AR Thread / AR General /arg/

File: P_20170310_150206.jpg (3MB, 4160x2340px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x2340px

Post roll marks

File: 1473219993058.jpg (1MB, 2446x3030px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2446x3030px

i hate roll mark debates

File: Lol223.jpg (3MB, 4160x3120px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x3120px

>>33266655
Custom rollmark master race

File: 1 simple trick to make poorfags HATE you!.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>33266649
>i pay more for things like a good goy but can't tell you why i do it because i refuse to acknowledge every lower is the same piece of 7075 T6 aluminum and the only thing that makes them unique is a random etching on the left side


God I fucking hate rollmarkfags so much. Literally the only way you could care about rollmarks outside of clones is because you're trying to justify your retarded purchases or refuse to acknowledge you paid extra for a pretty mark

>all this from someone who makes fun of people with b5 stocks

File: IMG_5669.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>33266655
According to some other anons lurking ITT roll marks have no meaning or value whatsoever

File: 20170302_100421 (2017x1135).jpg (1MB, 2017x1135px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2017x1135px

>>33266632
fuck your lists

>>33266667
cuz your lower is shit :^)

>>33266655
Your lower is no better than an Anderson, it just has a different rollmark. Congrats on wasting money you fucking idiot.

File: IMG_5118.jpg (39KB, 466x522px) Image search: [Google]

39KB, 466x522px

>>33266689

File: IMG_20160910_124634693.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

>>33266699
look closer

>>33266684
>mega arms
More like mega trash. Should have just got an Anderson, it's the same thing, roll marks don't matter. Retard.

>>33266699
Go get a Mega Arms reciever set, and an Anderson reciever set and then tell me there isn't any difference.

You're a dumbass. This isn't even taking into account things like how rare or sought out some are.

File: lmt-best-roll.jpg (269KB, 1024x1023px) Image search: [Google]

269KB, 1024x1023px

>>33266655

>>33266713
yes, very ugly rollmark

>>33266714
>I've never had a Mega in my hand ever

File: u wot m8(1resized).gif (1MB, 300x144px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 300x144px

>>33266620
yes it should if it only have one crossbolt it only need one slot. but i recommend at least 3 slot for better surface contact with mounting area on the vfg for more strength opposite to one slot and two bump that would probably be able to be teared off by hand after bolting it on


but DD furniture are known to be brittle garbage buy something else.

>>33266621
>this

he probably went like this in local grocery store

> cashier goes " that will be $35.87 please"
> anon hand cashier a dollar
> cashier goes "sir this is only one dollar"
> anon goes "this is identical to 50 buck only thing different is what is printed on it"
> cashier goes pic related.

File: 20170304_103109.jpg (3MB, 3736x1259px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3736x1259px

>>33266672
I like the flared magwell

I'll probably leave something out
UPPER:
Aero upper
Geiselle mk4 13"
BA midlength 14.5"
A2 (need to replace)
DD fixed front
Magpul pro rear sight
Aimpoint PRO
aero upper parts kit
Raptor ambi CH
Streamlight rail mount + tapeswitch

LOWER:
Aero Lower
CMMG LPK minus FCG
Geiselle SSAE
KAK buffer tube assembly (tube, qd socket endplate, buffer and spring)
Magpul STR
Magpul K grip
Bad lever
Magpul MS4

Liberal amounts of Krylon

>>33266731
Don't need to because all the lowers are the same, so rollmarks are just meme and don't matter.

>this fucking retard >>33266718

>>33266740
>empirical evidence posted in the last thread that basically every receiver is the same
>rollmark fags who have only ever held one receiver will still argue

Kek

File: Screenshot_20161120-202426.jpg (526KB, 1018x670px) Image search: [Google]

526KB, 1018x670px

I, too, am special

>>33266714
> zero receiver wobble
> wobby motherfucker trash

nope.. i dont see any different. huh wait a sec. oh nevermind yeah theres no different between them.
-anon

> i am aware that i have been baited hard.

>>33266740
I wish that anon would come back and say that again.
"Muh anderson, muh same material, it doesn't matter, hue hue hue"

>>33266762
Yes, I am trolling, because saying all receivers are the same is a fucking stupid thing to say.

>>33266753
>>rollmark fags who have only ever held one receiver will still argue


only person that have not held more than one brand of receiver if anybody ITT its you.

-guy who lost count of amount receiver he has held

File: 20170310_183138-01.jpg (2MB, 3923x2206px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3923x2206px

This isn't even my final form probably.

>>33266765
he's here>>33266753

>>33266765
You're still mad?

>>33266776
I'm sure you have bud


http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_3_12/318113_AR_Lower_Receiver_FAQ__56k_beware__MMS__CMT__LAR__LMT_compared___.html

Give me some evidence that there are differences in receivers then. I'm literally waiting for any of you faggots to tell me how any of them are different without using money as an argument

>>33266746
You're just proving my point with every single post. Please keep going

>all companies use the same process to make lowers
>all companies have the same QC
>all companies have the same tolerances
>Anderson makes everything for everyone and they just re brand it

Again, this isn't even taking into account things like rarity or demand. You know, like supply and demand?

