>Want to buy a beretta 9mm >not sure what to get M9, M9A1,

Do you want a rail? a1
No rail? classic aesthetics? m9

File: 92brigadierinox_zoom003.png (331KB, 840x543px) Image search: [Google]

331KB, 840x543px

>>32964680
Brigadier Inox!

>>32964680
inox m9 or brigadier...

>>32964680

I'll sell you an INOX 92FS (USA manufacture) for $500

If you're going for a rail, the 92A1 all day, but expect to lose some comfort between drawing and holstering.

If you want just a decocker instead of a safety, that's a version too.

>>32964680
96A1 and a 9mm barrel.
Now you have a .40S&W AND a 9mm

>>32964680
92F

File: 975281289204.jpg (99KB, 700x1183px) Image search: [Google]

99KB, 700x1183px

>>32965396

You can also get .357 Sig barrels, too.

>>32965896
>357 sig
or you could get a mortgage!

>>32964971
this get 92g

File: apx-pistol-facing-left_0.png (179KB, 1005x482px) Image search: [Google]

179KB, 1005x482px

Italian Glawk

File: m9 solid.jpg (76KB, 800x498px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 800x498px

>>32964680
A solid slide, if possible.

92f - doesn't have that upgrade that prevents the slide from shooting back.
>don't quote me on this, from what I've read it doesn't make a difference
92fs - same as above, but it has the upgrade. Note, the older one's have the straight dustcover, while the new ones have a ever so slight curve, that once you see, you can't unsee.

M9 - military designation for 92/92fs
M9a1 - 92fs w/ rail
M9a3 - 92fs with straight grips, rail, and tan color

File: tmp_12878-IMG_20170207_184442_435455481896.jpg (3MB, 5344x3006px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5344x3006px

>>32966728
Not possible and not helpful.
>>32964680
I love my 96 Vertec. I dropped a 9mm barrel and the G decocker parts into it and it has become my favorite pistol.

File: Wilson Combat Brigadier.jpg (248KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

248KB, 1024x768px

Gonna suggest 92A1, that gives you a rail.

Then perhaps buy a Brigadier slide, because it looks badass and lets the gun eat much hotter loads.

Or just skip all that and buy a Wilson Combat Brigadier, though they're not cheap.

Something I'll recommend heartily is to try out a MecGar 20 round magazine, high quality, high capacity, and it just barely protrudes from your grip.

File: Beretta 92G Vertec, 20rd MecGar magazine.jpg (131KB, 780x585px) Image search: [Google]

131KB, 780x585px

>>32966862
I wish they made a Vertec Brigadier.

>>32966863
Notice the 20rd magazine in this image.

File: tmp_12878-IMG_20170107_104359_313116734210.jpg (3MB, 5344x3006px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5344x3006px

>>32966863
>20 round Mec-Gar
I got you.

File: 911.jpg (410KB, 1731x1298px) Image search: [Google]

410KB, 1731x1298px

>>32964680
92s for classic looks

>>32966873
Elite 1A was just that. They are pretty rare, but do exist. Failing that, you can just keep an eye on eBay and GunBroker. Brig slides come up for sale pretty often.

>>32964680
M9A1

Whatever you end up going with, make sure you check it out in person first. The grip is pretty fat.

>>32966891
Finally someone with a good opinion and style

>>32966891

This option also allows you to get two for the same price as a modern one. That's one for each hand!

File: vomiting-goose.jpg (62KB, 484x461px) Image search: [Google]

62KB, 484x461px

>>32966911
>>32966891
>heel release

>>32964680


A1
>2 slot rail
>removable sights
>internal frame buffer
>made in itally

92 Brigadier
>beefier .05oz heavier slide
>removable sights

92
>no rail
>fixed front sight that can be drilled out to add a fiber optic or tritum dot. Few places will ctually mill out the front sight as there is very little material to work with

M9A1
>same sight issue as the 92
>chekered back strap
>single slot rail.

I went with a 92A1 for my EDC and home defense as I wanted a light on my gun and had to have night sights.

I bought a brig to make into the Samurai Edge from Resident Evil.

Paid $530 for the Brigadier shipped, no tax, no cosmetic wear...did I do good, bad, decent?

File: 1485779574239.jpg (63KB, 500x638px) Image search: [Google]

63KB, 500x638px

>>32964680
Why not in 10mm, OP?

>>32964680
What is your intended use?

Do you want night sights in the future?

Do you want a light/laser on it?

File: portman goes k.png (242KB, 268x400px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 268x400px

92fs

If you've got little babby hands like me, you'll love the m9a3 grips.

>>32967333
Good. Quite good.

File: memetytwo.jpg (2MB, 3840x2160px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3840x2160px

I only own pic related but for another purchase I'd opt for a 92 Brigadier (G model), because of its decocker-only lever.

I think I've decided on the M9A1. I like the bulky look of the pistol.

i am a nigger

File: untitled.jpg (44KB, 600x259px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 600x259px

>>32966998
>dual wield beretta 92s

File: Revy quickdraw.gif (857KB, 500x240px) Image search: [Google]

857KB, 500x240px

>>32964680
92FS

>>32968104
Revy carries the 92F...not FS

File: parade ass hanging out.gif (1019KB, 500x270px) Image search: [Google]

1019KB, 500x270px

>>32968121
http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Black_Lagoon#Custom_Beretta_92FS_Inox_aka_.22Praiyachat_Sword_Cutlass_Special.22

Where's the best place to get an excellent condition 92s at a good price. I'd fucking lose my shit if I paid a premium and it came in scuffed up

>>32966759
>M9A3
Also comes with a threaded barrel and the grips are slightly thinner, width wise, as well.

