What would be a good gun that has the simplicity and mud-and-muck reliability of the AK series, but chambers a 5.56 NATO round (not just a .223)?
Pic mostly unrelated.
>>32169872
Galil or Sako in 5.56. Is literally a 5.56 AK.
>not just a .223
Protip, anything imported that says .223 is probably built for 5.56, but stamped .223 because of restrictions on military rounds. Since .223 is a civilian round, they can make and sell guns for it more easily a lot of places.
http://www.k-var.com/shop/SLR-106-Series-5.56x45-Caliber-Bulgarian-Stamped-Receiver-Rifles/
AR is more reliable than AK.
>>32169872
Sig 556 is bretty good, look it up
SLR106 or Beryl.
>>32169872
>mud-and-muck reliability of the AK series
lol watch some mud test videos some time
ak fails before ar does
>>32169872
Get the Tavor. The Tavor was designed for the most elite military in the world and is funded 100% by the U.S.A.
>>32170002
that and 223 in CIP is the same as 5.56
>>32169872
An AR15 you memeing noguns tripfag. Kys
>>32169872
Go back to /a/ you fucking weeb.
>>32170131
do not. this man is trying to make a joke. don't let it go over your head.
>>32169872
>simplicity and mud-and-muck reliability of the AK series, but chambers a 5.56 NATO round
Sounds like you want an AR-15, OP. Why though? 5.45 is superior.
>>32170131
This guy knows what's up. I bought two of them at once (one for my wife), we love them so much i might get another for my wife's son
Why 5.56? 5.45 is superior. Anyway, get an AR-15 or a Galil if you want an AK in 5.56.
>>32169872
Pick most plebian gun and most worthless combat round ever. Then combine them.
Pottery.
>>32170075
Yeah, i have one.
It is extremely accurate and has had far fewer failures than my ak.
Little front heavy, but i think it is objectively better in every way to an ak except cost.
>>32173033
Lel, underrated
>>32173135
How good or bad of a round it is isn't the point. The point is if SHTF, you couldn't expect to rely on imported Soviet-era ammunition.
>>32169872
Daewoo k2/ar100/Max/dr200
84s/bwk-92
Sar-3/wasr-3
M90np
>>32173033
good kek
Beryl ^^
>>32169872
Pic 100% related actually.
A Swiss SIG is basically a better sealed up AK in 5.56 made to absurd standards.
>>32174578
Oh, interesting.
>>32174578
*was made to absurd standards. Any spare part produced after 2000 is literary cancer tier qc. Everytime I have to throw away a screw at the diopter for every ten i replace.
Fuck them so called Sig. They are not the SIG of the last century.