>mfw DD = PSA but people spend 4x cuz dey dumb

>>33266785
Looks like we found him again:
>>33266786

>>33266772
>all receivers are the same is a fucking stupid thing to say.

this is in fact correct.

they are all functional until they are so out of spec that they arent but some are above another in fit n finish, quality, value, material used, feature, yaadadadad

>hurr durr all lowers are the same
look at these fucking differences
http://www.ar15.com/forums/t_3_12/318113_AR_Lower_Receiver_FAQ__56k_beware__MMS__CMT__LAR__LMT_compared___.html

Hmmmmmm

I just learned I can easily fit 31 rounds into either of my lancer 30's

Hmmmmmmmmm

>>33266798
>>all companies use the same process to make lowers
>implying most companies even make their own lowers

>>33266803
BTFO
T
F
O

>>33266740
>anon goes "this is identical to 50 buck only thing different is what is printed on it"

CG just BTFO'd you.

hey /k/, I'm working on upgrading my first AR. I've got a palmetto state kit mil-spec m4, which would you prioritize first? optic? hand guard? pistol grip? something else?

>>33266798
>Rolls Royce is the same az Bently is the same as Mercedes is the same as Volvo is the same as Toyota because they all have four wheels and drive
>they just buy expensive cars because dey dum
No, it's because they aren't poor and can afford such luxuries.

>>33266801
I'm not anon, though. I'm just observing.

>>33266786
They're not gonna post anything to back up what they have to see, they still haven't shown there's any difference in any of them besides
>i-it costs more!

>>33266815
> forging
> machining and anodizing

same thing!

-retarded

>Aesthetic Rifle 15
>not shelling out for the best looking roll marks
I mean, what are you even doing here
I get AIDS from just being in the same room as an Anderson rollmark.

File: 20161225_105208.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

My Turner Armament < my Anderson < my Aero. The quality differences at obvious

>>33266807
now find out how many pennies fit in a washing machine

File: white whale.jpg (751KB, 1632x1224px) Image search: [Google]

751KB, 1632x1224px

>>33266655

>>33266827
Optic if you don't have one.

File: Screenshot_20170310-213717.png (453KB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

453KB, 1440x2560px

>>33266816
How are they BTFO?

>>33266847
Nuh-uh they're all the same lower. They just have different rollmarks. You're a dipshit for having spent different amounts for each one when you could have had 3 $50 Anderson lowers.

File: IMG_5776.jpg (45KB, 800x434px) Image search: [Google]

45KB, 800x434px

>>33266815
>implying the work is done after it's forged

>>33266857
I'm looking at a utg 3x, any thoughts on utg? is it airshit? or god cause the reviews say it's pretty nice as a starting point

>>33266827
>which would you prioritize first?
trigger

>>33266866
>implying they aren't all CNC machined to the same spec

>>33266827
No need to upgrade anything at all ever because all AR parts are basically the same

>>33266864
Kek That's not why I'm a dipshit at all

File: 1488433157560.jpg (788KB, 2048x2048px) Image search: [Google]

788KB, 2048x2048px

What a mess to walk into.

>>33266795
It's ambi.

>>33266873
NO NO NO

>>33266873
Basically airshit. If it's a part that you need to hold a zero or not break, I'd avoid using it on a real gun.

>>33266849
If I guess right do I win a prize

>>33266847
You mean the difference in quality is impossible to quantify right?

t. Guy on food stamps

>>33266878
>no need for QC or tolerance checks bc CNC machines and bits are infallible

Please buy a PSA PTAC and kys with it

>>33266894
No, he is saying the difference in quality is obvious. That is why he used comparison operators '<'

>>33266884
kek'd

We're trying to explain to some ponyfags that all the lowers are the same 7075 T6 aluminum and all come from the same place, but they insist that because it costs more it's somehow better

It's even funnier since this DPMS+CMMG is the smoothest AR I've come across, leagues better than the factory 6920 or FN-15 I've played with even. But most of that is in the BCG+CH

>>33266884
Surely ambi doesn't justify the 400% mark up? Right? Given the machining difference it should be like $15 right?

>>33266914
What is
>quality control
>finish (anodizing or otherwise)
>machining tolerances
>ROLLMARKS

>>33266860
different is different.

not same is not same

"same" is not "not same"

BTFO
T
F
O

> different lower hold value differently
> different lower are different shade of anodizing
> some have finish top anodizing
> some have superior machining and superior quality and superior quality control
> some doesn't allow receiver wooble

>>33266889
okay so just save up for the vortex/ better type? are there any good "budget" so to speak optics? cause I've got irons right now and can't hardly hit anything past 100 yds

File: 0c21ad74213de2aa4d5f67c5e18f069f_-colt-logo-colt-firearms-logo-clipart_720-893.jpg (113KB, 720x893px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 720x893px

>quality control

>>33266909
Yeah I know there are differences. I've actually handled andersons, and many other receivers. I'm also not on food stamps. I was LARPing as the welfare recipient itt

>>33266942
delet this

>>33266930
>qc
>magwell and trigger pocket

Really firing my walnuts right now

>>33266940
Strikefire II is probably one of the better poorfag optic choices

>>33266933
But the argument is that there's some sort of quality/functional difference. A Colt lower is going to perform the same as an Anderson, PSA, Aero, or KAC for all intents and purposes.

