to restore my manhood!

>>33346073
When i was 8 i had bigger arms than her.

>>33346085
>Mad because he got rejected for service

Nothing worse than an insecure man like you.

>>33346095
and did you also haul around MG3 or your daddys dick?

HALP!

I remember seeing a video of Michael Sandford (thy guy who went on a fucking stupid trip to assassinate Trump) at the moment he tried to steal a gun from a police officer. I'm trying to find that again, but i miserably fail.

However, the point is: would you let a female officer ALONE with her gun? Or do they actually need to be escorted to prevent random guys from assaulting them and stealing their guns?

>>33346104
>same fagging

Does it bother you that much to know women are worse than men at everything?

>>33346117
Yes they need to be escorted.

>>33346092
Is she wearing makeup?

>>33346121
Well, what the hell is the point than? Wouldn't it be better if they just run with a baton instead of a firearm?

>>33346117
>However, the point is: would you let a female officer ALONE with her gun?

I don't even let females attempt to reverse park a car, let alone handle firearms.

File: 2ea78c4a482b4f571928cb84505358e5f6eb0b1391f825ec4e4f3542ccaf13ac_1.jpg (27KB, 500x390px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 500x390px

>this entire thread
So even when women are competent, they're still incompetent, is that what I'm supposed to take from this?

You people are worse than Turks, I swear.

Yes woman are often not quite that tuff physically but I served with a woman in military and she was a though one, if woman can handle the struggle why not?. And just look at Israel. Works pretty good as far as I know.

>>33346085

The last couple times France was in a major war, it really /was/ desperate to the point it needed everyone it could get its hands on that was willing to fight.

>>33346154
Is having a functioning sling the best test of competence?

>>33346154
She wasn't competent though. A man could have just beat the fucker down with the buttstock. She used the female's only defense mechanism in the wild, crying for daddy. In this case daddy was two real soldiers.

>>33346120
Does it bother you that I'm not? Does it bother you that men who actually get laid and have a woman don't act like a scared little boy when a lady does a "mans" job? Fuckin pussy lmao
Did mommy let daddy have his way with you too much and now you hate women? Do you fuck men because you are so threatened by a lady? fucking kek

>>33346239
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hrdDwvVgh3s

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=uRccPGtP370

http://abc7ny.com/news/exclusive-police-scuffle-with-homeless-man-at-port-authority/1667208/

> A man could have just beat the fucker down with the buttstock

Oh boy look at all these grown and train men struggling to subdue one person. Yep. Sooooooo easy for them.

>>33346226
Article says she held onto the gun.

>>33346239
. . .

>>33346241
Holy projecting batman.

Are you okay dude?

>>33346259
to be fair soldiers are supposed to be much more well trained than police and if an unarmed man walks up to you while you have a rifle in your hands then tries to take it from you, then I would expect a much faster reaction than even letting him attempt to grab your gun. and that's not even a case of if a man would've done it better, this soldier should have known better

File: 1274057230292.jpg (54KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 600x450px

>>33346130
>only knows stupid weak girls
probably a stupid weak manlet

>>33346263
At first it says he got it away then got shot, later it says she held onto it, as if making a specific point to mention that.

It's probably propaganda lies and she lost the weapon.

>>33346316
>class meant to deal with dissidence
>know better
if he wanted the gun bad enough he could disarm any operator
/pol/ plz go

File: 1this.gif (446KB, 300x186px) Image search: [Google]

446KB, 300x186px

>>33346154

>>33346316
An airport is a very crowded place, people walking up to those soldiers is probably a common occurrence.

>>33346337
>At first it says he got it away
No it doesn't, only thing we know is he grabbed it.

From the video, it sounds like he grabbed the gun in one hand, her throat in the other, and when the two were struggling, a shot was fired from the gun, probably either by accident or by her. Then they probably separated, she got him away from her, and that's when the other soldiers shot him.

>>33346241
You do seem bothered though...

