ITT: criminally underrated guns. >FNAR >Steyr M9

File: 1482542828343.png (258KB, 650x473px) Image search: [Google]

258KB, 650x473px

>Winchester 1200/1300 (especially the ranger line)
>S&W 1st-3rd gen semi autos
>Stevens/Savage 67,77,SXS (pre-outsourcing)
>Marlin Camp Carbine and Ruger PCCs

>>32432426
>le hunting FAL that looks like a commifornia ban compliant abomination
>le 6 steps below the FNS on the polymer striker handgun market
>le slide mounted upside-down safety high bore axis ugly

>own a Steyr M9

It's a neat looking gun and fun to shoot, but it ejects in an unpredictable manner.

Like occasionally flinging brass at or over my head as if to remind me to pick up after myself.

>>32432426
A little while ago I traded my px4 in for kimber 1911.

I do not regret my choice, 1,000 rounds in. Nothing against the px4, just not for me.

>>32432585
>sub-MoA from the factory
>comfy as fuck, literally through only polymer striker-fired pistol I would consider getting
>you've clearly never shot one, and slide-mounted safeties are fine if you aren't a retard

File: 1473288904448.jpg (103KB, 576x710px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 576x710px

Since the WWII surplus dried up decades ago, the M1 Carbine. Goddamn, I wish .30 Carbine was still a cheapo caliber you could reliably get at any gun store. I had a chance to shoot an M1 last year and it was beautiful. The cartridge is just great. It's everything I could ever want in a cartridge for general outdoors and utility use. I wish it was still in wide circulation. ARs have pretty much taken over everything, though. You'd get laughed out of any of my local gun stores if you came in asking about .30 Carbine ammo.

>>32432624
>sub MOA FAL
Bullshit

>>32432426
Walther P99

>>32432694
I'll one up you with an 88
My dream white power gun

in what fucking universe is the M9/Beretta 92 underrated you dumb fucker?

>>32432681
Only thing it shares with the FAL is that it's a .308 that uses a short-stroke gas piston. The rest of the gun is entirely different.

As for sub-MoA, it's literally guaranteed by FN, and they'll apparently take your rifle back and fix/replace it if it isn't.

>>32432711
LOL

Embarrassing

>>32432715
Oh we are talking about the FNAR. That's not even remotely FAL. I believe sub MOA.

>>32432722
The original idiot I was responding to >>32432585 thought it was just a fudd-ified FAL. If anything it's closer to a hunting SCAR, because they at least both use roughly the same operating principles.

File: 1350599818148.jpg (80KB, 787x497px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 787x497px

>>32432716
oh sorry I'm drunk