The OP even says there's no functional difference.

>>33266878
that's right they arent take a caliper to gunshop you will be shocked.

just wait until you handled HDSI or MEGA receiver you will be baffled and your knee will weaken.

remove yourself you filthy poorfag

>>33266930
Don't waste your time. I really think it's just trolling.

>>33266922
It's from a proprietary forging which adds to the cost
Comes with an LMT stock I think
2 stage KAC trigger is worth a bit
Plus the rest of your LPK, plus the fact they're desirable.

Don't compare a complete KAC lower to a $60 stripped Aero lower.

>>33266944
Is it accurate what they say about only three companies making lowers? could I get an Anderson and expect spike's tactical quality?

File: 1488083330349.png (36KB, 960x552px) Image search: [Google]

36KB, 960x552px

>>33266948

>>33266893
>guess
no, you count and report back with the number

>>33266940
http://www.primaryarms.com/primary-arms-advanced-micro-dot-with-push-buttons-and-up-to-50k-hour-battery-life-md-ads

>>33266632
I'm new to owning an AR and have no stockpile of ammo or magazines. Is this a good deal?
http://palmettostatearmory.com/ten-10-speer-223-remington-64gr-gold-dot-ammo-20rd-box-ten-10-magpul-pmag-30-5-56x45-mags.html?trk_msg=QM8VBQ9AP2CKJ4OV6FS1EUGQT4&trk_contact=7869AI6143P1H6QFVSSG0L2VFO&trk_sid=8G6K45KH43AOLH001IV5BDLTS4&utm_source=Listrak&utm_medium=email&utm_term=http%3A%2F%2Fpalmettostatearmory.com%2Ften-10-speer-223-remington-64gr-gold-dot-ammo-20rd-box-ten-10-magpul-pmag-30-5-56x45-mags.html

>>33266942
Need one that says 'cult'

>>33266958
Yes, it's been this way for a long time

>>33266958
No, that would be the case if the manufacturing stopped after the forge. But that isn't the case.

>>33266967
>Is this a good deal?
yeah if you don't mind your credit card getting stolen

>>33266950
If tolerance are shit in one, there is a difference, same with quality control, if the finish is applied poorly that will be a difference. These are functional diffs

>>33266967
Yes, that's good ammo too.

>>33266958
There seriously only a handful a companies that make 90% of the lowers on the market. I'm not memeing.

>>33266981
My card is only a few weeks from expiring anyway.

>>33266964
was hoping for a bit of magnification. what would a good 3-4x run?

>>33266996
then go for it

>>33266964
I really wish the warranty was better. That would solve... one of my problems

>>33266983
The fact we are even having this conversation rn is blowing my mind. It's trolling. I refuse to believe otherwise

>no need for KNS pins because all lowers are the same and made perfectly every time

>>33266983
>These are functional diffs
uhh no, they're not

>>33266979
how so?
>>33266993
How does that affect the quality? if I'm after a good lower to build from can I just buy an unmarked lower so

File: 1460680031455.jpg (72KB, 618x412px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 618x412px

does anyone have the sacrificed to 1000 bees by colts small arms division meme

>>33266998
The strikefire or spitfire has 3x version. Check em

>>33266940
Get a primary arms advanced micro dot. Around $180, accepts aimpoint mounts, 50,000 hour battery life. Lots of people here have had one at some point, and have spoken fondly of them.

>>33266998
http://www.primaryarms.com/primary-arms-1-6x-scope-patented-acss-308-reticle-advanced-combined-sighting-system-paps1-6x

>>33266955
It must be, I cannot comprehend how these poor fucks can honestly keep up the whole "they're all the same as the cheapest lower" facade. I think it is just to justify their own purchases and make themselves feel better...

>>33267012
>How does that affect the quality?
It doesn't really. They're almost all manufactured to the same spec and the manufacturing process is controlled by computers.

>>33267026
ACSS reticle is cluttered as fuck though

>>33267035
no it's not, stop regurgitating that meme

brb to play with retards later imma watch a movie.

>>33266984
Good for home defense?

>>33267012
See this pic>>33266866

That's what they look like after the forge.

>>33266950
>OP says poop tastes delicious
Go try it!

>>33266983
I'm still having trouble determining if you read that post or not. It's not a big deal if you only want to buy colt stuff, but I've never had a lower that didn't function at a portion of the cost.

You do you, boo.

>>33267035
yeah it is. you can find leupold mark ars for around that price

>>33267042
What movie?

>>33267043
Yep

File: SLR104 - Oldest.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

>>33267028
Are you saying the dude on ARFcom who bought a bunch of different lowers to compare them is a poorfag justifying his purchases?

>>33267041
But it is, I used to own one

>>33267051
Aren't the Mark ARs garbage too though? I remember hearing someone memeing them

>>33267068
never used one

>>33267050
I wouldn't spend the money on acolt, but I understand that different companies dont do things so similarly that there is no difference whatsoever

>>33267068
>Aren't the Mark ARs garbage too though? I remember hearing someone memeing them

No, all Leupolds are the same.
It's a fucking scope that you aim down and shoot. They all get close enough.

