Why the fuck did they put the mag on the top instead of on the sides or on the bottom?
>>32333063
More reliable feeding, out of the way while shooting prone, easier for support crew to load.
>>32333063
Or more importantly why wasnt it belt fed?
>>32333063
It was fun. We just have to put Iron sights on the bottom of the magazine.
>Pic unrelated
But it's breakfast time
So it could be mounted on stuff.
>>32333080
Because it's supposed to be light and fast to reload.
There were some pretty roomy drum magazines available if you want that.
They're expensive collectors items now though.
>>32333063
Because everyone has been holding it upside down for almost a century now...what would Lizzie the 1st think...
Dumb question here
Can Brens be fired off hand?
Or are they very much "get your bipod on something, THEN pop off"?
>>32333323
Yes, they can. They are a great design, that's why they were used pretty much until now.
>>32333114
Ya and fukk koffee, who needs the spike in bp? Way2old leche connoisseur here that never surrendered my affinity for "straight from the tap" goodness. O, and like, mmmmmmdonuts.wav
>>32333063
DESU it was when we were still trying to figure out the best configurations for weapons.
It was after the war everyone kind of agreed it was annoying to have the mag on top and moved away from it.
>>32333402
You fucking lost me dude. Guess I can't chill with the Go Hards. I'm 30 I retire.
>>32333495
her tips almost made me confuse that VZ for an AK
>>32333530
funk I gotta turn off autocorrect on this new bullshit
>>32333530
Females anon. They'll make your oenis dance.
>>32333323
Think FN-MAG/MAG58/M240, except magazine fed instead of belt.