>>32966863
>fellow 92A1 owner here
Bro, the A1 already has a thicker frame and brigadier slide, that's half the reason why the original FS holsters don't fit (other than the rail)

>>32964680
FS if you just like the style of the original and the biggest aftermarket
M9A3 you want essentially the most modern evolution of the 92 series available (not just because of design date, but because of the features)
92A1 if you want a A3 in black and don't mind giving up the threaded barrel and Vertex (straight) frame and you want a brigadier slide and thicker frame

>>32968121
FS stands for fingerstepped, as in it doesn't have a rounded trigger guard.

File: 762.jpg (828KB, 2135x1601px) Image search: [Google]

828KB, 2135x1601px

>>32969555
>not wanting a scuffed up 92s
Jeez, its almost like you'd rather have some 17yo virgin than a used up 40yo whore

File: 92a1_zoom005.jpg (53KB, 606x600px) Image search: [Google]

53KB, 606x600px

>>32969950
The A1 does not come with a Brig slide standard.

File: Riggs_lethal_weapon.jpg (16KB, 300x210px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 300x210px

I want to look as much like this as possible, which version of the 92 do I buy?

>>32964680
Try and find a G type of 92. They're decocker only so you won't have to worry about engaging the safety when you rack the slide.

>>32970080
>just looked it up on Beretta's website
Shit, I guess you're right, I would like to see them side by side to see for sure though, that thing is thick and heavy as fuck.

File: Screenshot_2017-02-09-22-20-43.png (273KB, 540x960px) Image search: [Google]

273KB, 540x960px

>>32970063
I have two coming in tomorrow.

>>32970210
You can convert them yourself now they sell kits.

File: 1088.jpg (527KB, 1588x1191px) Image search: [Google]

527KB, 1588x1191px

>>32970944
Nice deal. I like mine.
One thing I noticed about these things is that the mags are nearly identitcal to my P226 mags

File: 1095.jpg (381KB, 1712x1284px) Image search: [Google]

381KB, 1712x1284px

>>32971161
With some minor dremel work, i think they could be interchangable

>>32964680
Surplus 92S because they're dirt cheap and accept modern mags (despite being old european style heel release). If you like the gun and end up buying mags for it, it'll still be compatible with others up to the M9A3 (which at the moment seems incredibly expensive for what it is).

Where can I get a Very Good or Excellent condition 92s?

>>32964680
There's no reason not to buy a Surplus 92S. They are a screaming deal and you'll probably be kicking yourself if you don't buy one.
>>32967185
Technically it's a push-button, it's just down by the heel.

>>32970276
The 92A1 slide is thicker.

File: 92brigadier_zoom001.png (352KB, 840x560px) Image search: [Google]

352KB, 840x560px

Bought a used brigadier last night for $525. Did I do good?

I'm building a samurai edge with it but I'm not going full weeb, gonna skip the engravings and just get an INOX barrel and checkered wooden grips with the beretta medallions in them.

File: 739.jpg (496KB, 1540x1155px) Image search: [Google]

496KB, 1540x1155px

>>32971398
wait for a best of 5 option from one of the places that sells the surplus imports.
Or just but 5 of them from jgsales roght now, keep the nicest one and sell the other 4.

>>32972167
The more i use the heel release on my 92s the more i start to like it.

>>32964680
M9a3 when it is available

>>32970192
http://www.imfdb.org/wiki/Lethal_Weapon_%281987%29#Beretta_92F

Also the same gun used in Die Hard, so you'd have twice the cool.

Beretta 90 two
M9A3 if it comes in black

>>32970210
>so you won't have to worry about engaging the safety when you rack the slide
Have you ever done this unintentionally? The safety isn't sitting there loose, you can even use the safety for grip when racking the slide.

>>32972943
fucking wrong, don't post about shit you have no experience with. anybody can test this, go to your LGS and tap n' rack a fucking a berette. man, your safety WILL be engaged

File: 1463633971973.jpg (2MB, 2958x2000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2958x2000px

>>32972440
That's pretty good.

Someone here on /k/ actually went all the way and had a faithful replica made, a 92FS, Brigadier slide with the proper engravings and forward serrations, the grips with the medallion, the polished stainless barrel, the works.

>>32972967
>your safety WILL be engaged
Mouthbreather detected.

>>32970944
>$249.95
Is this a good website? I was about to drop 500$ on one off armslist

>>32972980
Do airshit grips work on real guns? I thought the guy used them instead of custom wood grips, but maybe that was someone else.

>>32972987
yes, if you tap n' rack a non G-type 92 your hand will fucking engage the safety, it's not probably, it's not maybe, its fucking 99.99% going to happen. do you own a 92? are you a faggot?

>>32973005
Often, like 1911 grips will usually fit.

>>32964680
Is there anywhere to get surplus m9s?

>>32973005
>>32972980
There's actually a site owned by a guy who specializes in making the SE grips. He even made them for the new movie I think. The site is DS Grips.

>>32973007
Never happened to me, you must just be clumsy or have gorilla hands.

>>32973025
I wouldn't bet on them showing.
Either way, a lot of them are in a sorry condition (hence the replacement), so they really wouldn't be nice guns by that point.

>>32973000
Witnessed. Yes, I've been to the store in person, a big warehouse full of guns.