File: 20170310_172740.jpg (4MB, 2312x2826px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2312x2826px

>>33267035
Pretty sure you've never used one.

>>33267045
You need help. The guy was examining differences in the lowers. The only differences were finish and minor machining marks. There was no functional difference found. You'd be more appropriate in memeing if he had just stated an opinion, but he was examining objective differences and reporting them.

>>33267051
How's wildlands?

>>33267072
rip

Probably just gonna save my Neetbux for an Accupower then unless a comparable 1-8x gets put on the market at a better price point

>>33267079
Glass quality can be different though, have you tried using a bunch of different optics?

Reticle and illumination matters too

>>33267086
Nigger pls >>33267068

>>33266922
You can't buy them stripped from the factory, only ready to go.
Anodized finish is really well done.
Of course it's ambi.
Comes with Kac plate for additional QD point behind receiver.
Comes with LMT Sopmod stock.
Come with supposedly a nice trigger.
Bleh A grip
I don't think they're worth 800 but I got it for 500 without trigger(S3G was goinh in it anyway)so I'm happy.

File: IMG_4463.jpg (3MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4032x3024px

Hey boys

File: Tired.jpg (1MB, 1168x3968px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1168x3968px

>Lower
ECM 50-1 Billet Lower $250
A2 Grip $0
MBT $99
Seekins billet Mag release $6
springs, buffer tube and detents ~$50
Tax Stamp $200
VLTOR SASE-2 Plate $20
B5 Bravo $58
JP Captured Buffer $4140

>Upper
BCM CHF 11.5" Barrel $309
BCM Low Gasblock $45
Gas Tube $14
BCM Upper $119
BCM KMR-A 10" $179
MBUS PRO (front+rear) $160
SureFire M600p $230
HSP Thorntail $50
BCM Gunfighter VFG $19
Zenitco LCC-4 "Finger" $))))))
TA31F Green Chevron in ADI mount $1300/Aimpoint PRO in Aero cantilevered mount $450
SilencerCo 3Prong/Brake $89
BCM Gunfighter Mod 4 $50

File: 1481130046401.jpg (339KB, 1886x1414px) Image search: [Google]

339KB, 1886x1414px

>>33267079

>>33267086
eh its ok if you're playing with people you know

>>33267096
Nice Andersons

File: 1460834503622.png (31KB, 720x644px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 720x644px

>>33267092
>Probably just gonna save my Neetbux for an Accupower

>>33267086
Yup, there is totally no difference between lowers, so people who buy Mega Arms lowers are just getting jew'd hard.

>>33267028
It must be, I cannot comprehend how these sad fucks can honestly keep up the whole "they're not all the same as the more expensive lower" facade. I think it is just to justify their own purchases and make themselves feel better while temporarily filling a void with material goods..

File: 1368230772891.jpg (34KB, 500x330px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 500x330px

>>33267098
>JP Captured Buffer $4140
This should be $140

>mfw $3837 for all of these parts

>>33267101
I bet she paid too much for that. Should have got a Rohm

>>33267114
>I repeat. I've never even seen a Mega lower irl

File: 1480445803562.jpg (292KB, 756x1152px) Image search: [Google]

292KB, 756x1152px

>>33267118
>Rohm
2ugly

File: 1.png (327KB, 447x458px) Image search: [Google]

327KB, 447x458px

>mfw rollmarkfags out in full force with the damage control cause they can't accept they literally paid for some engraving
>mfw these people haven't even posted an ar

File: IMG_9045.jpg (2MB, 3024x3024px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x3024px

only rollmark that matters, anything else is just an imitation

>>33267116
It must be, I cannot comprehend how these sad fucks can honestly keep up the whole "Toyotas are not the same as the more expensive Mercedes" facade. I think it is just to justify their own purchases and make themselves feel better while temporarily filling a void with 'luxury' cars...

File: darkie hi res.png (3MB, 1194x3828px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 1194x3828px

>>33267130
Oh, my bad.

>>33267101
I may pick it up if I can convince some friends to buy it

>>33267114
Billet/ambi/etc are not the same as a basic forged, ya goober.

-Ascend Armory billet ambi lower
-Magpul UBR Gen 1
-Ergo Suregrip ambi
-Geissele Super 42 spring/H1 buffer
-Velocity 3# SS trigger group
-Ascend Armory ambi bolt catch
-Battle Steel ambi mag release
-V7 Weapons Ultralight Hybrid ambi safety
-Ascend Armory oversized receiver pins
-Ascend Armory anti-rotation pins
-Battle Arms Development mag button

-Ascend Armory billet upper
-V7 Weapons Ultralight dust cover
-V7 Weapons Ultralight FA
-AXTS Raptor CH
-AXTS nitride BCG
-Odin Works 16.1” 416R 8T ML .223 Wylde
-SLR Synergy Mini Comp Titanium
-Odin Works block
-Odin Works tube
-Odin Works O2 Lite 15.5” M-LOK handguard
-Magpul MBUS Pro Offset
-Magpul M-LOK rail covers

-Vortex Viper PST 1-4
-ADM ADR-X 3” offset QD mount

I'm on my backup phone and have no photos on here but I've posted this thing a bunch on /arg.

