Someone please tell me why you would do this. It dosent even look good.
>>32137634
Not a fan of the color scheme, but the slide and barrel look interesting.
The same reason niggers have gold teeth and massive rims on a POS crown vic. Mental retardation.
>>32137634
I think it looks amazing, but, I would have done it in British racing green.
there's like 9 fast and furious movies, that should explain our society for you
>>32137634
>I have a degree in engineering.
Dude I bet that barrel cools hella fast with all that venting.
Plus think of the lessened recoil impulse?!
8/10 would shoot
>>32137696
No, pink. Raceguns should be CUTE.
Because for some people, generation 4 Glocks aren't unreliable enough.
>>32137634
It's fun to have something different. Not every gun needs to be earth tone and ready to operate.
>>32137634
Op some people have different preference (honestly I like style) and
>>32137718
Please refer to yhis
>>32137719
That's not a race gun. It's still in stock or production class.
>>32137760
Fuck atow correct
This
>>32137754
That's a gen 3 in the photo and it's not the summer of 2010.
>>32137702
Best reply
>>32137660
Here, have mine
>>32137784
There is no shortage of unreliable generation 4s, they are no more reliable than 3s, don't be an obtuse twerp.
>>32137634
I'm only posting because from a glance in the catalog it looked like a giant Glock sitting in the middle of a dirt road.
>>32137814
I own two gen 3s and two gen 4s. I shoot both steel and IDPA where both guns are in heavy use. The original problems from 2010 were extremely limited and as evidenced by your post, grossly over stated now almost 7 years later and 5m gen 4s in service.
Call me more names. It's the way you ein the internet.
>>32137634
It looks kinda neat but the fucking griptape clashes with the slide so hard.
>>32137718
Honesty the heat dispersion wouldn't make a whole hill of beans either way.
>>32137856
Just because 95 out of every 100 generation 3 and 4 Glocks function as they should does not excuse the 5% which do not. You got lucky.
It's widely known that generation 3 and 4 Glocks, compared to the competition, suffer far more reliability issues. Particularly feeding and erratic ejection. It's not something I've made up. Do a search on Youtube for Glock failures, and then do a search for M&P failures or XD failures. The lion's share of results are Glocks.
Now you're adding self-righteousness to your obtuseness. Which is by no means surprising from you, you're an insufferable narcissist.
>>32138184
Hey, you're a nogunz internet expert. you just parrot stuff you've read with no hands on experience.
>>32137754
both OPs and your pictures feature Gen 3 Glocks, its kinda confusing.
>>32137634
Normies have shit taste in just about everything. I remember my senior year of hs, sitting in chemistry having to listen to two "country boys" decked out in christ kyle and realtree clothing drool over skeletonized ARs and new lifted F150s the would never drive off the pavement. Fuck normies
>>32137856
my late 2015 G19 is back at Glock as we speak for BTF issues
>>32137754
>Staging photos of perfection failing
>Cut yourself in the process
Serves you right.
>>32137634
ever been in an /arg/ thread? same shit there.
>>32138208
he's not wrong though my gen4 is a jamomatic
>>32137696
>>32137719
please never get a job that involves making any sort of aesthetic decisions.
>>32138208
>anyone not namefagging, tripfagging or avatarfagging is noguns
There's that narcissism again.
>>32137634
>Someone please tell me why you would do this.
Less mass moving I assume?
I don't understand people that think a 19 needs recoil reduction but it's their money.
>>32138351
You don't even own a Glock.
>>32138184
>implying you need luck to avoid 5% lemon rate
>lying about M&P's jam rate compared to Glocks
The Glock haters are swarming on the thread.
Go do research yourselves and ignored the trolls.
>>32138523
No, just you is a nogunz. It's just you.
>>32138351
Maybe you have limp wrists or your dremel gunsmithing didn't turn out like the video said it would.
>>32138604
5% of any product which does not function is unacceptable in any industry.
Holy cow the Glock apologists are deluded.
>>32138651
And that 5% cited above is just a made up number.
Hasn't had a single jam that wasn't attributed to bad ammo yet.
>>32137634
>My opinion is the only valid opinion and anyone else with a different opinion is retarded.
>>32137634
It's the only way to make a Glock look good.
>>32137634
I think it looks great the fluted barrel and the cut outs will save weight.
>>32138184
Yeah but 5% of the trillion glocks sold is a bigger number than the 5% of 15 m&ps
>>32138184
>Particularly feeding and erratic ejection
I just got a G17 Gen 4, new in the box. 500 rounds in and it's still throwing brass at my shoulder, chest and sometimes my face. Some youtubers say to replace the guiderod and spring with aftermarket, others say it's the ejector or extractor claw. anyone have this problem and what fixed it for you?
>>32140647
Ejaculating on the guide rod seems to help I've learned.
>>32137718
slide weight reduction makes a huge impact on felt recoil
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Limp_wristing
>>32137754
Had that issue with my secondhand Gen 3 G17 from 2008.
Ejector had worn down, bought a trigger housing, removed ejector from the new housing, placed into old housing, works perfectly again.
Apparently they used ejectors that wear out too quickly for a while.
This red and black shit needs to end. It's getting out of hand. It's like some kind of virus that makes men want to cram dicks into their mouths.