I want an EDC gun and I've narrowed my choices down to the

>>32408392
P2000sk shits on both.

>>32408392
rami is going to be a bit heavier, so keep that in mind. either way both fine choices.
I biased towards CZ because I find FN to be boring and I like the trigger more, but thats just my opinion

>>32408398
How so?

>>32408412
>>32408398
thought so bitch nigger

>>32408392
rami's are really heavy and have feed issues, honestly id go with the FN. Much better quality.

>>32408392
I would personally go with the FN. Controls are smaller and more streamlined, if the trigger is anything like the full size, you'll be pleased, and I also just prefer striker fire.

Also, any reason you're not looking at the Shield? I feel like that would be excellent for summer carry given how thin it is.

If the FNS is being considered have you tried looking at the glock 26 or p320 subcompact? Glock 26 is probably dimensionally the smallest double-stack subcompact while the p320's modularity and better grip angle are neat features.

>>32408392
I honestly would buy either of these but I'd go with the FN. can you tell us what attracted you to these?

>>32408392

Either get the Rami DA/SA with a decocker or the FNS compact without a manual safety but for the love of god whatever you do, don't spend money on a subcompact carry gun with a manual safety.

>>32408392
I'm not a huge fan of pointy beavertails on an IWB gun. It's too much pokey-pokey in the fat roll-y.

>>32408392
You have good taste in guns as far as good looks go anon. Haven't shot either but both are on my wishlist

File: 3.jpg (2MB, 2007x1966px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2007x1966px

I'm not sure why your choice is between a hammer fired and striker fired, usually people have a preference to one or the other and choose between two of the same.

Go with the FNS-9C, excellent quality, striker fire. It's the master race of the compact double stack 9mm market. Get the non-safety version.