Why doesn't /k want to operate with women? Is it because

>>32398421
Because hardly anybody on /k/ operates anyway.
Also I wish these "women in the military" threads would equal bans. So tired at this point.

>>32398421
If they were held to the same standard then no one would give a fuck.

Unfortunately in the real world, they aren't.

Why doesn't /k want to operate with the parapalegic?
Is it because you are afraid of being inferior to them?

File: women in combat.jpg (1MB, 1860x1880px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1860x1880px

>>32398421
This is why.

>>32398421
its not about the airforce its about on the ground infantry. A 120lb woman is not going to be able to drag a injured 250lb marine to safety

Why don't I want to operate with someone with less strength, less endurance, less stamina, limited logical and rational thinking ability, prone to mood swings and emotion driven decision making?

Now that I think about why am I even straight.

>>32398421

i'll say this. there's an attached female and three female WSOs in my fighter squadron. two of the female WSOs are useless and have been DNIF for a year or two. one is getting requalified after giving birth. she's actually useful. and one is not too bad but was the source of some major drama (though less lately after we confronted her about it).

War is the province of men.

Women don't belong combat, or even a uniform.

File: 1481820821434.jpg (105KB, 457x461px) Image search: [Google]

105KB, 457x461px

>>32398551
Hello there.

>>32398551
So basically any of the basement dwellers that hang around here on a turkish soapmaking forum.

>>32398574

But my penis likes girls in uniform.

>>32398667
No, they look like shit.

>>32398685
>STOP LIKING WHAT I DONT LIKE WAAA

>>32398692
They have vests and helmets. You cant even see the hair dude.

Liking them is the same as liking dudes with feminized faces and you dont need a cunt fucking things up when you have your fuck buddy.

File: uniform.jpg (56KB, 500x623px) Image search: [Google]

56KB, 500x623px

>>32398708
he didn't say combat uniform you sperg

>>32398708
>Uniform means combat gear

Yeah no.

>>32398421
Because /k/ is full of /pol/ losers.

>>32398794

Basically this.

Sure, females isnt as good as men, but a platoon of 20 males + 10 females is always going to be better than a platoon of 20 males only.

>>32398818
I'd take just the 20 dudes, did you not read this post:
>>32398519

They ruin small unit effectiveness.

>>32398818
Your logic is mentally impaired at best. What is the benefit of 20 males + 10 females? Why not 30 males? It's not like we have a shortage.

>>32398838
Hmm. I have been in both mixed and male only platoons, and I didnt notice any reduced effectiveness.

Id say that even tho those females are rare as fuck, some of them are cool, and they should be allowed to serve.

>>32398843
Im not from the US. And yes, we have a shortage where I live.

File: 1482238544326.jpg (48KB, 500x750px) Image search: [Google]

48KB, 500x750px

>>32398708
Pleb detected

File: smirk sam hyde cop.gif (1MB, 484x305px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 484x305px

currently fucking a 5'1 102lb blonde O1 engaged to an O4

they're okay I guess, but they should probably be in their own gender segregated units and relegated to clerical duties

I have "operated" with them before, it was terrible. Men belong in the military, that's it. Next question.

>>32398653
I wouldn't operate with a bunch of fat NEETs either.

>>32398708
sounds like youre cunt m8

>>32398421
Because we have talked about this 100 times and shit gets boring

>>32398421
Because many men will put themselves at risk to protect a woman in a combat situation, White Knights, if you will. Not only does this endanger a second soldier, but it also puts the rest of the squad in a compromising position.

>>32398818
No, the marine study showed that all male units performed better than mixed units, putting 10 females in with the males will slow them down and make them less efficient overall

>>32398421
Don't wanna get cooties.

>>32398884
who is this semen demon?

Because women are cunts and I like fucking cunts not working with them. Thay's because I'm a man though, little faggots like you might think differently.

>>32398708
>> Liking them is the same as liking dudes with feminized faces
well I like that too

>>32398452
The Marines officially requested exemption from having to operate with women

>>32398421
A) They have lower fitness standards
B) They'll create dramas themselves, and men will create dramas by competing for them.
C) They have babies and fuck off.

> study released in September 2015[40][41] found that women in unit created to assess how female service members perform in combat were significantly injured twice as often as men, less accurate with infantry weapons and not as good at removing wounded troops from the battlefield.

>The research also found that male Marines who have not received infantry training were still more accurate using firearms than women who have.

you can use them as interpreter officers and nothing else

they are weak both physically and mentally, and dont know what honor is

>>32398421
Come back when they can pass a normal PT test

>>32401005

So a platoon of 20 soldiers magically beats a platoon of 30 soldiers?

Id like to see that happen.

>>32404919
>Numbers are the only thing that matters
>Inferior numbers have never trumped superior numbers through better training and better capabilities

File: Silouhette Dan.gif (4KB, 597x605px) Image search: [Google]

4KB, 597x605px

>>32398421
It might be different for the air force, navy and other pog forces, but I was infantry recon in the Australian Army from 2001-2004 and the women were among the worst soldiers, but the shit male soldiers washed out on the recruit course, but everything was done to make females as comfortable as possible, we had to carry their water and some of their gear for them, they got more time on runs and had to do less sit ups and push ups on basic fitness assessments, women belong off the battle field, keep them on ships, in planes and in offices.

>>32404919
You ever hear about the Korean War and the human wave assaults conducted by the Chinese?

>>32398818
You've obviously never served with women in the infantry.

I know /k/ is all about armed forces and shit, but how many times do you need to make these threads? Why the false flagging, nobody on /k/ thinks they make acceptable infantry already. Trying to turn /k/ into another pathetic /r9k/ or /pol/ where you hate women just because they represent the left? Why not you know, talk about funs not who uses them.

>>32398421
>Implying a bunch of neckbeard basement dwellers are in any way capable of operating

>>32398421
it all boil downs to this:
>>32398519


i.e the US army is too retarded to implement a proper integration policy, they go overboard and the usual salty permavirgins sperg out against females as a whole because MUH ROASTIES RUINNING MUH MILITARY


also, /k/ - thinly veiled /pol/ threads all day, every day

>>32405009
Wut? I don't hate women, I just don't think they are fit for infantry duty.

>>32405034
Nice try IHOP.

>>32404935
>>32404990

The thing is that there will still be 20 males, they are not getting worse at aiming by having 10 females 20 meters away from them.

>>32405134
>they are not getting worse at aiming by having 10 females 20 meters away from them.

Except they are, dipshit.

>>32405134
Thinking like this is dangerous, you're honestly telling me that male soldiers having to baby sit female soldiers will be as effective as a team not baby sitting female soldiers.