PSA has a deal on their premium BCG with hpt/mpi testing. Co

>>32915392
It's fine.

>>32915392
It is an excellent BCG and charging handle. I have the same, 100% reliable.

>>32915429
How many rounds have you put through it?

Some people say that PSA's QC isn't that great.

>>32915625
PTAC is shit.

PSA is as g2g as you could reasonably expect from a sub-$100 BCG

>>32915715
Is it worth shelling out for the more expensive BCGs like a Fail Zero?

>>32915765
Fail Zero is just a meme. No it's not worth it.

>>32915625
>PSA's QC isn't that great.
its middle of the road. but their cs is good so if you have an issue, return it
>b-but there shouldnt be an issue in the first place
while prefferable, shit happens. its good to know the product you bought has a good warranty and CS.
OP, you arent going to find anything better for less.

>>32915910
Which BCGs should I be looking at then?

>>32915392
Don't get that one. It has the shitty 6061 handle.

>>32916453
PSA is fine but they are always trying to jew you. Their parts will work but some are not pretty, and look like rejects from other retailers. Try the toolcraft ones. PSA is okay for back up or training BCGs.

Make sure you get the 7075 CH. Like I said, they are not transparent about the specs of their parts in the ads sometimes. You have to know exactly what you're getting or you'll be jewed.

>>32915392

I'd stick with a nickel boron BCG or something slicker than standard phosphate. It's only 20ish more and boy is it fantastic

>>32917919
Can confirm. Slick'er'n snot

>>32915392
They have this deal literally every other week.