File: assburger pointing something out.png (59KB, 442x768px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 442x768px

>>33346280
I still struggle with accepting the fact that there are people who unironically go apeshit trying to defend women (or rather, their own idea of women) in the internet. It isn't a hyperbole or something, I virtually feel the barrier in my brain that refuses to acknowledge the fact that people can be this... I don't know, naive? Stupid? Plain retarded?

File: 4564564.jpg (34KB, 333x500px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 333x500px

>>33346031
Good example why guns ownership must require physical fitness test. Otherwise gun owner would endanger himself and bystanders, gun could be easily wrestled from him/her.

>>33346073

>don't violate my safezone: the post

>>33346073
>>33346092
>long hair
>soldier
Dat mistake.

>>33346468
>Dr. Fatass, I'm F.I.T., y...you don't get to bring french fries

File: 1489298748722.webm (2MB, 800x330px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 800x330px

>reddit posters triggered.

>>33346468

>the weak should not have the right to defend themselves

git out

my girl is a dalawa (2nd degree) in modern arnis. I've seen her break some dude's ribs because he grabbed her by the back of the neck.

I have zero fighting training, just the dozen or so bullshit brawls every dude is bound to get into in their life.

She'd probably do about as well as me in a fight, maybe better. She's just at a major disadvantage being 5'4" and half my weight.

>>33347430
probably should've drew that gun off the bat instead of trying to take 8 dudes down with a fucking stick.

Being a dumbass will fuck you faster than being weak any day of the week.

>>33346073
Not every country is a moronic shithole who's idea of "progression" is fucking up their army to near pathetic levels.

>>33346316
> soldiers are supposed to be much more well trained than police

No. Soldiers are trained to do soldier shit. Police are trained to do police shit. Expecting soldiers to interact with civilians like a cop would is a huge mistake.

>>33346241
> Projection

>>33347504
I think it was a British officer

File: 123.jpg (47KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 540x960px

>>33346031
>>She managed to keep hold of the gun

Oh did she?

>>33347616
>Expecting soldiers to interact with civilians like a cop would is a huge mistake.

There's a reason we passed Posse Comitatus and this is it.

>>33347680

Women police officers BTFO

>>33346031
>The soldiers were part of the Sentinelle special forces, an elite military group installed around France to protect sensitive sites after a string of deadly extremist attacks.

>Sentinelle
>elite military group
Oh god my sides, why hadn't anyone told me the guardian was so hilarious.

Apparently the guy was on some woman in the force-hating rampage, he had shoot a female police officer earlier.
I hope he REEEEEE'd while trying to wrestle the gun.

File: MANNER-5.jpg (30KB, 370x450px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 370x450px

>>33347680
>>>She managed to keep hold of the gun
>Oh did she?
I wonder who could be behind that post.....

>>33346073
>18th century standards
And when was the last time you guys won a real war?

>>33347616
Not properly IT. And the context is Italy in the 70s, so, this probably will be commented as some shitty situation.

BUT, still i'm reporting., There were a high number of cases where conscripted soldiers (folks with 0 training) were put in front of some army compound, with a weapon, and the order to defend that area from any attempt from criminals to steal the weapons inside (those where the years of the Brigate Rosse, and there was a great demand for weapons). Fast forwards, those soldiers happened to shoot and kill criminals (young ans stupid, but also dangerous and potential murders) who were trying to trespass the perimeter.
We had judges sentencing them to prison for felony murder.

>>33347430

What's the film/tv show called?

>>33347474
>just the dozen or so bullshit brawls every dude is bound to get into in their life

i've literally never been in a fight or felt like I was going to be

not everyone is a retarded ape that picks fights with people

>>33346120
daily reminder, last year's Time Magazine Woman of the Year was a man.

women can't even cook or clean as well as men. we just let them because we are busy with more important things.

the only things they can do that men cannot is give birth. I'm convinced that as soon as we can invent an artificial incubation machine, we will be able to do even that with more skill.