>>32973049
you didn't answer my fucking question did you faggot nigger. fucking day/k/are xboxlive niggers

File: beretta.jpg (289KB, 1632x918px) Image search: [Google]

289KB, 1632x918px

>>32966873

they do, it's called an elite IA.

>>32966892

oh hey, look at that.

>>32973077
I don't need to answer shit, mental lightweight, only a fucking mouth breather would accidentally engage a slide safety.

>>32973049
That sucks. I want a cheap surplus with a lot of cosmetic wear, just for the fun of it.

>>32964680
Just a plain old Beretta M9. I would opt for the M9 because it retains the original 92 aesthetics (.40 frame is pig disgusting) and lacks the Ruger-tier WARNINGS on the slide/frame. M9A1/3 if you insist on a rail.
Or look for older 92's from the late 80s and early 90s like an SB or 92f or fs. They are fairly common and are fun to hunt for, just like finding an older Smith & Wesson.
>>32973007
I own 3 and it has never happened to me in 7 years of owning and frequently shooting
92 series pistols. Keep saying "nigger" and "faggot" more while accusing people of being autistic, it really makes you sound like a grown man.

>>32973119
Look at a 92S from Europe then, they're pretty cheap and some are fairly beat up.

Or you could buy a new 92FS and go to town on it with leather, sandpaper, etc.

>>32973127
Not that guy, is a 92S a good buy for first pistol? Have only fired a 92FS before and I liked it, but poorfag

>>32972920
Pretty much want one just to fuck with while watching Die Hard and Lethal Weapon so sold. I want the 92s because the cosmetic differences are zilch and the price is so damn good but I'll keep an eye out for any 92f models

>>32973141
>Is <blank> a good buy for a first <blank>?
The answer is almost always yes. Just buy what you like and learn about it as you go. Maybe you'll end up liking it and buying more/variations of the same gun. Maybe you won't, but you'll learn what to look for next and you can resell it.

Just get whatever you're into, dude.

File: brain_problems.jpg (31KB, 192x220px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 192x220px

>>32973144
>URRRR HOW I GRAB SLIDE? NIGGERNIGGERNIGGER

>>32973141
Yeah they're quite alright pistols, be mindful of the fact that the magazine release is in the wrong place.

Optionally you could look at a used Taurus PT92, but the thing is that you'll have to replace the shitty factory magazines to get it to work well so that will eat into your funds in itself.

You could always just try to save up for a used 92FS, you see them for below 500 at times.

>>32973181
this fucking noguns right here though

>>32973005
Yes
Source: I bought an airshit 92a1 off of a guy when I was 17 and before he gave it to me he traded the grips he had put on it with stock grips that he had put on his 92FS for time being.

>>32973000

JG is ok. I bought my .22 Beretta from them earlier in the year.

File: Csgo_2013-12-18_02-02-53-476.jpg (1MB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1920x1080px

>>32968091
We CSGO now

>>32973141
92s is fine.
l like the heel mag release. Push the button and the empty mag falls right into the palm of my hand. Works good for mag retention battery of arms.
The standard us version button placement actually requires me to change my grip on the pistol to release the mag. Essentially givng up a certain level of control and readiness.
The heel release doesn't require changing your grip on the pistol so you always have maximum positive control and readiness of you weapon

File: 20161210_014441[1].jpg (732KB, 2016x1512px) Image search: [Google]

732KB, 2016x1512px

>>32973848
Heel release is superior

>>32973978
If you're a European from 80+ years ago.

>>32974296

I can pretend

>>32974296
>40+
FTFY

>>32964680
>get trump to dump all the US army berettas as surplus for cheap
>prices for all berettas drop
>???
>get them all

File: Muh gun.jpg (627KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

627KB, 1500x1000px

>>32972980
Oh no no no, please delete that picture. That's back when I still had the Brig frame. Have a new one!

>>32975310

The engraving on the slide ruins it for me, but damn that thing is sexy.

File: SE mid shot.png (399KB, 640x320px) Image search: [Google]

399KB, 640x320px

>>32975534
Thanks.

File: 1485157704735.jpg (129KB, 452x680px) Image search: [Google]

129KB, 452x680px

92fs

>>32973848
>Push the button and the empty mag falls right into the palm of my hand.
You can do that with the trigger guard release.

> Essentially givng up a certain level of control and readiness.
You're changing a mag. Chances are that you're probably already empty anyway. Doesn't really matter how ready you are when the gun has no bullets in it. I mean, I guess you make the case of betting your life on the one round left in battery during a tactical reload.

The reasons why Beretta relocated the mag release is because 1) The release can switch sides for lefty shooters 2) The off hand can already be reaching for a fresh magazine while the shooting hand is dropping the empty/old one on the ground for faster magazine exchanges. With the heel release you can't do that simultaneously since the off hand has to hit the release first and then reach for the mag as two sequential steps.

The only legitimate reason to go with a heel release is shooter's preference where the guard release is obtrusive to the shooter's grip and the heel release feels more comfy.

>>32972440
>Did I do good?
Pretty good. Brigs are generally desirable and asking prices are usually >$600 for a decent used one because MUH DURABILITY.

Personally I'd skip on medallion grips for the ones with the insignia etched into the wood, but that's just me.

>>32976815
I always felt that WW2 vets were probably some of the first American weebs.

>>32975310
What's the difference?

Also I think the Samurai Edge had adjustable target sights if I recall right.

