Why are Americans the worst offenders when it comes to moder

Because they're the most active military in recent times that would actually record and report those numbers.

because they're jumpy as fuck and slightly more poorly trained than most other countries conventional troops

Because they can afford to swing their dicks around. If we don't like it, we ought to stop being little bitchboys, start doing shit on our own and then we can swing our dicks around and complain.

It's only friendly fire when you do it by accedent

the murricans don't do friendly fire

>>33271154
They think numbers and equipment are a replacement for training.

>>33271245
>>33271188
>europoors mad they have absolutely useless weak ass militaries so they try to use the excuse "muh training" to make them think their better.

Top fucking kek.

Most of these euros that say this shit have conscripts as the bulk of their military too.

>>33271258
P.S how can the US have horrible training when we have been in constant warb conflict for the last few decades? Wartime creates experienced soldiers which in term create competent trainers and training. How can any euro kek claim they have better training when their militaries do jack diddly squat?

Notice how the vast majority of these are from A10s and bombers? American infantry dont honestly blue on blue any worse than any other modern military, but their flyboys are dangerous retards.

>>33271154
Because we keep track. Same reason why people believe vaccines cause autism.

>out of 26 incidents of FF
>19 were caused by europoors
>vast majority of the offenders were British

Oh yeah, America sucks alright.

File: slamev.jpg (78KB, 576x720px) Image search: [Google]

78KB, 576x720px

>>33271154

GO BACK TO YOUR MOSQUE AND SUCK ALLAH COCK YOU SAND MONKEY CAMEL JOCKEY GOAT FUCKING PIECE OF SHIT

File: _1450263521984.jpg (875KB, 2120x2440px) Image search: [Google]

875KB, 2120x2440px

>>33271154

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_friendly_fire_incidents#World_War_II

>ctrl+f "Hawker Typhoon"

>>33271358
>ctrl+f "RAF "
>50 results
>ctrl+f "USAAF"
>5 results
note you have to add a space after RAF in order to get the british incidents, otherwise you just get the raf in strafed

>>33271333
You were the most prolific in Afghan and Iraq

>>33271258
He's right though, your pilots are poorly trained. We've had around 5 USAF crashes near me over the last few years for pilot error. Our own pilots don't crash flying the same flight paths, why is that?

It's either pilot error or your equipment is shit?

>>33271154
Because we're more honest about reporting than other countries.

>>33271470

Pilots are officers, not enlisted, and he is also not a soldier, but an airman.

American pilots have more flight time and more money as a whole invested into them, so its unlikely that training is the reason. Perhaps you should look into why these pilots are crashing, maybe it is something else.

>>33271470
Real talk, it's that the equipment is getting older and needs to get replaced. That's why the F-35 is coming out. Not only that but the higher ops tempo might have something to do with it.

>>33271487
A lot of your FF happens against non US personal, you can be sure those countries will be the first to report it.

In fact a person i know was killed in Afghan by friendly fire from a USAF jet.

It got to the point where no one wanted to call in US air support in case they got bombed.

>>33271503
>>33271509
One of the cases was a bird strike on a blackhawk which killed all 5 inside, but apart from that one i don't think explanations have been given for the jets that keep going down. F-15/ FA-18.

One F-15 articles mentions
>The report said the pilot carried out a manoeuvre that was an "inappropriate response to conditions" and which "over-controlled the aircraft"

http://www.bbc.co.uk/news/uk-england-suffolk-31867486

File: images (3).jpg (6KB, 225x225px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 225x225px

Because America can afford real bullets

>>33271774
So can the taliban, you know the ones they kill Americans with.

>>33271784
And the ones Muslims shoot up European women with?

Oh wait those are a different kind of "bullet"

>>33271154

Is there any military in the world that reaches the operational rate of America?

With more operations comes more accidents, mistakes, etc.

>>33271903
Yeah those ones like Islamists use in America

You know these ones
www.thereligionofpeace.com/attacks/american-attacks.aspx

>>33271904
UK and Russia

>>33271154

It's pretty simple

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Coalition_casualties_in_Afghanistan

To October 2015 there were 3,407 coalition deaths in Afghanistan, of which 2,271 were from the USA. The USA was simply involved in far more combat, it also provided the majority of the air support.

>>33271784
Are you implying muslims don't have friendly fire (when allah wills it)
Or are you implying muslims keep track, report, and publish their mistakes?

Or were you implying Germany literally doesn't yell bang for training exercises?

>>33271154
Because we are 90% of the world's fire. Bound to get a little blue on blue every once in a while

File: IMG_7032.jpg (87KB, 579x326px) Image search: [Google]

87KB, 579x326px

>>33271276
>In constant conflict for the last few decades
Kek, come back to me when you can claim to pretty much have been in constant conflict for the last few centuries like the UK. Plus, the UK has been just as active as the US as we've been there with you guys fighting the same wars for the past few decades. But we're allies anyway so there's not much point in comparing dicks.

No one else goes to war. And it's hard tell if the opposing side had friendly fire if they are all dead or a POW.

>>33272302
I'm implying that 99% of the world can afford bullets.

>>33272558
Jesus you're retarded.

File: R-RULE BRITANIA.gif (220KB, 500x220px) Image search: [Google]

220KB, 500x220px

>>33272367
real good fuckin job with your centuries of perpetual war, faggot

>>33273080
Thanks. As far as empires go, we did pretty fucking good.

>>33275135
Really set the speed record on expansion and implosion. Gold star, dad.

>>33271245
That's China you're thinking of. Us actually spends more time and money on training than every other military on earth