>>33346031
How badly do you have to fuck up as a father that your daughter wants to be a soldier or police officer?

>>33348907
fag

>>33347680
Is this real?

Did he get the gun?

File: implying.jpg (50KB, 676x720px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 676x720px

>>33347504
>British officers have guns

Here's the rundown of what happened, for those who genuinely care : he came at them by behind, grabbed her by the neck and put his gun to her head, said he was there to die for Allah. She struggled as he tried to take her FAMAS, they went to the ground, he managed to pry the weapon away from her and at that very moment as he was getting back up, the other two took advantage of the window of opportunity he retardedly offered them and put him down for good.
So, to sum up, she's behind attacked from behind, has a gun pointed right at her temple and yet takes no shit from the guy and wrestles with him for 2' and a half. And instead of praising her massive pair of balls and rejoyce in the elimination of a fucking terrorist, you manage to turn this into shit-flinging about the place of women in armed forces ??
It speaks volume of the mindset of some of you. I sincerely hope masturbating about how you would have totally seen it coming and how you would have totally not waddled in a pool of your own urine with a gun against your head makes you feel better, because that level of insecurity is disheartening.

>>33350396
So she couldn't hold onto her gun and had to be saved by her male colleagues?

>>33350396
Thanks for the heads up. If this is really how it went down, then she was really brave indeed.

>>33346217

The Russians also used female soldiers in WWII.

File: female ghostbusters toys.jpg (365KB, 1344x812px) Image search: [Google]

365KB, 1344x812px

>>33346326
>t. bulldyke

>>33350396
>she takes no shit

Judging by how many times the story has changed I would guess they are doing everything possible to make her seem like a hero

>>33346073

Maybe you should have picked a different example, because the Swedish military is a complete shitshow.

>>33346031
in the UK the armed police at airports operate in pairs. so if a small group wanders past then the would be very easy for them to be rushed, grabbede and stabbed (non-metal knives obvs). you now have a squad of probably muzzies in a crowded location with at leats 4 firearms and the cops radios.amazed it hasn't happened already.

>>33350502
>>33350440
That's from the attorney's report. But please, go on, keep making this about how she's equipped with a vagina. I know, I know, it's a scary place, all hollow and fleshy and you're not allowed in. Brr.

>>33350511
Let's be honest, for the most part terrorist groups aren't really that good at planning attacks outside their own country. I mean they happen don't get me wrong, it's just hard to coordinate a plan like that and not get caught. Which is lucky for us.

File: Mila-Kunis-Laughing-And-Wiping-The-Tears-Away-Reaction-Gif.gif (490KB, 500x200px) Image search: [Google]

490KB, 500x200px

>>33346031
>Op creates this thread to prove how brave and stronk female soldier is because she managed to hold onto her weapon

>turns out she couldn't

File: IMG_5122.png (508KB, 1900x1111px) Image search: [Google]

508KB, 1900x1111px

>>33350626
Too bad she wasn't a big strong manly man like you right anon?

>>33350581
Why would they care about getting caught? Wouldn't they be trying to inflict casualties and possibly trying to get sent to their awaiting virgins?

>>33350675
I'm a girl actually which is how I know women don't belong in the military

>>33350692
In the planning process not the execution of it. Hard to earn those virgins when intelligence networks get wind of what you're doing.

File: IMG_6407.jpg (73KB, 600x450px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 600x450px

>>33350726
>women on 4chan
And only an idiot would think women have literally no place in the military.

>>33350756
Its been proven though, the Marines did a study on it and it was pretty conclusive

Plus there is the mountain of circumstantial evidence like in from op

>>33350781
>marines did a study on women it
Yeah, as combat troops. Turns out not every job in the military is being a door kicking, lead slinging, pipe hitter.

There's literally no reason women can't fill support roles.