File: LE Use Only.jpg (792KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

792KB, 1500x1000px

>>32979505
The dust cover is the difference. The 92F frame has the straight dust cover without the "read manual before use" on the right side. The 92FS cover is slanted with the manual shit.

And the sights on the Samurai Edge are slightly different, but they don't exist outside the game or airsoft replicas. The RPD requirements for the gun stated that it needed dotted post sights, so that's what I have.

File: IMG_4521.jpg (2MB, 3265x2449px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3265x2449px

>>32964680
Can't go wrong with a 92fs OP.
I'd like to get an inox one day.

>>32979545
not all 92FS have that retarded read manual stuff and slanted dust cover, see >>32967655

Just bought a 92s, where is the notch on the magazine I should be looking for when I buy more? Lower back?

File: 20170204_215211.jpg (3MB, 4160x2340px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 4160x2340px

>>32972967
This is not true at all post your 92fs fag

File: tmp_2380-IMG_20170213_124421-841046234.jpg (2MB, 2327x3006px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2327x3006px

>>32980500
There you go.

>>32972967
Look at this dumb asshole.

File: Beretta92sb.jpg (663KB, 2000x1333px) Image search: [Google]

663KB, 2000x1333px

>>32964680
>>32966891
SB for classic looks and a better mag release

File: 1465787719314.jpg (55KB, 640x572px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 640x572px

>>32973007
fat fuck sausage fingers decteted

>>32981296
This^

I "tap n rack" my m9 for pistol qual all the time, this faggot doesn't know how to handle a weapon.

>>32973007
I can literally use the safety as cocking wings and that shit can't happen.

You're a retard.

You're parents are retards.

Their parents are retards.

You shouldn't have been born.

Kill yourself.

>>32973007
Just wanted to join in with everyone else letting you know you're retarded and wrong.

I've shot a 92FS for over 10 years and have never once accidentally engaged the safety. I have a PX4 which has a slide mounted safety and have never accidentally engaged that. Some people actually switch their PX4 safety levers to 92 styles. Why would they do that if there was some massive 99.99% of the time error that came with the levers?

I also have an M9A3 and have never accidentally engaged the safety, but if you're a scared child about, the M9A3 has the safety levers canted upwards to help prevent this fantasy problem you babies on the internet invented because Colion Noir said the safety hampered his "power stroke"

>>32966728
The open slide is very intentional. It is a feature, not a flaw.

>>32966891
Given how easy it is to track down a 92fs for sub $500 in the used market I have a hard time being sold on the 92s.

File: image.jpg (1MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 3264x2448px

>>32964680
Join the club anon! Berettafags have some of the most sleek sense of style you will see on this board. Beware the CZfags, they are nothing but barbarians and simpletons.

>>32980850
Is that notch not supposed to be there? What's wrong with it?

>>32982048

It's present on some. It's only important if you need mags compatible with the 92s or another heel style release.

The upper notch is for the new mag release, so this one doesn't matter either way for a newer gun.

>>32982064
Thanks anon

File: 20170213_145406.jpg (1MB, 2048x1536px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2048x1536px

>Beretta Thread
Can I join?

>>32982086
Of course.

>>32965896
>I want my gun to shoot cancer

>>32982086
How do you like the px4? Do you cc it? How many rounds threw it? Malfunctions?

>>32982110
>How do you like the px4?
I love it. It's my go-to 9mm.
>Do you cc it?
Yup. The only time I don't is if my clothes are too tight.
>How many rounds threw it?
I don't know anyone named "Round" throwing my guns.
2300
>Malfunctions?
None. It eats everything I throw into it. Trash steel, match brass, even memetastic polymer case the one time I had a mags worth.

>>32964680
92A1, 92G-SD, 92 Brigadier, M9A3, Wilson Combat Brig Tactical. All others are just inferior versions. Pick how much you wanna spend and buy one.

>>32964680
The M9A1 is the coolest IMO.

>>32980500
Buy MecGar 18rd mags instead. They just as well as factory mags because Beretta, Sig, CZ, & others contract them to make their factory mags. If you wanna spend $15-$20 more for a PVD coating and 1-3 less rounds go ahead.

>>32982209
I'm pretty sure MecGar makes all of Beretta's mags today.

>>32982209
The guy needs mags compatible with the retro 92s. Modern Mec-Gar mags lack the correct notch to interface with the 92s heel mag catch circled here >>32980850.
I do not know if modern Mec-Gars could be cut to accommodate the old latch, as the spring in the new magazines sits directly against the sides of the mag body.

>>32982579
Good point. Missed that.

File: IMG_20170213_155112.jpg (200KB, 1280x960px) Image search: [Google]

200KB, 1280x960px

$250 good grade from J&G.

File: CAM00365.jpg (921KB, 1944x2592px) Image search: [Google]

921KB, 1944x2592px

>>32984196
Barrel.

>>32984213
>>32984196
That's pretty good for a 9mm pistol with 15rds standard mags.

File: IMG_0131.jpg (56KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 640x480px

>>32984196
>tfw I paid under 400 for my 92A1 brand new

>>32964680
m9 replica is the only choice

>>32984502
what did he mean by this

OP Here

>http://www.southernpoliceequipment.com/shop/default.asp?h=b&b=91&id=2461

Should I....

>>32984898
alternatively
>http://www.jgsales.com/beretta-92s-semi-auto-pistol,-9mm,-4.9-barrel,-early-italian-s-model,-black,-good,-used.-p-93312.html

>>32964680
Vertec

File: BioGun.jpg (41KB, 582x436px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 582x436px

I want to get a fairly close copy of the Resident Evil pistol, what Beretta do I get to be close?

