Mark my words. The P320 will be the gun of the year
>won the MHS contract
>P320 X-Five coming out
>P320 RX Carry coming out
>P320 RX coming out
>P320 RX being the first optic ready handgun just under $800
The P320 is going places and there's nothing you can say about it. And I say this as someone who likes the Glock 19.
>>32713989
I agree. Pity it's such a fuckugly gun, though.
Sigs are trash.
>but muh military contract!
Military was also using the m9, which was objective garbage. They don't know what they want much less what they need.
>>32714098
>Pity it's such a fuckugly gun, though.
I actually think the compact looks exceptionally well with the small grip module. Then again, looks really don't count at the end of the day.
>>32714104
>Military was also using the m9, which was objective garbage. They don't know what they want much less what they need.
this x1000
>>32713989
Why would I buy one over another glock?
>>32713989
Glock MOS line is MRDS ready, and has been out awhile.
>>32713989
I guarantee by the numbers that by the end of this year the p320 will have a drastic drop in build quality to the point where glocknade looks like a fucking joke reee
>>32714104
>>32714135
>Beretta 92 design is garbage meme
will this never stop
>>32714317
>will this never stop
no yankee marshal, your gunfu is shit and will be forever shit..
>>32714196
>because they need a large amount of guns to be made, Sig will not be able to keep up thus QC will suffer
Any idea how I know you're a retard? Apart from thinking glocknade is an actual issue outside of Gen 2 .40 S&W's? Pic is a clue, by the way
>>32714098
agree, its ugly, pretty much all striker-fired guns are
>>32714121
>looks really don't count
this, basically. i carry a p320 (not compact though) because it really was the best choice but i just don't get the x-five at all. why add any "looks" features back to the 320?
sig already has other guns that look better, and/or are for competition -- which itself is about being fucking looked at while achieving unrealistic but highly technically-proficient feats of pistolcraft -- and/or are just target pistols, and so on. what the hell is the x-five actually for?
>>32714392
you're an idiot dudester
Was kind of considering picking a 320 up. Hickok45 and a few other said positive things about it. Not like I buy everything he reviews but he enjoys shooting and I enjoy shooting.
>>32714416
How is he an idiot? The SP2022 was mass produced in huge numbers, and yet is fine.
>>32714462
shut up you're dumb
>>32714104
>30 year old guns that were treated like shit and rarely cleaned were objective garbage
o k a y
k
a
y
>>32714546
Glad you understand.
>>32713989
It's an ok outcome.
>>32714098
Yeah, the Glock 17M would be just as good while being prettier.
>>32714104
The M9 is objectively amazing, 30 years of abuse and neglect, bad aftermarket mags and retards handling will fuck up literally any handgun. Yes, even your favorite.
Get raped you fucking mungsmuggler.
>>32714121
I guess that's ok, but the beavertail on that thing drives me nuts.
>>32714328
Wrong.
>>32714961
Stop posting.
>>32715060
You first chump.
>>32713989
B-but mah glawk foty
>>32713989
>Mark my words.
the shortest lived service pistol...just a guess, a shot in the dark if you will, but it will be replaced quite quickly.
mark my words.
>>32715076
Glock is a proven platform you fotm cuck.
>>32715070
Tell me a pistol that would do better under the same circumstances.
Bore Axis/10
>>32715656
The circumstances of being retard proof so braindead grunts don't shoot each other? Not many. In terms of actual performance though literally any other wondernine.
Except the vp9, because, well. You know.
>>32715760
>Except the vp9, because, well. You know.
Oh fuck off you idiot
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=eJr453erCAc&t=596s
>>32715906
Chokes on a small quantity of water, truck nuts. You fuck off.