Also as circumstantial evidence this is terrible. There's nothing to suggest that this wouldn't have happened to a man. Hell, the core principal of the Army combative program is basically what happened here; grapple with your attacker till your buddy can come up and shoot them in the face.

Turns out the best way to win a fist fight is to have a buddy with a gun.

>>33350825
The study showed they are slower and are injured more

Why would you have them in support roles when you can have a man doing the same job faster with less chance of needing to be replaced or receive medical attention?

You would pay less per soldier and have a better group of soldiers altogether

>Hell, the core principal of the Army combative program is basically what happened here; grapple with your attacker

Do they also tell you to give your attacker your rifle?

>>33347680
That clearly isn't Orly airport.
>Poorfags

>>33350781
They're pretty good pilots from what I have heard

>>33350740
Well maybe they're over planning? It took some anon 5 minutes to figure out that if you have a gang of wanna-be-dead mudslimes walking through an airport they could possibly disarm a couple of armed police. Sure it's sloppy and will possibly end up in less than desirable results but it doesn't take much planning.

You fags go walk through X busy place where there are some armed cops, beat them up, take their shit and wreck some shit.

Then again you could argue it's less than desirable for their whole movement to create violence, and thus scrutiny, in places they're still trying to up their own populations in.

>>33350902
Because we run a volunteer army and you'll run out of men.

>>33350902
>The study showed they are slower and are injured more
Yeah at combat shit. Like I said not every job is combat arms.

>men are going to be faster
At what? Doing maintenance on an engine? Filing paperwork? Getting an IV placed in a hospital? Managing a supply warehouse? Turns out strength isn't really that necessary for a lot of jobs in the military. And unbelievably women can be decent at those jobs.

>but her rifle got taken
After she wrestled the guy for 2 minutes after being attacked from behind, oh and he got shot immediately after. I fail to see how you know a man would do better, or how you even consider this a failure.

>>33346073
Not every country is the most powerful military in the world either, anon.

>>33351024
This guy gets it. I don't give two shits about women in support roles, but I sure as shit wouldn't turn down the opportunity to smash bitches in supply.

File: female turkish soldier.jpg (42KB, 470x674px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 470x674px

>>33346154
The turks are ok with female soldiers though.

I have no problem having women serving in any role in the military, combat roles included, as long as they pass the same tests that men have to. So far the vast majority of them cannot pass for infantry type jobs, and thats fine.

Just don't go full retard and lower the standards.

>>33351121
This to be honest.

Only question is whether those standards were originally developed to be relative or absolute- were they meant to be a male performance standard, or were they meant to be a combat performance standard?

The former should be changed to the latter OR have a second set of standards developed in the same vein for women.
The latter should not be changed & women who cannot meet it should not be allowed to serve in combat roles.

Simple as that.

>>33350992
Planning isn't exactly the hard part. Coordination and recruitment is. Getting 4 guys willing to die for Allah together for an attack like that is kind of hard to do without raising red flags.

Not to mention as simple as the plan is you'll still want to do recon and rehearsals to maxamzie the plans potential.

>>33351068
>fucking military whores
>decides she wants to accuse you of rape
You're risking a lot.

>>33351180
>Only question is whether those standards were originally developed to be relative or absolute- were they meant to be a male performance standard, or were they meant to be a combat performance standard?

Why would there be such a thing as a male performance standard in the military before there were women in it? There wasn't a differentiation in combat performance expectation until AFTER women were allowed into the military.

>>33351468
If it's just a means to maintain general fitness, they'd have set the bar according to what their soldiers (all men) could attain with training & discipline.
So no fatties/disabled/anorexic weaklings, but a below-average man could have a place if he became & stayed fit.
If this was the case, they'd need a new standard set for women, since it was set with only men in mind & doesn't actually have to do with combat performance.

If it was a means to maintain a minimum level of actual combat capability- being able to hoist the average soldier & carry them x yards, being able to truck all your gear x distance in x time, women should get no slack if they can't meet those requirements, same as small men.