>>32985861
The closest you can probably get off a stock Beretta 92 would be the Brigadier Elite.

Basically you're looking for a Beretta without a rail, with a straight dust cover, and a brigadier slide. The Elite also has the front serrations.

File: tmp_20258-IMG_20161219_201749374-1301099017.jpg (3MB, 5344x3006px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5344x3006px

>>32984898
For actual use as a defensive weapon.
>>32984937
For cost effective range toy.
>>32985130
A good choice. My personal favorite.

>>32981565

Meh, hating the 92 is a past time for a gunnitors and /k/ommandos. You can't post a thread on the 92 without haters coming and vomiting their YT knowledge.

>>32979545
>"LAW ENFORCEMENT USE ONLY"

Some how this is worse tan the normal "Read manual" one.

I am hoping that the military starts selling off surplus m9s. Yea they'll be worn out but they'd be cheap enough that they would be good for gunsmithing projects. I would love to get a surplus m9 and a bunch of wilson parts.

>>32970960
Holy ducks ticks, I didn't know they sold kits. I bought the WC low profile safety so maybe my next 92/m9 will get the conversion

>>32971398
Southern Ohio Gun, pay to play

File: P320-compact[1].jpg (772KB, 1200x754px) Image search: [Google]

772KB, 1200x754px

Why not get the army's newest pistol instead? The P320 is super accurate and highly modular.

>>32989964
The 320 is nice and all, but some people prefer metal frames, or hammer fired guns, or any number of other reasons.

>>32989840
If the military does end up selling the surplus M9, you'd probably only have to change the guide spring to get it working good as new. Maybe change the locking block for good measure or just get a new barrel assembly.

>>32989964
The military P320 design hasn't been finalized yet. If you want a "true" military Sig, it's better to wait and see what kind of turd falls out of the gubbmint's ass this time around.

File: 975281289204.jpg (6KB, 282x179px) Image search: [Google]

6KB, 282x179px

I wish Beretta offered a more subdued gray finish that's not a bright as the Inox, but more character than the standard Bruniton black. Black is boring and Inox looks too much like you work for the Cartels.

>>32984213
>>32984196
Rifling looks like the gun was barely shot at all, but the slide still has sexy wear on the finish.

For $250, that's not bad at all.

>>32989964
For some reason the aesthetics (or lack thereof) on the p320 just disgusts me. I know it's a good pistol and works fine, but I could never own one simply because I can't stand to look at it.

>>32990516
You could get some cerecoat done if that is your thing, or just get a Bruniton one and wait for the holster wear to come in. I have a Bruniton Vertec and just swapped in some Inox parts to give it some character.

File: 975281289204.jpg (120KB, 800x726px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 800x726px

>>32972967
>tap n' rack a fucking a berette. man, your safety WILL be engaged

You're either clumsy, fat, or both.

>>32990516
Cerakote it tungsten gray.

File: 1485615173711.jpg (25KB, 400x373px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 400x373px

>>32972967
nah, you just suck.

>>32981122
>rounded fud trigger guard
no thanks. if i wanted sperg aesthetics and shit functionality i'd get a smith and wesson.

File: 1485346306633.jpg (27KB, 708x588px) Image search: [Google]

27KB, 708x588px

>>32989964
sp2022 is better. double strike capability. sexier. etc.

File: 5906.jpg~original.jpg (104KB, 1022x337px) Image search: [Google]

104KB, 1022x337px

>>32991648
Nothing wrong with a Smith & Wesson

>>32992189
besides the ROUND TRIGGER GUARD. seriously if it weren't for european designs i wouldn't be into guns at all. burger blasters are retarded looking.

File: S&W 5906, Polished Stainless, Wood Grips, Squared Trigger Guard.jpg (60KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

60KB, 1024x768px

>>32992213
Have a squared off triggerguard then.

File: 20170101_072146.jpg (4MB, 4032x3024px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 4032x3024px

You like M-9s? Maybe it's because I carry one at work, but I think they're boring.

>>32993371
I mean people like glocks...

>>32993371
You're a fool, squid.

File: IMG_20170213_192403.jpg (1MB, 2500x1875px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2500x1875px

>>32964680
M9A3 is comfy.

>>32993418
I mean that's more about muh reliability and muh mud test. I guess Beretta is kinda a rap meme. If I'm spending $700-1k on a 9mm I want something different than Jamal.

File: 1487094114187.gif (1MB, 257x200px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 257x200px

>>32993482
>rap meme

>>32993482
>rap meme
>service pistol since 1985

>>32993516
AKs are a huge rap meme too and they've been used since like 1946.

>>32993531
So are Glocks then, you dumb faggot.

Kill yourself.

>>32993535
Never said Glockenspiels weren't fag tard. But at least they aren't boring guns.

File: IMG_20170213_193344.jpg (1MB, 2500x1875px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2500x1875px

No one loves the 90two

But they should.

>>32993531
>ak's are a huge rap meme
The ak reliability is what is a meme. If your not throwing your rifle in mud puddles and dragging it through sand or otherwise fucking it up intentionally it's a perfectly fine platform and there is a reason it's so fucking popular.

A 9mm is just going to bounce off someone with a winter coat, you should get at least a .40

>>32970944
I see somebody else from /k/ was also in that /pol/ thread about guns.

>>32982086
No, we don't like guns around here boy!

>>32993516
>ganster rap started in the 80s
>they only like guns cuz dey cool.
>cant blame em.