>>33267138
Should have got a PSA. It's literally the same thing

>>33267140
>if I can convince some friends to buy it
ya dont buy it alone

>>33267150
I know:(

File: 20160703_155747.jpg (2MB, 3264x1836px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x1836px

>>33267134
You have no idea what you are in for.

File: IMG_2428.jpg (710KB, 1224x1632px) Image search: [Google]

710KB, 1224x1632px

>his rollmark isnt rare
top kek

>>33267134
Nice Anderson

>>33267026
noice thanks anon.
>>33267029
then why can they charge 200 for a lower with now special shit like the razorback or jack? is the name that special in the industry?
>>33267044
but do those doubles affect the quality? or does it just look ugly?

File: Para FAL next to stock.jpg (1MB, 3258x1876px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3258x1876px

Still need a buffertube, preferably from someone who wants a pmag and sling mount

>>33267200
>giving you a buffer tube so you can bubba an fal
kys retard

>>33267200
I'll send you a buffer tube

File: 1486776231832.jpg (10KB, 251x201px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 251x201px

>>33267136
>implying there is a difference between lower receivers that equates to the quality difference between a Toyota and a Mercedes

Now you're just shitposting for the sake of shitposting

>>33267199
>is the name that special in the industry?
Yes

>>33267219
y tho? cause they make skull mag wells that will just make niggers know who to go after for dat monee?

File: Stg58 outside.jpg (3MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2448px

>>33267206
It's gonna go on this POS AR so I can get rid of the UBR, DSA adapter will come with a second tube

How is it bubba if I can change it back with the swap of a lower and the handguards?

>>33267207
Pics

File: 20160903_153625.jpg (1MB, 2689x1513px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2689x1513px

>>33267190
>his rollmark isn't prized
lmao@u

>>33267214
>implying a $100 bill is functionally better than a $1
>implying they aren't made all in one place
>implying they aren't made using the same process

>>33267190
>Gillette buffer
Should have gotten a PSA buffer ya fool.

Anyone know of a similar store that has parts kits you can customize? I was going to use red barn but they're out of stock.

File: 1467045249696.jpg (213KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

213KB, 800x450px

>>33267200
ACR it up

>>33267233
>Pics

Lol. Never mind.

>>33267199
>is the name that special in the industry?
It's just like it is with smartphones and computers. Companies like Apple and Samsung will put their name on a product and sell millions of units for twice the price of their competitors even though it's relatively the same thing.

>>33267247
speaking of. what's the point of buffer upgrades? anything?

>>33267235
its prized by aero fanboys

>>33267252
Not only is ACR disgusting the stocks are unobtanium and the adapters are secondhand only last time I checked

Someone on FAL Files is firing the project back up IIRC though

>>33267252
Why not just buy a SCAR?

File: 1486530109417.png (97KB, 692x444px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 692x444px

>>33267248
pls respond

>>33267263
I have one sitting around, never mounted.

>>33267235
>not vero beach
overpriced anderson

>>33267273
I have a fixed one I found in a pawn shop.

File: XL.jpg (321KB, 1024x576px) Image search: [Google]

321KB, 1024x576px

>>33267270
Why not just buy both?

>>33267271
No, I don't

>>33267255
so if I go buy a 50$ anderson lower from my local store and then get a spike's/colt symbol lasered onto them I could sell them for double the price? should I start doing this? would I make any real money? how drink am I to ask these questiond?

>>33267273
Still not doing an ACR FAL, I just don't like the look and I'd rather keep the built in iron sights, especially since I spent 70 dollars on an Argentine para sight already

SOPMOD + FAL looks sex and no one can tell me otherwise

Come on all you shit talkiing Anons, now's the time to post yer AR's that you speak so highly of when talking crap about everyone elses AR.

>>33267288
because poor fag

File: sad.jpg (810KB, 5696x4992px) Image search: [Google]

810KB, 5696x4992px

>>33267261
so fat losers who cant walk? got it.

>>33267281
>not vero beach
tfw

>>33267301
ebin!

>>33267291
>so if I go buy a 50$ anderson lower from my local store and then get a spike's/colt symbol lasered onto them I could sell them for double the price?
No but you could buy unmarked lowers and have them professionally engraved.

>how drink am I to ask these questiond?
I'd say you're pretty drink.

File: 20170309_154739(1).jpg (2MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1440px

this is my gun, we went for a shoot in the rain yesterday

>>33267294
>no one can tell me otherwise
it looks like shit

File: IMG_5777.jpg (113KB, 1680x640px) Image search: [Google]

113KB, 1680x640px

>>33267252
I'm loving the looks of this

>>33267312
that's what I'm saying, if I get them professionally engraved via machine could I sell "counterfiet" spike's lowers? or would people figure it out and come shoot me with semen .410 judges?