Understand?

>>33347680

time to meme ask:

>Is that a famas?.

>>33351579
So something like a universal combat performance expectation, but different expectations for male and female POGs?

>>33347438
The weak should fear the strong.

File: 1454122076136.jpg (54KB, 324x289px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 324x289px

>>33347430
Hot

>>33351668
Nope, if it's universal it's universal.

There should only be different expectations if it isn't a universal combat performance expectation but instead a personal fitness expectation.

File: IMG_8573.jpg (125KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

125KB, 1280x720px

>>33346109
MG42, because 8mm Mauser is obviously superior.

>>33351797
>a personal fitness expectation.
Why would there be personal fitness expectations in the military? It's a formal organization not some militia.

Really I don't understand anything you're trying to get across.

>>33346095
lmao I think her arms are bigger than the dude's

>>33351024
>fail to see how it can be considered a failure

Retaining the rifle was enough of an accomplishment to warrant this thread so the fact that it was lost is a failure

File: C7Mku3bXwAA6_Cw.jpg large.jpg (107KB, 1024x701px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 1024x701px

>>33346031
>>She managed to keep hold of the gun

No she did not.

The guy actually stole the famas, made a run for the nearest mcdonald and got shot by security/police.

Oh yeah, and it look like he tried to copycat actual terrorists.

File: 1474858987030.jpg (41KB, 307x386px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 307x386px

>>33348907
>same sex reproduction could easily come within our lifetime
all male martian colony when?

>>33348907
>women can't even cook

This^ Gordon Ramsay is the world's best chef.

>>33346031
>a wittingly identification of the weakest... operator?
Sort of. The attacker was a goatfucker, and those guys target women and children for everything because their stupid religion has taught them that women are subhumans who can't fight back.

>>33354495
well their religion has taught them well on at least one of those counts

>>33350396
I was going to call you a french Marxist shill, but then i see the name.

faggots don't even hide anymore.

>>33347474
>just the dozen or so bullshit brawls every dude is bound to get into in their life

Never been in a fight. Not unless you count wrestling with my friends when I was ten.

>>33350505
That's a Norwegian.

File: 1466542597106.jpg (59KB, 480x461px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 480x461px

Maybe should not have allowed a group of people whose way of life goes against the very fabric of your civilization and this problem would never have happened. Of course this applies to the U.S. too.
>be civilized
>group celebrates being uncivilized and trying to destroy civilization
>continue to cater to this group
envious as fuck though to what the mil patrol is carrying. fucking stupid muh feels U.S. laws

>>33346031
>Do you think it was just a cause that a female soldier was targeted by somebody willing to steal a soldier's weapon, or was it according to a a wittingly identification of the weakest... operator?

What makes you think that someone dumb enough to try stealing a gun out of the hands of a soldier was operating with some sort of high-level tactical plan?

>>33348590

G.B.H. 2012

>>33355522
You say that like there's a difference

>>33351956
Even if they were women's muscle is less dense than men's.

>>33346031
>She managed to keep hold of the gun
it's difficult to steal a rifle with a sling around a person or a pistol from a safety holster. What's the big deal?

File: 1478300143937.png (530KB, 852x445px) Image search: [Google]

530KB, 852x445px

>>33346163
Israel discontinued any females in combat units because it was a disaster

>>33346374
>common occurence
White people are not retarded enough to just walk up to any armed personnel, only niggers do that

File: 164892946.jpg (9KB, 257x254px) Image search: [Google]

9KB, 257x254px

How much of a beta cuck do you have to be to whiteknight women that you don't know on some anonymous internet forum?

>>33346117

Police patrols in our capital are frequently all female units, for the last decade. There's yet to be a disarming event.

>>33351070
>The turks are ok with female soldiers though.
Is that supposed to mean something? Theyre one of the lowest forms of filth and barely human. The idea that they accept the other half of their population into military service is not helping you at all.