>>32993557
>>32993572
I forgot that the 90two even existed. How is it? How big is it compared to say, a 92FS or a PX4?

File: Beretta92FS_2ToneType01.jpg (153KB, 700x455px) Image search: [Google]

153KB, 700x455px

>>32993482
Nignogs like Mossberg shotguns too, that doesn't invalidate the 590A1.

The 92 is an excellent pistol.

>>32993556
>Glock slide is a completely squared rectangular box
>this is somehow more interesting looking than an open topped slide with a rounded top, featuring various scallops and bevels, an external ejector, ambidextrous safety and a hammer

>>32993715
Pretty much the same.

>>32993609
Ill just leave this here trollanon

http://concealedcarryholsters.org/wp-content/files/FBI-Analysis-on-PA-Police-Shootout.pdf

>>32993715
The size of the gun itself is pretty much the same. The grip is slightly smaller than a standard 92.

File: E4.jpg (197KB, 640x480px) Image search: [Google]

197KB, 640x480px

>>32993715
It's basically a just weird looking 90-series pistol. Feels and shoots just the same. The reason why it looked so different is because it was "ergonomically enhanced" to be less likely to snag on a holster as well as few adjustments for comfort. A lot of the features that first showed up on the 90-Two would be later used on the -A1 models (captive spring/rod assembly, slide buffer, dovetail sights, and pic rail) and the M9A3 (swappable grip sizes, checkered front and back straps, canted safety lever).

>>32993572
>>32993970
It is nice to see some 90-two action around here. It is an underappreciated member of the family.

>>32990516
that's just what happens when you buy an Italian gun.
Count yourself lucky it doesn't come with Virgin Mary grips

>>32995178
I think it's because calling it the "90-Two" was a bit confusing from a marketing standpoint. Word of mouth matters a lot and if you say "Beretta Ninety-Two" what people think is the normal Beretta 92.

Instead of making a product that would literally be known as the "Beretta Ninety-Two", they should have gone with "902" for "Beretta Nine-Oh-Two" or perhaps "920" for "Beretta Nine-Twenty".

In fact, I vote that we call it the "Nine-Oh-Two" verbally to help distinguish it from the regular pistol from now on.

>>32995471
Honestly Beretta must have a bunch of retards running their marketing department. In "Glock" they talk about how a PD asking Beretta about buying the 92 as their service pistol would have a marketing guy drop off a beat up 92fs with 1 mag. When they called Glock they got 3 or 4 new Glocks right out of the box with several mags and where aloud to keep the Glocks even if they didn't buy a contract.

Beretta really shoots them self in the foot with marketing sometimes. Just look at the difference in the facebook pages of Glock vs Beretta.

https://books.google.com/books/about/Glock.html?id=RIkXLYOZJf8C&printsec=frontcover&source=kp_read_button&hl=en#v=onepage&q&f=false

File: dssr.png (2MB, 799x1000px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 799x1000px

>>32992189
smith just needs some fine tuning

File: dazzle pensive.png (266KB, 667x429px) Image search: [Google]

266KB, 667x429px

>>32995471
The conception of the name is meant to illustrate that it was a second "generation" of the 90-series of pistols with all the upgrades it has gotten in a single iteration and sort of relaunch the model. In Beretta circles, it goes by a few names when verbalized which include "Ninety-dash-two" and "Tee-double-u-oh" among other.

As for why that particular model never took off, it's several reasons. Chief among those reasons is that every LEO that wanted a Beretta already had them the mid-2000s when the 90-Two was released. Also there were people who thought that the frame was made of polymer instead of metal because the plastic grip and rail cover covered up most of the frame. Also, the redesign looks pretty funky and may have been a turn-off for some people. It's probably what drove Beretta to just apply the upgrades of the 90-Two and adapt them into the more traditionally styled pistol which lead to the creation of the A1 models (although dropping a few features in the process).

>>32993739
>that last pic of the guy's tattoos
top kek

File: 1458580423100.jpg (70KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

70KB, 1280x720px

>>32993739
Oh holy shit you've gotta be kidding me.

The last slide is right, shot placement is most important, even using an AR or whatever. I mean, I don't like .40 for various reasons, but it wasn't at fault there. Fuck's sake that guy took it like a Terminator.

>Reloaded magazine from box of loose ammunition
FUCKING HOW

WHAT THE FUCK WERE THOSE COPS DOING

File: 975281289204.jpg (117KB, 900x596px) Image search: [Google]

117KB, 900x596px

>>32995409
>Count yourself lucky it doesn't come with Virgin Mary grips

Well, if you're looking like you run backup enforcement for the Sinaloa, may as well go full llamativo with it.

>>32995953
"That which does not kill you makes you stronger"

Hmm. So, did this guy get stuck in a .40 feedback loop?

File: pix512303664.jpg (76KB, 640x374px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 640x374px

Fucking tempting.

http://www.gunbroker.com/item/621636531

>>32964680
>Want to buy a beretta 9mm
It'll be a good range toy but if you plan on actually using it then I recommend you get a 1911 instead. Nothing beats that 45 stopping power.

>>32996913
Might as well just a get 92S if you're looking to save a few bucks.

>>32995562
I know there's flush fitting 17 rounders from Spaghettiland, but how many does that extendo hold?

>>32996935
I have a 92fs and 92g I just thought the shortened barrel but normal frame was neat.

>muh mag interchangeability
>muh shorter barrel for lighter and concealabler

>>32996913
>>32996961
Centurions are hotness. Do it.

