If the hpc used glock mags, it'd be a perfect pcc, prove

Hi points arn't known for exploding.

Its fucking hideous.

>>32249235
So is your mom lol rekt

>>32249201

I'd have bought one if it used those mags.

File: 1481002741661.png (152KB, 360x444px) Image search: [Google]

152KB, 360x444px

>>32249276
lol savage!

>>32249201
sub2k would still be better

Used my friend's once. Rather inaccurate.
Or maybe I just suck.

>>32249786
It's a pistol carbine. Not generally a sniper rifle.

>>32249786

Good enough for shooting raccoons in my garage, the mags are terrible tho.

>>32249235
>>32249201


Reminds me of those 80s sci-fi movies, has that retro dark future look like something that evil enforcers of the government empire might use.

In that context I love it actually.

but for standardization it really should use glock magazines, and somebody ought to make an aftermarket conversion that allows it to do so since the sub2000s are unicorn fucking rare (are the militia stockpiling those or some shit?)

easier to make an aftermarket thingie that goes in the grip than make a high capacity magazine that works well, nobody wants to get the saw out after their existing mags either

>>32249786
You just suck, mine is pretty accurate, especially for a $200 pcc

>>32249856
Ya they are, which is why they need glock mags
>>32250045
I'm amazed there's honestly not more after market parts for it, its a decently popular gun. One day maybe

>>32250045
>sub2000s are unicorn fucking
I have three, all in 9mm. One of them is an updated gen 2 and the others are gen 1s. They're pretty cool desu.

File: Redball Sports’ 20 Round Hi-Point Carbine Magazine.jpg (41KB, 900x460px) Image search: [Google]

41KB, 900x460px

>>32249856
>>32250145
If 9mm, the new 20rd factory mags are supposed to be better.

If .45ACP, supposedly you can modify 1911 mags to work in them.

>>32249201
Cant fix ugly. Practical? maybe, but not perfect.

>>32249201
What's so great about glock mags other than it being $19.99?

>>32254631
Cheap, standard, better than the low cap hi point mags

>>32250045
>aftermarket conversion from a single-stack mag with a 1-piece receiver+grip to a doublestack mag
yeah no, not going to happen.
>>32250145
>aftermarket parts
>for a $180 ghettoblaster
Be thankful for the few parts you have.

>>32254631
Cheaper than Hi Point mags

More reliable than most pistol/PCC mags

$20

Not patented (or patent not enforced)

>>32254631
Cheap, standard, can buy them anywhere, and it would then make a good trunk gun for police, run out of mags for it, just start using your glock mags

>>32254631
You can buy cheap 33 round mags that work very well

>>32254631

Most people own a pile of Glock mags thats why i ended up building a 9mm AR15 with a glock lower.

>>32249201
not as cool as my mechtech ccu that takes glock mags...

>>32250045
>keltec makes guns many people want
>production has never met demand
To be fair they're a relatively small company that makes their own guns and not some chucklefucks machine shop that shits out AR lowers.

>>32249201
Actually I stumbled on something about how people were taking M1911 magazines and modifying them for the .45cal HPC.

Well there are some drums for the M1911, most of them dont work, but there is a ~$70 clear plastic drum for the M1911 that several people have said works wonders.

28 round drum made in South Korea.

Has some of the same design features as the X-Products drum and thats the reason for its stability.

If it fits in an M1911 then it can be modified for your HPC and now you've got a .45cal high capacity* (depending on your definition).

However since you'd have to modify the mag thats $70 of "gonna have to make this work" to be putting on the line for your carbine.

For one magazine.
Which is one step more tedious than usual to load up than a standard magazine.


>>32252658
so thats where they went huh...
YOU have them...
you son of a bitch...
(j/k)