Hi, /k/. I recently obtained a Ruger 10/22 and a Redfield 6x

>>32551766

Doesn't look like the factory rail unless they changed them. I think it should be lower.

The peep sight option might involve mounting the new rear where the rail currently is, so keep that in mind.

I will send you a set of super tall see through leopold 10/22 mounts free if I didn't throw them away and they're still in the box of stuff I don't use in the basement.

File: 20150804_110318.jpg (2MB, 3096x1742px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3096x1742px

>>32551766
sell it and build a NDS 10/2

File: IMG_20170105_214250783.jpg (1MB, 2592x1944px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2592x1944px

>>32551864

It's not factory, but special ordered because it was advertised that I would be able to still use the stock sights. It was false advertising. If it were milled but a millimeter or two lower, It might have worked.

If there are options for other sights to use that may work(a little higher sitting) then I would invest because apparently the stock sights are terrible when compared to aftermarket ones.

File: IMG_20170105_214240044.jpg (1MB, 2592x1944px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 2592x1944px

>>32551864
If you do this, I'll send you this rail and maybe some ammo for a trade.

>>32551993
honestly with the factory ruger rail you can barely use the stock irons. and i mean just the rail

>>32551993
>It was false advertising.
I think you may have misunderstood. I'm pretty sure they meant you can take your scope off and don't have to remove the rail. it has a groove down the middle unlike the stoke one.

why would you trade cheek-weld just to be able to see your irons? if you're worried about breaking your scope in the field, just get QD rings

>>32552150
They were advertised as "see through" and inferred that the rail would still allow you to use the iron sights in the description.

I haven't owned a rifle before, but I was planning on using it with the scope I got with it, which, I believe would be very difficult for things that may be close. I tried these because I figured I would be able to use them if I wanted to use it for close distances, not necessarily that I thought my scope would break. I can also cheek weld if I use my left eye, but I haven't tried it out much because I haven't had the daylight to sight it in.

File: Screenshot_20170106-003142.png (1MB, 1440x2560px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1440x2560px

>>32552082

Not where I thought they were; I think I put them on an airsoft gun before I got rid of it. There's one more box somewhere around here.

These are the ones I'm talking about.

>>32551766
Here's your problem; you are an idiot. You ordered something gun related, from Amazon, and expected it to work as advertised.

Sage'd, go to the QTDDTOT next time.

>>32552410
I wouldn't have gotten them normally, but a verified purchaser told me that they actually did work. I don't know if that was a fake comment or what, but I'm not an idiot for believing that something works as advertised when someone else supports the claim.

In short, suck a dick.