File: 716005998_2.jpg (120KB, 1000x729px) Image search: [Google]

120KB, 1000x729px

>>32996997
The question would be if I could find holsters that take advantage of the shortened barrel.

>>32996915
good meme. but if you want a man's gun, skip 40/9/45 and get 10mm.

>>32997031
Maybe not off the shelf, but custom kydex makers are everywhere.

>Or just cut down a holster

File: Kahr-Quickslide-Black-Front__82261.1470667372.1280.1280.jpg (31KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

31KB, 500x500px

>>32997090
What about this nonsense?

Actually a usable holster or pretty fucking good way to not have relatively safe retention of a firearm?

http://www.versacarry.com/qs-sizes/versacarry-quick-slide-series-ambidextrous-size-1/

File: E01115_FRONT1.jpg (44KB, 650x650px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 650x650px

>>32997090
Actually......

http://www.berettausa.com/en-us/ra-holster-s-92-rh-blk-blk-lthr/e01115/

>>32977906
holy shit....

Beretta ergonomics suck a lot of cock.

I've never met a soldier/sailor/marine that came home and explicitly looked for an M9 to carry or even plink with.

The slide looks dead sexy, I'll give you that.

File: Beretta 96 'Brigadier' Elite II .40S&W.jpg (487KB, 900x600px) Image search: [Google]

487KB, 900x600px

>>32996915
>get Beretta 96A1
>put a Brigadier slide on it
>buy some nice .40S&W brass
>buy the heaviest .40cal ball that can fit in a magazine/chamber, alternatively, some nice Lehigh XP
>load the stuff real hot

I'd say you got an alright little powerhouse, even if it's maybe a bit shy of 10mm Auto

You could also look for an Elite II, but they're kind of uncommon and don't have a rail like an A1

>>32997272
>babbyhands
>putting weight into the opinions of professional welfare queens who use a handgun on odd occasions

>>32964680
You fucking dolt. Just buy a 92S on J&G sales for $250.
Literally that easy.

>>32997272
Marine here.

Came home and bought two Beretta 92's.

>>32997116
I have never used one like that.
>>32997132
Looks promising
>>32997272
Beretta ergos can be difficult if you are trying to use a 1911 manual of arms. This can be readily solved by using the weapon correctly.

Army 68w here, since you mentioned people in the service.

>>32997039

>> man's gun
>> 10mm

Psh, nothin personel kiddo

> transmutes pathetic weak plastic

Try out a real mans gun

> It's a smith and Wesson 460xvr !!

Super effective...

>>32997330
>Marine here.

>Came home and bought two Beretta 92's.

Jarheads gonna jar

>>32984357
>not blued
>straight dust cover
>no you didn't

>>32997324
>heel release

>>32996941
three zero chap

the 17s are not flush

13 is flush
15 is bump
17 sticks out 5mm

File: MecGar 17rd 5906 magazine.png (76KB, 167x370px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 167x370px

>>32998531
I'm almost positive the 17rd magazine should sit flush on the 5900 pistols, they look identical to the original 14rd mags

File: IMG_0733.jpg (42KB, 480x466px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 480x466px

>>32981524
This shit gets so personal.

File: 92fcutlass.gif (470KB, 424x240px) Image search: [Google]

470KB, 424x240px

>>32968121
>>32968386

File: lt castillo.jpg (59KB, 320x238px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 320x238px

>>32997039
>good meme.
>get 10mm.

>>32964680
you dont want a beretta

>>32999231
yeah thats not going to be flush in a daewoo

>>33000742
not a meme. learn your specs before you open your retarded mouth.

>>33000801
get 9x25 to be a real boy

File: picSkeletonChair.jpg (12KB, 230x230px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 230x230px

>>33000738
>>32968386
>>32968104

I'm still waiting for volume 11 btw. Surely Hiroe will deliver soon. Right?

Being a Black Lagoon is painful *sigh*

>>33000849

*Being a Black Lagoon fan

>>33000801
I'm not questioning the power of the 10mm. Just pointing out that very few guns are offered in 10mm, of those, few are reasonably affordable. Ammo is also expensive and the full-power stuff is harder to find in your LGS/sporting goods department. And you really have to buy the full-power rounds to make buying a 10mm gun worth while, otherwise you're just throwing away money on the generic brands with glorified .40 performance.

It's been over 30 years and the 10mm never really took off. Only being perpetuated by a small enthusiast community and in LEOs sporadically which is precisely what makes it a meme round.

>>33000801
And here is the point where enthusiast becomes fanboy. If you want people to agree with your purchasing decisions because you need that affirmation, try not being a prick about it.

10mm is fine for Alaska carry, but not everyone is worried about moose attacks. Any one of the big 3 is a fine person killer, and so are many other less common rounds like .41 AE, .45 GAP, and .357 SIG.

>We all know that .40 kills moose

File: sonny and rico.jpg (48KB, 640x430px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 640x430px

>>32993482
>I guess Beretta is kinda a rap meme.

What did he mean by this?

File: Beretta-92-chart01.jpg (2MB, 1000x3101px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 1000x3101px

take a look at this

>>32982110
>>32982148
Not the original Px4 poster but I have one too. It is super smooth and carries well. Very ergonomic and has rounded edges.

The only failure I had was with the first mag. It stovepiped 2 rounds. I quickly broke it down and gave it some lube. No problems since, probably close to 3k rounds.

File: 1472434630813.gif (227KB, 600x600px) Image search: [Google]

227KB, 600x600px

>>32973007
>>32972967
Have you tried getting laid?

