How can we make this thing look aesthetically pleasing?

Already is.

Black cock has conquered Europe and now they want more

>>32368298
Remove UGG

File: 27078009081_964f37d0ac_b.jpg (134KB, 1024x989px) Image search: [Google]

134KB, 1024x989px

>>32368298
Too much exposed barrel?

File: space_SCARs.jpg (2MB, 3264x2448px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3264x2448px

Put a veil on it.

For starters
>Add something to that lower rail.
It doesn't matter what, its just empty space and it looks off.
>Have it not be 3 different shades
Unless it's just a terrible picture.

File: c6205dd1-94f8-4252-9dbc-72b1ad41782e_zpsa673af60.jpg (2MB, 2163x1613px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2163x1613px

>>32368341
You can also paint it like a whore

>>32368298
Make it black, give it a 20in barrel and a correspondingly longer upper, and replace the boot stock with the ACR stock.

File: Photo1FNP45withOsprey.jpg (42KB, 480x314px) Image search: [Google]

42KB, 480x314px

>>32368378
>Make it black
But desert tan guns are pure sex

File: 1469110972795.jpg (265KB, 1334x1000px) Image search: [Google]

265KB, 1334x1000px

>>32368378
Almost everyone who puts the ACR stock on takes it off. Boot is based as fuck

File: 519BA07C-9C79-478B-B9BE-E49195600497_1.jpg (201KB, 800x600px) Image search: [Google]

201KB, 800x600px

>>32368398
Wrong color light and optic

File: 1478022950010.gif (544KB, 303x357px) Image search: [Google]

544KB, 303x357px

>>32368409

File: tumblr_of1fqfmenA1s5ffrqo1_1280.jpg (256KB, 1024x767px) Image search: [Google]

256KB, 1024x767px

>>32368494

>>32368326
>t- someone who doesn't own one

protip: the ACR stock that KDG offers is shit compared to the UGG. I have both.

>>32368805
Congrats, it still looks like the ugliest boot ever made.

>>32368298
I already wanna fuck it dude. think it's sexy.

Lengthen the rail and paint the whole thing the same color

File: tumblr_ofzb4nln231sdxszuo1_1280.jpg (151KB, 1080x718px) Image search: [Google]

151KB, 1080x718px

>>32368904
Its probably the best stock available on any rifle today.

>>32368520
>part of the flashlight blocked by the can

Fucking retarded KYS

>>32369013
The fuck are you talking about?
The flashlight is under the can.

File: falstockscr.jpg (30KB, 610x343px) Image search: [Google]

30KB, 610x343px

>>32368298
here you go

>>32368399
We're talking aesthetics, not function.

>>32369099
What rifle is this? I just started collecting guns and I've seen this gun before. What is it and how much does it cost to make it usable/pretty?

File: Stock Boot - Oboz.jpg (1MB, 1557x3585px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1557x3585px

>>32369107
Boot is fine

>>32369124

It's an fn SCAR with an FAL stock shooped on and it'...

well it actually turned out pretty decent

8/10, would touch with tip of penis

also:
>what does it cost

for a stock SCAR, a lot.
just literally all of the cash you have and then some

doesn't matter which caliber either, shit's expensive yo, Belgium's gotta feed those immigrants somehow

>>32369107
FN Herstal SCAR. A very expensive, but very highly-acclaimed rifle platform. This is the SCAR H, basically the AR10 of the series.

>>32369107
the KDG stock looks gay too. Honestly, the Ugg is nice looking as well as nice feeling.

>>32368881
well, your face is the ugliest thing I've seen, yet your mom didn't abort you and you keep using mirrors, so....

between looking gud and feelin' gud, I pick feelin' gud 'very time if I were the user.

Go be a fag elsewhere, fag.

File: xcrmgen1.png (1MB, 1023x767px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 1023x767px

>>32368298
Its called the Robinson Arms XCR M

>>32369844
Muh Dick

>>32369844
Hope your never need customer support from them.

>>32369044
>flashlights are lasers

File: 1.png (40KB, 872x279px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 872x279px

What's so wrong with it right now?

>>32370180
Disgusting looking ugg boot stock. Barrel is exposed too much.

>>32368308
FPBP.
The SCAR looks great, m8

>>32368341
Hey, that's not too bad.

File: 1.png (44KB, 814x276px) Image search: [Google]

44KB, 814x276px

>>32370208
Stock is autisto since it's the ACR stock but any buffer tube stock would look weird as fuck.

File: 1463455377164.jpg (97KB, 761x241px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 761x241px

>>32368298
done.

>>32368929
The ACR stock is decidedly better. It's stronger, more durable, has all the same adjustments, and is more aesthetically pleasing. The ACR itself is shot but the stock s objectively the best. Slap one of those on a Scar and you're good to go.

>>32370292
Kek

File: 11.png (41KB, 860x277px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 860x277px

There

Fixed it.

>>32368399
How much does that weigh? That scope looks awfully beefy.

>>32368399
Why is that? I have been thinking of getting the acr stock for it.

File: 1481077515213.png (1MB, 980x566px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 980x566px

>cause fuck traditional stocks

>>32370377
Its to bad they are only making Airsoft stuff.

>>32370377
>rail on a rail
but why

>>32370692
probably because your cheek would sit too high. an appropriate height risers makes it more consumer mount/optic friendly.

File: 1467238750406.jpg (21KB, 400x400px) Image search: [Google]

21KB, 400x400px

>tfw you actually shot a SCAR 17 with a Geissele trigger on it
>tfw you finally saw first hand at how amazing of a shooter it is

One day, I'm going to own a 17, FDE and everything.