>>33350396

Thanks. Nice to get some actual facts in a sea of otherwise bait.

>>33350396

By the way, if you can clarify this - she was wrestling the attacker for two and a half minute before getting backup?

>>33347680

Incidentally, the gazillion press pictures show a man lying on a wide open floor. Wearing a black jacket.

>>33350902

Oh wait I get it. It's a USMC report. Meaning they tested AMERICAN women.

>>33354495

Also, if the above info is correct, he was targeting the soldier who was not having an armed buddy standing two foot away. That makes sense regardless of gender or size.

>>33356330

Well, for one thing the picture was taken in the Norwegian camp in Afghanistan.

File: 1294417409488.jpg (8KB, 251x250px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 251x250px

>>33350924
Then why are there so few female pilots?
Why did the first female F-14 pilot die when trying to land on a carrier?

>>33350997
>run out of men
You can't be serious.

>>33357386
Are American women now somehow different from other women?

They seem to be pretty comparable in international sporting events so you are going to need a pretty good argument to try and imply that they are somehow more disadvantage than other women

Summing it up. Muslim guy with pistol attacks a single soldier from behind and tries to disarm her with a barrel to her brow. She fights him even so for two minutes while not letting go of her own gun, until her companions join her.

And the pic of one guy on the floor with gun is not only another guy but he wears different clothes and went down at a different airport at different time.

Lady soldier did good. So, we are done here then?

>lady soldier did good
no she fucking didn't or else she would have shot him herself.
Also stop fucking namefagging and spamming your delusions in this thread.

File: IMG_3746.png (206KB, 390x443px) Image search: [Google]

206KB, 390x443px

>>33357779
Kinda to shoot someone when that sneak up behind you and point a pistol to your temple dumbass

>>33357731

Heh. No. That was unfair of me and I should have held my tongue. Only, my Norwegian Army is doing universal conscription now and so far the women conscripts are scoring better in many areas than their male counterparts. So, just a bit of nationalism there. For that I apologize.

>>33357762
The official story doesn't make sense, she wrestles with him for over two minutes and the second he gets of from her someone is there to save the day?

Someone is covering something and losing your weapon is not doing good, though through womens mental gymnastics she obviously deserves a medal and a national holiday

Lets bring more terrorists into our countries
What could go wrong

Never before has civil war or conflict ever happened, we just have to put our fingers in our ears & chant diversity is our strength

>>33357786
>women are scoring better

Sauce? Have they actually done any studies of mixed units vs all male units?

>>33357785
If he had a gun to her head the entire time why didn't he straight up shoot her?
If it was a surprise attack why not take her out from behind?
Nothing adds up, this whole thing seems very manufactured.

>>33357786
Norwegian men are shitty soldiers, we already knew this

>>33357779

I hate to tell you but Chuck Norris and Bruce Lee were movie actors, Arnold Schwarzenegger isn't actually a combat robot from the future and Bruce Willis have never been in actual combat. Anyone keeping their shit together when ambushed is a tough guy of the real type.

>>33357834
Did she keep her shit together? She was originally supposed to have kept her rifle too

>>33357807
Are you expecting a dumbass who tried to grab a gun from soldier to think smart

>>33357834
Are you 12?
Soldiers are trained to be tough. They are not trained to let random civilians take away their guns. What the fuck is she doing in the army if she can't even beat a fucking civilian?

>>33357790

Try again. She's fighting him, two other guys comes running, and the moment they are divided the other guys shoot at the civilian with a gun who just attacked a soldier. Sheesh... and here I though *I* had a touch of paranoia.

>>33357806

Off my memory, the percentage of female soldiers completing their duty year is higher than the male one. I don't remember the rest and I am not going on a research rampage.

>>33357829

Son... you're gonna need bigger bait.

>>33357786
How do your fitness standards compare to the American women's?