File: Para FAL SOPMOD.jpg (1MB, 3096x1695px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3096x1695px

>>33267315
CANNOT
TELL ME
OTHERWISE

>casv needs to hurry the fuck up tho

>>33267308
where should I buy my LPK
red barn is sold out

File: IMG_20160813_163336131.jpg (3MB, 3264x2359px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 3264x2359px

>>33267313
Shooting in the rain is pretty nice, it keeps the bugs away.

>>33267323
I think you'd have ATF issues depending on how many you bought and moved.

>>33267326
I thought you were going to "save" that poor stg?

>>33267322
What color is that?

File: 1464110323556.jpg (146KB, 640x640px) Image search: [Google]

146KB, 640x640px

>>33267298
Then dont get a SCAR, you really should spend at least $1500 on an optic for one.

>>33267346
baby shit brown

>>33267328
Literally anywhere. KYS while you're at it.

File: 1486530066761.jpg (38KB, 657x527px) Image search: [Google]

38KB, 657x527px

>>33267252
>>33267322

>>33267339
I still have the wood furniture set. I need to grab an Stg stock so I can have two fixed stock sets and the set that's on it right now

FAL lowers can be swapped like AR uppers, I just need my hammer arm and locking plate to come next week so both lowers are completely independent from each other

>>33267355
I don't need a grip or trigger included though

>>33267322
Just get a DPMS, they function the same. You're just wasting money on cosmetics.

File: ztzvpj.jpg (825KB, 1203x800px) Image search: [Google]

825KB, 1203x800px

>>33267359

>>33267373
so get one without it

>>33267374
not completely wrong

File: 20170309_154702.jpg (2MB, 2560x1440px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2560x1440px

>>33267333
it keeps the fairweather fudds away as well

>>33267381
I can't find one

>>33267380
gross

>>33267393
have you tried looking on google?

File: fef4fddb.jpg (348KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

348KB, 1024x768px

>>33267394

>>33267398
Of course I have

>>33267401
anon this is the /Aesthetic Rifle General/, I think you may be lost

>>33267401
If that had the extended top cover it wouldn't look too bad

>>33267380
Keymod is cancer

>>33267373
Slickguns. I've seen FCG and grip less kits here and there.

>>33267410
shit taste detected

>>33267406
look harder

If I want a barreled A2 Upper is Del Ton my best bet? I can't seem to find anywhere that even has non F marked FSP's so building my own upper seems kinda difficult.

Also, talk me out of finishing my 14.5" pinned midlength with an SLR Solo Ultralite 13.7" rail.

>>33267373
Google LPK without FCG

File: nfiq6v.jpg (230KB, 1600x1200px) Image search: [Google]

230KB, 1600x1200px

>>33267410
>>33267412

>>33267427
Nah, do it. I like what SLR has been doing and they need money given to them for it

>>33267430
acceptable

File: tumblr_nv8n8cNUqX1sw78zao1_1280.jpg (452KB, 1024x678px) Image search: [Google]

452KB, 1024x678px

>>33267451
Its full auto too

>>33267334
but I;m just a lowly merchwnt, tending my memes!
>>33267350
but I want one. if ayone would take my asshole for one let me know

>>33266632
So how bad was the actual shift with the Eotechs? I'm really wanting one. Is the defective just a meme generally or are they really shit?

>>33267481
Just get a dpms, they're just as good.

>>33267504
bad enough that they lost a lawsuit and bought back used ones at msrp

File: fdc2d1a921345eaac870f90c82d4b5eb.jpg (16KB, 480x345px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 480x345px

>>33267540

File: 516444973_4.jpg (8KB, 370x370px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 370x370px

I need opinions on this upper, but I have a note before you look. I don't have a lot of money to spend and probably wont for a couple of years, and I am trying to get an upper and lower assembly that is the best for the money, I dont want a $1000 rifle with no accessories or ammo, I want a $500-600 rifle.
http://palmettostatearmory.com/psa-ar15-16-mid-length-5-56-nato-1-7-nitride-13-5-m-lok-upper-with-bcg-ch-516444973.html

>>33267480
>it's full auto

No it's not

>>33267563
Figure out what you want and build. Otherwise you will end up like us with spare parts and less money

>>33267151
You guys are on PC right?

>>33267328
buy an aero lpk with no trigger and a larue mbt

>>33267562
It's all the same. You're just paying for an engraving and paint job.

>>33267584
thats why I am asking about the upper, whattaya think?

>>33267589
ya

>>33266742
Is that the lancer smoke clipazine?

File: images (32).jpg (16KB, 282x179px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 282x179px

>>33267597

File: 03032017.png (841KB, 813x394px) Image search: [Google]

841KB, 813x394px

>>33267504
It's not a meme. A shop I frequent hasn't sold a single EOtech in a year. Even normies know about it.

>>33267559
I ask because it seems like someone posted a source one time with testing that was done. I wanted to see how bad it was before I bought one. Just losing a lawsuit doesn't mean much to me.

File: bris.gif (3MB, 320x213px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 320x213px

>>33267620
whats your favorite episode?

>>33267563
It's a good beginner rifle and will last most likely for thousands of rounds

>>33267597
I would personally rather find a .223 wylde barrel from ballistic advantage or faxon, I would get a different muzzle device even though that one is fine. I would get a different rail.

