are these any good? can't believe stock glock sights

>>32565218
Spring for tritium night sights.

>>32565221
what if I don't shoot at night?

I like the concept of the TFO sights, one being that I need my front sight to be a little further back to focus on it properly.

Problem is the fiber cracked at some point and it no longer shone like a beacon. Turns out you have to send the sight back to truglo to get it repaired/replaced, this wasn't possible for me because it was a grey inport into my country, not an issue for aomeone who bought it at a retailer or loves in the US.

In short, they're a good sight but if the fiber breaks you gotta send it in to get replaced.

>>32565344
Wait, I thought thr OP was for the TFO (tritiu/fibre optic) sights, if not then disregard.

>>32565218

>Glock
>Plastic
>Oh, noes!!

Well ... how do i tell you ...

>>32565218
>made of PLASTIC

Some polymers are as strong as steel.

>>32565224
You would in home defense

>>32565218
Cool concept but like the other anon said they can be a bit fragile. I'd recommend tritium sights for a carry/HD gun and normal FO for range/competition guns.

File: 1437123475578.gif (202KB, 400x225px) Image search: [Google]

202KB, 400x225px

>>32565218
really, you can't believe it? it is just completely outside the realm of possibility that piece of shit glocks have piece of shit plastic sights?

>>32565464
I bet you think ceramics are mud, too.

Materials science is awesome.

>>32565497

High five for Science and Engineering!

File: homeboy.jpg (95KB, 480x605px) Image search: [Google]

95KB, 480x605px

>>32565218
They're not bad but ultimately no Glock is complete without these.

File: Punisher sights on top.jpg (107KB, 614x461px) Image search: [Google]

107KB, 614x461px

>>32565735

Had a set of TFO's. Front tube fell out on a 9mm. Would not recommend. Go for meprolight or trijicon.

>>32565344
Try YouTube re "how to replace your fiber optic front sight". Hint: it involves heat!

>>32565218
>can't believe plastic gun has PLASTIC

File: 1410958610668.jpg (37KB, 638x419px) Image search: [Google]

37KB, 638x419px

>>32565375

>>32565405
Lol no larry.

File: 1482293199206.jpg (76KB, 768x1024px) Image search: [Google]

76KB, 768x1024px

Just cough up the dosh for Trijicons. I have both HD night sights and the Bright and Tough night sights. The HD are worth the extra 20-30.

>>32566188
why is he sleeping?

>>32565422
What if I told you many guns have the ability to mount lights.

They're ok but the fiber optics aren't going to help you much in the dark. Their tritiums are only about $15 cheaper than Trijicons.

>>32565405
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Plasteel

>>32566188
did his SAR fall apart?

>>32565987
Too late for that, already tried replacing it long ago, wrecked the tritium vial, now I just use fiber optic in the front sight.

>>32567919
He's all tucked out the little scamp

>>32568446
irrelevant

>>32565218
TFX sights, tritium and fiber in one.

File: P1070121.jpg (750KB, 1467x1641px) Image search: [Google]

750KB, 1467x1641px

The TFO sights kind of suck... the fiber needs to be open on the sides to really gather light since the sun is rarely ever directly overhead, and they are pretty crap for moderate light applications because there is no surrounding dot that is more reflective (solved with the new TFX ones), and the night performance is crap compared to even 5 year old trijicon sites... So you might as well just buy the ameriglo I-dot pro because they are better in all conditions...