Does/should 922r apply to only vendors? Should it be done away

>>33062951
if you support 922r in any situation you are a gun grabber

File: great war of china.png (696KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

696KB, 1920x1080px

>>33062951
>shall

Not

>>33062951
>Does/should 922r apply to only vendors?
no.
>Should it be done away with all together?
yes.

Reminder that:

>Nobody has ever been caught for not being in 922r compliance.

>922r has a statute of limitations of 5 years so if you build something out of compliance and wait 5 years, you literally couldn't get in trouble for it.

>>33062951
We really don't need protectionism on the industry that builds cheap plastic bullshit to slap on AKs.

Do away with it, we have lots of genuine US made firearms industry that doesn't suck.

>>33062951
I have two AKs that I built that don't comply with 922r

922r does not apply to me at all

>>33062951
922(r) pls go
FUN FACT:
Did you know that 922(r) applies to domestically made guns? More accurately, it makes no distinction between foreign-made and domestically-made firearms. The receiver is simply one of twenty parts of which there may be no more than ten.
>>33063274
>922r has a statute of limitations of 5 years so if you build something out of compliance and wait 5 years, you literally couldn't get in trouble for it.
No, that's not what that means. That means that they have five years after it stops existing, not after it starts existing.