What's /k/'s take on the Walther PPQ .45? I've fucked around a bit with Walther before, I liked them.
Any issues with em you know about?
>>32464493
/k/ has a hard-on for the PPQ
>>32464493
PPQ is nice, .45 ACP is stupid.
>>32464493
>Buying a German gun in anything other than 9mm
I dunno man, it's not like the Germans INVENTED 9mm or anything.
>>32464526
This. Stopping power is a meme. Personally I carry a 5-shot revolver chambered in .22 short because shot placement is everything and you'll never need more than 1 shot.
>>32464606
Good for you.
>>32464526
you're stupid
>>32464606
why not a bb gun
the PPQ has extremely light trigger pull, that could be an issue if you plan to carry it
it does have 12 rounds, 10 round double stack is a joke
>>32464493
Modern walthers are toys, get a real gun.
I wish they make PPQ in 10mm.
But 45? Not worth the width. It has energy of 40, bigger frame, less cross section density for same weight.
>>32464665
No, light trigger is not an issue for carry.
>>32464678
god damnit take your usp and get outta here
>>32464665
nah just keep your finger off the trigger until you need to shoot something. The PPQ has a light trigger pull but has a relatively long take up.
>>32464631
This post is the zenith of refutation
>>32464678
>>32464771
>nah just keep your finger off the trigger until you need to shoot something. The PPQ has a light trigger pull but has a relatively long take up.
read OP's spec sheet, 0.1" takeup is not long
>>32464771
Speaking of the USP it would be great for OP to consider one in 45.
>>32464805
That picture does a great job for visualizing your butthurt.
>>32464816
Damn you're stupid.
>>32464816
It's very long.
You know what trigger has short take up? Colt single action army.
>>32465345
To clarify, it's not too long in general, just completely acceptable to carry.
Unlike Colt single action army.