is desert eagle only handgun using .50? is there a handgun that

>>32631674
No, Automag and Grizzly.
Yes.

File: 100_3326.jpg (159KB, 1200x536px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 1200x536px

Smith & Wesson Model 500

Why didn't you just google it, you worthless piece of trash? Both your questions are answered on the fucking .50 AE Wikipedia page. FFS.

>>32631674

50 AE while large in diameter is not as powerful as a good number of revolver rounds. What you are asking smacks of equating 30-30 with 300 win mag, as the 500 S&W, the current reigning champ for power in factory offerings in factory handguns, is the same diameter but far more powerful.

>>32631709
The funny thing about .500 S&W was that Smith & Wesson were getting pissy about not holding the current "biggest, most powerful handgun round" title.

>>32631792
Right and for strictly power via factory loads I think its the 460

>>32631674
A gunshop in my area has a single shot 30-06 pistol.
http://www.hendrixvanderputten.nl/webshop/pistool-imi/

File: M-4derringer.jpg (12KB, 500x276px) Image search: [Google]

12KB, 500x276px

>>32631674
>Biggest finest revolver
>chambered in 45-70 wrist breaker
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Magnum_Research_BFR

There is also a 45-70 derringer
>45-70
>3 inch barrel
I dare one you fuckers to start CCing one of those

>>32631936

Not as powerful as you think. Lots of wasted powder.

>>32631953
This. Unless you reload with really fast burning powders this chambering is wasted potential

>>32631914
>Voor het silhouet schieten
of zwartjoekels
>Vlamdemper
klinkt stiekem beter dan flash hider

File: 20161230_183129.jpg (711KB, 2048x1152px) Image search: [Google]

711KB, 2048x1152px

Magnum research makes a 45-70 decently powerful. 50ae isn't as powerful as many think. .500 with 500 grains=broken wrists. S&w500 I feel is the most powerful revolver. Desert eagle 50ae most powerful semi (depending on the load) both are fun to shoot. But stupidly expensive. Pic related I own both.

>>32632032
Helaas doen we dit discipline niet bij onze vereniging. Ze hadden er namelijk ook een in 7.62x54r.

>>32632056
shiiit, ik wou dat ik tijd/geld had om bij een schietvereniging te gaan

File: pfeifer-zeliska-11.jpg (49KB, 580x390px) Image search: [Google]

49KB, 580x390px

>>32632055
>S&w500 I feel is the most powerful revolver

>>32632055
>.500 with 500 grains=broken wrists

Yeah, if your wrists are made of glass. I have yet to see any evidence of people breaking bones from firing a .500 magnum. It's almost as embarrassing as that old fuddlore that .44 can break your arm if you fire it wrong.

>>32631674

no (see Magnum Research BFR)

no (novelty Nitro900 revolvers exist)

>>32631953
>500gr Garrett hammerhead bullet
>42gr IMR 4227
Oh man, I gotta try this.

>>32633976
>42
I mean 52. Fucking fingers.

>>32633917
>no (novelty Nitro900 revolvers exist)

What are you on mate? There are handguns that fire .45-70, not to mention .500 Magnum. I guess you could argue the bullet diameter isn't much bigger, if at all, but in the context of his question I think he meant if there's anything more powerful.

>>32633883

I had a contender pistol in 45-70 for a long time and shot it with moderate loads. When I first bought a 500 I was afraid that it was going to kick my ass. With factory loads it doesn't even kick as hard as the contender, which I had long gotten used to. The contender seems to recoil harder anyway though compared to most other guns.

The grips on the 500s soak a lot of recoil.

>>32631906
to be honest, they did a good job in both claiming the title and making the gun

File: 20160917_123225.jpg (4MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 5312x2988px

Hey, why does .454 kick harder than .500 S&W?

I shot both and .454 had far moar kick

File: firearms.png (520KB, 920x734px) Image search: [Google]

520KB, 920x734px

>>32631674

File: 14_5x114_MDZ_2.jpg (19KB, 500x270px) Image search: [Google]

19KB, 500x270px

Why not just use high explosive bullet with low velocity round? Less recoil, big damage and stopping power.

yeah but none of those are semi automatic so who cares

>>32631674
you fucking faggot, you murdered a defenseless thread with your autism

read the fucking sticky
read the fucking wiki
search the fucking archive

now go light yourself on fire you drooling mouth-breather

the kinetic energy required for ammunition to have armor or barrier defeating properties require it to have as much velocity & mass as possible

>>32631674
Wasn't the .50 Action Express invented for the Deagle specifically? Or am I pulling that out of my ass?

>>32639181
No, it weas developed by a guy working for Action Arms, but the Deagle was the only production model to use it.

>>32637048
Pretty sure outright explosive bullets are NFA items and nobody wants to pay $200 extra for a tax stamp per bullet.