>>33267639
I just want to know how much of a shift it was. I thought I saw someone post proof of it once

>>33267563
the elitists of /arg/ will shit on palmetto, but they're perfectly fine, mine's around 3k rounds and shoots MOA, same barrel as the one you posted i think

use the money you would have spent on fancy brand to get a nice trigger

>>33267651
The one where it finally ended.

File: image.jpg (118KB, 785x589px) Image search: [Google]

118KB, 785x589px

How much would it cost to get engraving on an 80% lower to get it to look like a C7A2? I'm in the process of making a clone and I need >a fucking leaf

File: images (40).jpg (7KB, 259x194px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 259x194px

>>33267651
I started rewatching from the beginning, and I'm just starting season 8. I don't think I can pick a favorite. They're consistently enjoyable

>>33267651
the episode when Kramer and Newman played Risk on the subway

>>33267680
Wow, I thought I was the only one that thought that PSA was good for the money. Yeah I think over the summer I'll buy this upper and one of their lower assemblies as well.

File: 20170206_230319.jpg (4MB, 4032x1497px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4032x1497px

>>33267610
Si

>>33267609
Bummer.

>>33267691
The final was a complete let down but if you read/watch the news at the time it was literally impossible to get approval from the fans.

>>33267714
I feel ya. I watch a few eps a night before I go to bed.

>>33267716
Ukraine is not weak!

>>33267697
the engraving wont cost a lot but having the anodizing stripped and redone is going to be more than the lower is worth

>>33267697
>a fucking leaf

Day of the rakes coming leaf

>>33267680
>shoots MOA

Bull fucking shit

>>33267747
Nice. She looks sexy. I have 10 of them coming this week. Are they reliable enough to use for defensive and SHTF situations or do you have backup full alloy magazines?

>>33267645
>Just losing a lawsuit doesn't mean much to me.
i'm lazy so i won't look for it but if you find the lawsuit and the settlement, it says exactly what the problems were.

>>33267322
What are you

>>33267735
If you do decide to spend more for some reason on the rifle, go for a better upper before a better lower

>>33267763
yep
with 55 gr wolf gold

>>33267777
lucky quads don't lie

File: 1458863336057.gif (891KB, 325x252px) Image search: [Google]

891KB, 325x252px

>>33267680
>and shoots MOA
>shoots MOA

>>33267777
No. It doesn't.

Important Information
Thermal Drift - After zeroing the ECOS systems at or near ambient temperature (73°F), the zero position will shift during operating temperature changes. The ECOS systems have the potential to shift approximately +/- 4 Minutes of Angle (MOA) at -40°F and 122°F. Due to thermal drift, the sight may not return to zero. The systems have the potential of approximately a +/- 2 MOA zero shift upon return to ambient (73°F) after being exposed to any temperature between -40°F and 122°F temperatures. Impact to the operators is the sight zero will be affected at varying operating temperatures.

File: memes.jpg (363KB, 1176x882px) Image search: [Google]

363KB, 1176x882px

>>33267676
It takes more time and effort to reply to my response than it it takes for you to google your question yourself. Quit being a helpless mouth-breather and sort your own shit out.

>>33267751
Is there a way around this? Would it have to be stripped if the engraving is done mechanically? Pardon my ignorance, by the way.

>>33267794
>>33267788
little bit under 1" group at 100 yards
believe it or not, i don't care

>>33267752
Trust me, I hate the Canuks too, but damn if their rifle isn't aesthetic as fuck

>>33267766
I keep my Lancers as HD mags over magpul or aluminum, but I'm not a soldier or cop, so my opinion on that kind of stuff isn't worth a lot. I've just never had malfunctions with the Lancer 30 rounders vs a handful with PMags and aluminum.

File: geissele-super-modular-rail-mk8-m-lok-black-smr-mk8-mlok-blk-by-geissele-2e3.jpg (24KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

24KB, 640x480px

guys

GUYS

Post Geissele guns! I'm thinking about getting an SMR mk8, but I want to see what looks best on a 16" barrel.

Right now I'm thinking 13. 15 may be a bit much, rail seems like a big guy.

>>33267800
I don't know, call US anodizing and ask on monday

>>33267806
You must be the absolute best marksman on here then.

File: 02282017full.jpg (621KB, 1896x844px) Image search: [Google]

621KB, 1896x844px

>>33267817
Mine's a 14.5" barrel with their 13" mk8

>>33267808
I'm a newbie here so I'm going to be asking some stupid questions. Why no forward grip? Most everyone else seems to have the handle or the half hook.

File: 1456192199576.png (192KB, 562x583px) Image search: [Google]

192KB, 562x583px

>>33267806
post build, and targets

>>33266632
I bought an Anderson lower. :)

File: 1438238412931.jpg (34KB, 480x360px) Image search: [Google]

34KB, 480x360px

>>33267826

File: 1487306454178.jpg (108KB, 960x960px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 960x960px

>>33267817
Get a 14.5" barrel. I wouldn't buy a rail that's longer than 13", anything longer is just extra weight and bulk.