>>33357851

The only 'proof' so far provided that she let go of her gun, proved to be a pic from a different shooting. Also she didn't surrender her gun, didn't freeze when she was ambushed, and didn't shoot wildly around herself potentially killing civilians. Could you do better, Superman?

>>33357855

Have you actually ever been to an airport? Real life is not a computer game. Besides, she didn't let her gun be taken or herself be taken hostage.

>>33357870
>Off my memory, the percentage of female soldiers completing their duty year is higher than the male one

So you have an unmotivated conscript force. Do the women actually score higher anywhere else or do they just sit around for longer

>>33357895
You forgot to add that she is a woman and did all those things. I think that alone merits a medal of honor.
Women can do anyhing men can do but better!

>>33346239
>I am an insecure manchild who can barely read and write enough to post on 4chan.
She held onto the gun nigger.

File: 1391783[1].jpg (162KB, 990x660px) Image search: [Google]

162KB, 990x660px

>>33357880

Do you mean, comparing the average Norwegian woman to the US counterpart or comparing their military counterparts?

>>33357935
It should have been attached with a sling, holding on simply means not lifting your arm up

So strong

>>33357942
Still holding on to it though. Just be happy a wanna be terrorist is dead.

>>33357939
I mean what are the fitness standards for women from either country

>>33357912

Conscripts used to have lukewarm motivation. Now it's a battle just to get accepted, because the army is small and they only take in the best fit and most motivated. No, duty length is the same for both groups.

>>33357916

I think her being a woman is not the essential part of this story. Lone soldier gets ambushed by armed man, and survives. It's an admirable feat regardless.

Please stop biting the namefag's obvious bait.

>>33348620
lucky you.

In some places retarded apes trying to pick a fight with you is a daily hazard.

>>33357440

Did no-one think about the risk of dropping an attractive blonde woman into an area infested with Pashtun boyfuckers?

>>33346092
Hate to pull this card, but he is stronger than the woman just because he's a man. Very few women are stronger than most men.

>>33358015

No worse than the risk of dropping an attractive young man into an area infested with Pashtun boyfuckers. In fact, probably less. It's not like they wander out alone on Saturday night to look for a party anyway.

>>33358017

We're not in the industrial era any more. The rank of people who can do 40 situps at any time are growing thin.

Targeting the lone soldier was smart, as in smarter than targeting two soldiers standing together. The seriously stupid part of it was that he already had a pistol and tried to take away her rifle when he could simply have shot her in her back first and then take the gun off her corpse. But since he thought she'd be weak he tried to use arm force instead. Good.

>>33358097
> The rank of people who can do 40 situps at any time are growing thin.


i think situps are the only exercise where women equal males. IF i recall correctly.

>>33358172
What about sprinting

>>33358279

I have no idea. I'm just recalling numbers i red for female and male pushups, situps and whatever. And situps numbers where close for the two genders.


maybe here

http://www.military.com/military-fitness/army-fitness-requirements/army-basic-training-pft

>>33358097
>We're not in the industrial era any more. The rank of people who can do 40 situps at any time are growing thin.


Also, if you can do 40 situps, you probably are doing them the wrong way.

>>33346073
I'd like to bend her over the hood of a car and show her my filth.

>>33358473
You should clean your car if it's filthy, anon.

>>33348553
Fuck. That is such bullshit.

>>33346073
>18th century standards.
You mean 20th century standards

>>33346130
This. I have two dents, one on each side, in my rear bumper because I made the mistake of thinking my wife could back out of a parking space.

>>33350461
As propaganda

>>33347430
This shouldn't give me a boner

>>33351289
Also the kind of people who go in for that type of thing are not usually the brightest of sparks. Most would be terrorists (including militiafags) are caught because they won't shut the fuck up.

>>33350396
>He put a gun to her head
Then why was he trying to disarm her instead of just executing her? Sounds like bullshit to me.

>>33350756
>And only an idiot would think women have literally no place in the military
They don't, and haven't, in all of recorded history except for a few desperate circumstances or small anomalies. It's simple biology that's being ignored in favor of fee fees.

