alright guys, you've had a long fucking time to figure this

Shape doesn't matter as much as the angle.

File: m5k9jftplixubrxnub6u.png (286KB, 1280x860px) Image search: [Google]

286KB, 1280x860px

>>32605433
decide that too.
look at all these. they all use different grips. They should've decided which was best in the 50s and then put an identicle one on every rifle.

>>32605491
There is no objectively best grip shape, just like there is no objectively best handgunshape. Some people have hands that fit finger grooves perfectly, others can't stand them because they don't fit their hand size.

Though angle is a completely different story. Some people don't like the more vertical grips because they aren't used to them. That's fine, but they still reduce strain on wrist and are objectively better because of that.

>>32605549
for a Service rifle though that they're going to hand out stock to hundreds of thousands if not millions of people they can find the one that works best with the greatest number of hands.

>>32605806
different countries will have different "average" hands

although designing grips for "average" hands is a flawed practice that produces grips that fit nobody

>>32605418
B5/K2

File: ergo.jpg (50KB, 880x660px) Image search: [Google]

50KB, 880x660px

doubters judge it on appearance and have never used one

File: glock19.jpg (21KB, 500x500px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 500x500px

>>32605418
Can't improve on perfection.

Thought the OP pick was California