>>33266847
>>33267817
10.5 w/ 9.5
16 w/ 13

File: 1460772079662.png (171KB, 374x347px) Image search: [Google]

171KB, 374x347px

>>33267826

>>33267867
>>33267879
what was it? I missed it

>>33267845
That proves nothing. He could shoot at targets from 5 feet away and claim 100yds.

>>33267860
nice

File: IMG_5778.jpg (54KB, 750x395px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 750x395px

>>33267770
Sexy innit? Remington R5 RGP

I just want to know what the color is because I'm pretty sure it's impossible to get ahold of.

>>33267879
>>33267882
>tfw I saved it, but won't post it because Fluffy wants to know what it was
blame Fluffy

File: 065.jpg (558KB, 1920x1280px) Image search: [Google]

558KB, 1920x1280px

>>33267882
dildo grip

>>33267900
oh

>>33267895
probably patriot brown

File: 1488432753222.png (158KB, 375x315px) Image search: [Google]

158KB, 375x315px

>>33267887
you can tell if it was that close

i just want something to back up his claims even slightly

>>33267888
No, you're supposed to flame me for it.

>>33267799
Lazy nigger

>>33267902
it was big

>>33267912
I will not

>>33267872
I have a 14.5, I'm thinking about selling it because dicking around with pinning just isn't worth it to me.

Still have 4 months left on a stamp, then I can go much shorter.

File: 1468800596972.png (1MB, 859x1221px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 859x1221px

>>33267916
>it was big
>7"
>big

uh oh anon....

>>33267919
:( okay...

File: IMG_5242.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>33267817
This is a mk4

File: bahhhhhhhhh.jpg (381KB, 900x1600px) Image search: [Google]

381KB, 900x1600px

should msd's old thread be the next one

>>33267953
no let it die a slow death

File: 1421.jpg (193KB, 900x1600px) Image search: [Google]

193KB, 900x1600px

>>33267953

>>33267921
What's the current wait time on an SBR stamp?

So I just picked up a dpms .308 sportical on the cheap. Now I'm looking for decent iron sights and a better buttstock. Can anyone point me in the right direction? I've never had anything on the at platform before

>>33267942
16" barrel w 15" rail

File: 20170310_231751.jpg (2MB, 1104x2722px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1104x2722px

>>33267836
Well, it's a newer build, so I haven't shot it more than a few hundred rounds. I haven't felt a need to put a grip on it yet. If I do, I'll get a stubby vertical grip. It's looking like I may just do rail covers, though.

File: 1460420048913.jpg (23KB, 245x294px) Image search: [Google]

23KB, 245x294px

>>33267967
dont tell me thats from the goat?

>>33267971
8mos

>>33267969
When I called the other day to get my pending date (I filed in September and didn't give a damn about calling, it's going to be long) the recording said 8 months

I believe people are getting stamps now who filed in May and June, so we haven't hit the real panic dump of paperwork from 41P

>>33267986
Doe

>>33267993
Fuck. I plan on submitting a form 1 on tuesday. Looks like I'll be waiting a minute for the return.

File: 123.jpg (591KB, 2056x1192px) Image search: [Google]

591KB, 2056x1192px

>>33267063
I keep seeing you post that AR in these threads, and I just want to say I like it a lot and saved one of your pictures.

>>33268018
File and forget. Don't even think about it, and whatever you do don't build an upper and slap it on a pistol lower, it will drive you mad.

>>33268024
Same pictures. Different thread. Every thread.

>>33267937
It was big for a dildo bro, 7" shouldn't penetrate you without some serious practice. Or so I'm told.

>>33268040
I already went through the once. I ordered a CMP service grade garands back in September. Finally got it a couple weeks ago.

>>33268042
Well it's a nice looking AR regardless.

File: 1436551025467.jpg (109KB, 1024x683px) Image search: [Google]

109KB, 1024x683px

>>33268042

>>33268054
Opinion disregarded.

>>33268042
>complains about pictures
>never posts his own AR

>>33267989
I don't understand

>>33267999
did you keep it

File: H19Ukcz.jpg (483KB, 2070x1380px) Image search: [Google]

483KB, 2070x1380px

>>33268024
ty kind anon

>>33268060
Not in Africa, nigger.

>>33268091
3spoopy

>>33268089
Pic came from a buddy.pretty sure it went into the gut bucket

>>33268110

new

>>33268071
>implying I own any guns

File: springfield saint.jpg (245KB, 2100x1583px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 2100x1583px

Any thoughts on the Saint?
If I buy an AR, I may buy this one. I owned a M1A Socom 16 before, and I loved it. I'd imagine that the Saint is a good quality AR.

>>33268180
>Any thoughts on the Saint?
don't

>>33268091
Hey, while you're here, could You actually give me a parts breakdown perhaps?

>>33268180
You could literally buy a high-quality stripped aero precision AR from brownells for less that $600 and just throw on a stock and Barrel-nut compatible quadrail, basically making your own, custom AR for the same price. It's what I'm going to do.

http://www.brownells.com/firearms/rifles/semi-auto/5-56mm-nato-oem-mid-length-16-rifle-sku100018335-81838-174289.aspx

I need a case for baby's first AR, any recommendations?