>>33351121
Even the small margin that can pass to male standards only barely exceed the bare minimum standards. If you've been in the military you'd know that the bare minimum is not enough. You are expected to greatly exceed the minimum and only doing the minimum is a sign of weakness and failure.

tldr the strongest women are still weaker than the average man, especially in the military.

>>33357895
>shoot wildly around herself potentially killing civilians
Article says the weapon was discharged during the struggle.

>>33350825
>no reason women can't fill support roles
other than they are shitty at the job, out of all the females I have run across in the Army maybe 25% were competent and maybe 10% were both competent and capable. and the black females were the absolute worst at everything except being fat, they were very good at being fat.

File: 57824961.jpg (11KB, 558x418px) Image search: [Google]

11KB, 558x418px

>>33359141
It was a pellet gun ((?) dunno if it's the correct translation, imagine pic).
An hour before trying his stunt in the airport he used it to shoot at policemen during a roadside check.

>>33355755

Wise enough in an animalistic way to identify the weakest enemy, dogs can do it.

>>33358432
How fat are you? 40 sit ups is easy, even in slow motion

>>33350396
>ooh boo ooh look at me defending wimminz in the military as if my point of view is worth anything because I was in a shitty tank, look at how progressive and tolerant of a socialist I am

Pathétique

>>33359103
>He married a woman who can't drive

Lol, at least your genes won't bring hers down

>>33359109

Sure. All 800.000 of them. Of course the propaganda ministry used the opportunity. Wouldn't you?

>>33360237
Maybe he meant pull-ups

>>33360500

I meant situps. But it doesn't matter. I am merely indicating that the average man and woman's fitness of our modern world isn't exactly a result of hard work on the fields. We are keyboard users, not pitchfork lifters. The military's job should be to take sufficiently fit people, then train them until they are as good as necessary. I don't care if they are medal owning Olympics or not.

>>33360552
So you're shitposting. Alright then, carry on.

>>33358432
Nigga, wat?

>>33360552
40 is well below the minimum for males and females on the APFT. It's the only part of the test that's the same for the two genders. 40 pushups is not an Olympian feat you moron.

>>33360685

Let's try the facts: http://www.military.com/military-fitness/army-fitness-requirements/army-pft-sit-up-score-chart

>>33360748
It's been a while, I thought it was 53 across the board. In any case, you're still amazingly wrong about the herculean feat of 40 fucking sit ups.

>>33360846
Sorry. I am just really gay and have nowhere to go so i shitpost on the internet

>>33350396
*citation needed

>>33347430
is this an educational video for police officers?

>>33360314
Most women can't drive. If you're not a better driver than a woman then you're the one who should be worrying about passing down their genes.

File: Cantiniere_in_Algeria_1845.jpg (42KB, 510x650px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 510x650px

>>33346031
I want a qt french army gf.

>>33351874
Can't do a pullup?
Pray to god that your parachute doesn't get entangled in trees during a botched landing.

Want to get a faster promotion? That MFP badge would look mighty fine on your application.

Decent PT scores wouldn't hurt either.

>>33346031
People are dumb, and insist upon denying historical evidence, biological evidence, and common sense because they FEEL this or that way.

Just wait until their is a serious war, and mixed gender units are put into action - men fighting over women, women fighting over men, men trying to save the women, women breaking down and crying, Chinese soldiers raping them and posting the videos online.

Men and women are different. As as soon as you put a women with a group of men, you have the foundation for a society. Now the military is not functioning like a machine.

Also, imagine 2 societies: (i) one where the women have children, the children learn their nation's history, the meaning of its laws, and fight together to preserve their common way of life; (ii) in the second, the women are fighters, immigrants are imported by the boat load to supplement the population, who don't know the country's history, nor share its values, etc.

Why do you think the US keeps losing wars to Arabs with rusty AK's in flipflops?