File: IMG_1442.jpg (2MB, 3024x4032px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3024x4032px

>>32369180
>implying its expensive

>>32368308
Literally looks like a fake leg

File: IMG_1013.jpg (121KB, 1024x768px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 1024x768px

>>32368298
aesthetic

>>32368334
yes.

>>32368520
A S T H E T I C

File: image.jpg (215KB, 900x601px) Image search: [Google]

215KB, 900x601px

>>32368334
This, but with the VLTOR stock adapter.

File: CZ-805-BREN-S1.jpg (103KB, 1000x558px) Image search: [Google]

103KB, 1000x558px

>>32368298
Sup nerds

>>32368308
/thread

>>32371722
CZeched
aaand NOW /thread

>>32368298
Put the barrel on top and the gas system below?


Is there a way to make it look less fat? Really the stock looks retard huge.

>>32369844
So close, if only the optics matched

>>32368298
NYET

rifle is fine

>>32369099
Omg, the SCAR is just an FN FAL with an AR lower! That's some star wars splicing bullshit.

>>32368298
Literally just change the stock

File: image.jpg (245KB, 850x447px) Image search: [Google]

245KB, 850x447px

Like this?

Can someone shoop an older 249 stock on a scar? It would look neat. Ive seen them on ptrs

>>32370292
>CA compliant

Good lord I'm glad I moved outta that shithole

>>32370757
i'll sell you mine for 6k

File: neat.png (28KB, 846x341px) Image search: [Google]

28KB, 846x341px

>>32372261
I got you!

File: IMG_2566.jpg (108KB, 532x529px) Image search: [Google]

108KB, 532x529px

>>32370793

See >>32373291

And that's just the ladies!

>>32373376
Its beautiful. Il take 3

>>32370377
GitS/10

File: mesa_tactical_92550_10.jpg (100KB, 1500x1000px) Image search: [Google]

100KB, 1500x1000px

>>32370260
It's not that odd looking actually

>>32370293
Most people who have tried both disagree with you

File: 1fY3PSx.jpg (97KB, 800x533px) Image search: [Google]

97KB, 800x533px

>>32371722
Not much, how's the endless recalls and parts revisions going?

>>32368308
FPBP

>>32370293
You must have a shoulder made of marshmallow.
Or you're just talking out of your ass.

>>32373567
what scope mount is that

>>32373777
ADM

>>32373779
thanks!

>>32373779
seriously thanks so much i've been trying to figure out what mount that was for months

File: Cheers.gif (494KB, 500x324px) Image search: [Google]

494KB, 500x324px

>>32373843
np

>>32370292
Oh my god

>>32373575
>recalls
link? google has nothing

>>32374130
Article I read it in is down.
Essentially the issues with the bren was that cz tried to cheap out and design and test it in CAD, and go essentially into full production after that.

There were a number of revisions that came out, some were recalled, and they further refined the 805 to the 806.

It's a fine gun though, just went through some birthing pains as the Czechs tried to cut corners and draft on Belgian engineering

>>32368298
Toss it in the trash and pick up an M-14!

Problem solved

>>32374596
>Literally the worst battle rifle

>>32374826
Prove it!

>>32374838
DoD did it for me
https://looserounds.com/2015/01/30/the-m14-not-much-for-fighting-a-case-against-the-m14-legend/

>>32368805
>>32368399

Since when did the boot become good. isn't it flimsy as hell?

>>32375305
Its pretty strong, stronger than m4 receiver extension stocks

>>32373575
806 aka BREN 2 is actually decent gun and supervised by actual army personnel

>>32376059
After about a decade of work into the system, yes the 806 is pretty good. The early 805s were not so much

>>32370292
lmao

>>32373144
ny desu

>>32376059
still no ar changeable pistol grips. TRASH

>>32375728
>stronger than m4 receiver extension stocks
There's a bunch of those. Are all of them really crap?

>>32370292
>skipping leg day

File: Alton Brown and his raifu.jpg (252KB, 762x1022px) Image search: [Google]

252KB, 762x1022px

>>32368298

It looks fine aside from the Ugg boot stock. I mean its not the prettiest rifle in the world regardless; but the stock is the only really ugly part.

>>32369844
Remove the rails, remove those optics and you're close.

>>32368298
You can get an ACR stock
The real problem is the price

>>32368298
It looks good with a scope or in black.

>>32375047
>clickbait titles
>facebook links
>advertisements everywhere
Normally I wouldn't respect a man who is so clearly a sellout but I've seen that linked before so I feel it might be worth a retort.

All that article is saying, essentially, is that the manufacturers fucked up badly and some soldiers didn't know how to properly disassemble and maintain their M14.

To address the first point, it's not like we've ever seen Springfield and Winchester make manufacturing mistakes before, right? No, of course not, they're perfectly infallible. As far as H&R is concerned, well, they probably should have stuck to revolvers. They simply did not know what they were doing and it effectively bankrupted them. While they were working on the M14 it was known they needed constant advice from Springfield. Later, when they were manufacturing the M16A1, they needed constant oversight from Colt.

He's very wrong to propose that most soldiers don't know how to maintain their M14 though. How can you simultaneously suggest that it's one of the most beloved and grandiose battle rifles to ever be produced (that has such a cult following that whenever you speak ill of it there will inevitably be a throng of bitter veterans coming to defend it) but nobody actually knows how to take care of the damn thing? He even gets a bit snippy with his readers over it. Suggesting anyone who owns an M14 only puts a hundred rounds through it a year is just silly.

Also
>citing 404'd links and "muh army buddies" as credible sources

>>32378967
Boot is best