Aircraft carriers need dedicated AA Ships just to defend them,

Thread replies: 16
Thread images: 8

Anonymous
2017-01-17 06:52:32 Post No. 32677399
[Report] Image search: [Google]

File: 5eca7f91fc8d.jpg (89KB, 640x472px) Image search: [Google]

89KB, 640x472px

Anonymous 2017-01-17 06:52:32 Post No. 32677399 [Report]

Aircraft carriers need dedicated AA Ships just to defend them, while underwater battleships don't.

Anonymous 2017-01-17 07:04:56 Post No.32677482
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-01-17 07:04:56 Post No.32677482 [Report]

File: 1472452600865.jpg (202KB, 700x346px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 700x346px

>>32677399
pleb not making underwater aircraft carrier

Anonymous 2017-01-17 07:29:12 Post No.32677632
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-01-17 07:29:12 Post No.32677632 [Report]

>>32677399

Someone please tell me what this mutated nightmarish contraption is

Anonymous 2017-01-17 07:31:06 Post No.32677639
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-01-17 07:31:06 Post No.32677639 [Report]

>>32677632
French interwar "submarine cruiser".

There were times when various countries experimented a lot with some crazy ideas.

Anonymous 2017-01-17 07:32:54 Post No.32677652
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-01-17 07:32:54 Post No.32677652 [Report]

File: I-400.jpg (242KB, 1273x811px) Image search: [Google]

242KB, 1273x811px

>>32677482

>>32677639
Which country(ies) didn't?

Anonymous 2017-01-17 07:37:33 Post No.32677675
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-01-17 07:37:33 Post No.32677675 [Report]

>>32677652
We're these subs actually decent? I remember hearing that the IJN had a plan to bomb the Panama Canal with them and it was actually underway when we nuked Hiroshima.

Anonymous 2017-01-17 07:39:37 Post No.32677687
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-01-17 07:39:37 Post No.32677687 [Report]

>>32677675
They were waste of material.
>>32677652
>Which country(ies) didn't?
To be honest French and Japanese were the only ones who tried to check if "FUCKHUGE SUBMARINE" concept works.

Anonymous 2017-01-17 07:40:55 Post No.32677692
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-01-17 07:40:55 Post No.32677692 [Report]

>>32677687
Well, I was mainly wondering about which ones refrained the crazy ideas in general, not just subs.

Anonymous 2017-01-17 07:41:12 Post No.32677693
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-01-17 07:41:12 Post No.32677693 [Report]

File: atlantis ulysses.jpg (189KB, 1081x558px) Image search: [Google]

189KB, 1081x558px

>>32677687

Even in Disney movies, submarines are cursed to die

Anonymous 2017-01-17 07:43:03 Post No.32677707
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-01-17 07:43:03 Post No.32677707 [Report]

>>32677399
Once under water a battleship has little need for AA cover.

Anonymous 2017-01-17 07:44:12 Post No.32677712
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-01-17 07:44:12 Post No.32677712 [Report]

File: USSArizona_HR-sstock.jpg (315KB, 1540x866px) Image search: [Google]

315KB, 1540x866px

>>32677707

Anonymous 2017-01-17 08:07:49 Post No.32677836
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-01-17 08:07:49 Post No.32677836 [Report]

File: Submarine Project 621.jpg (253KB, 1250x891px) Image search: [Google]

253KB, 1250x891px

>>32677687
Russians wanted to make transport/land assault sub but didn't get in early enough and were way to late

Anonymous 2017-01-17 08:13:29 Post No.32677862
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-01-17 08:13:29 Post No.32677862 [Report]

>>32677652
Thats not the i400, the i400 carried 3 planes.

Anonymous 2017-01-17 08:15:09 Post No.32677867
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-01-17 08:15:09 Post No.32677867 [Report]

File: Surcouf.jpg (316KB, 1504x830px) Image search: [Google]

316KB, 1504x830px

>>32677675
I400 and I401 were on their way but was halted by the surrender, captain shot himself and the dumped the planes in the ocean to prevent capture (also because they were painted in American insignias).

Pic not related

Anonymous 2017-01-17 08:34:52 Post No.32677957
[Report] Image search: [Google]

Anonymous 2017-01-17 08:34:52 Post No.32677957 [Report]

File: 6412361235.jpg (7KB, 254x199px) Image search: [Google]

7KB, 254x199px

>>32677399
Hi!

Anonymous 2017-01-17 08:55:27 Post No.32678040
[Report]

Anonymous 2017-01-17 08:55:27 Post No.32678040 [Report]

>>32677482
I've honestly been fascinated with whether this is technically viable, even if it'd be overpriced and low-utility.

Not like pic-related though, I'm thinking just with VTOLs.

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible. Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/

I'm aware that Imgur.com will stop allowing adult images since 15th of May. I'm taking actions to backup as much data as possible.
Read more on this topic here - https://archived.moe/talk/thread/1694/