File: 1473379917525.jpg (456KB, 1000x562px) Image search: [Google]

456KB, 1000x562px

Ca.. can I join in....?

>>33005121
no fuck off

File: 1469453562902.jpg (72KB, 1174x738px) Image search: [Google]

72KB, 1174x738px

>>32973007
I think there is a reason you engage it.
Some people souldn't have guns

File: 14872000394121614810733.jpg (601KB, 2592x1456px) Image search: [Google]

601KB, 2592x1456px

Bumping with my 92s that just arrived. Hardly any external wear besides a bit of finish on the grip and a dirty barrel.

>>33006439
Looks nice. Gratz.

>>32997272
Bullshit. All the m9/92fs owners I know are military or former military.

>>32997272
>I've never met a soldier/sailor/marine that came home and explicitly looked for an M9 to carry or even plink with.
Because most of 'em were forced to work with 30 year old beat to hell franken guns assembled from the parts of five other guns.

File: worn-out-beretta-large.jpg (238KB, 800x412px) Image search: [Google]

238KB, 800x412px

>>33005121
Dad? Is it really you? It has been so long.

You know that I am retiring now. It feels strange, but then I am sure you understand. Looking back, were you proud? I know that you worked hard, no matter what was asked of you. I respect that.

What do you do when the work is over? Will anyone still need me?

>>32997274
>willing putting that much cash into a .40

>>32984357
sure, because dealers love taking a $175+ hit on a firearm.

>>32989964
>needing modularity on a pistol

File: my fetish.png (191KB, 600x638px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 600x638px

>>33007065
>dat 30 years of wear on the finish

Get some wood grips on that bad boy and it will look sexy as fuck.

>>33000743

And why don't I want one?

>>33000862
>>33000849
I hear he's finally going to continue the manga soon.

>>33005121
The P38 and P1/P4 are aesthetic.

The grip is pretty fat though, so if someone would make a new version of it that took Beretta 92 magazines (which would easily fit in that space), as well as maybe give the slide a Brigadier style cut, that would make for an incredibly sweet target pistol I think.

I mean the big appeal of old single-stack 9mm pistols is that they're slim, and the P38 kind of isn't. Still a great pistol for it's time though, easily on par with the 1911 and TT33.

>>33007146
Sure, I love weird projects and customs like that.

>All this 9mm

I had no idea there was so many women on /k/

Taurus versions have frame safety, as god intended.

what are some neet places to get custom grips?

>>33008168
DSGrips.com

>>33006645

Anonymous 02/15/17(Wed)18:27:30 No.33006645
>>32997272 #
Bullshit. All the m9/92fs owners I know are military or former military.

Well, I don't know how to explain it. Could be my age bracket. 34-38 average

I volunteer for a veteran advocacy. Getting recently separated service men hooked up with education, job training, and social groups.

When we shoot, I see a lot of Glock, Sig, and HK.
If I mention M9 92fs etc, I get a lot of groans.

Almost zero revolvers and only occasionally CZ

>>33008751
>When we shoot, I see a lot of Glock, Sig, and HK.
>If I mention M9 92fs etc, I get a lot of groans.

That's because vets generally have shit taste and follow whatever the current trend is when they get out. Besides, most enlisted men won't have much experience with the M9. Only officers and medical personnel get them issued nowadays. I was lucky to range qual with one in my 4 years.

Honestly though, I loved shooting it and didn't have any problems. Got out in 2013 and began looking for a carry piece. Found the 92FS Compact. Tested it out, along with some other pistols. Ended up buying it. Then bought a full size a year later. They get such a bad rap thanks to rumors propagated in the military. It's crazy.

File: doit.gif (2MB, 490x478px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 490x478px

>>32964680
I can't deal with the fucking safety billboard on the side:
DANGER FIRES WITHOUT MAGAZINE
READ MANUAL BEFORE USE
DONT FORGET TO CHANGE YOUR UNDERWEAR AND SAY HI TO YOUR MOTHER FOR ME

>>33008926
Im not sure why this makes anons cringe so bad. I never thought it ruined the gun. In fact it breaks up a lot of blank space on the frame that might look plain and wierd otherwise. Theres always been a lot to look at on a 92. The glocks by contrast have almost nothing on them small detail wise. I prefer it.

File: 3d6254f6bd68362ef818443c9d35a3c8.png (239KB, 329x443px) Image search: [Google]

239KB, 329x443px

>>33008926
its cause Italians handle pasta, not guns desu

>>33009090
Not quite, just lawsuit happy burgers, lawyers and stupid kids.

http://articles.latimes.com/1998/nov/17/business/fi-43618

>>33009376

>The case was thought to be the first to claim that a gun was a defective product because it did not incorporate "personalized" or "smart gun" technology--which could prevent a gun from being fired by an unauthorized person, such as a curious child or a criminal who obtains the gun by theft.


I winced.

>>33007749
There is LITERALLY nothing wrong with slide safeties.

File: 1402208299939.jpg (115KB, 678x800px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 678x800px

>>32970063
God damn there's something so endearing about a well used surplus gun ending up in the hands of a civilian, like a worn and torn up old soldier finally retiring into a comfy civilian life with someone who legitimately loves her, scars and all.

>>33009565
>Why do you know my deepest desire?
>Why do you know me greatest fear?
>Will I ever be able to take care of my children as well as I maintain my weapons?
>Could I really love a person?
>Could I stand a person loving me?