I'm looking at buying a new set of eyepro/shades and need

>>32092558
>Oakley's

Another choad is born.

>>32092569
And a prick is present, would you look at that?

>>32092558
To be fair, the SI M-Frames don't look too bad. The black ones don't look gaudy and since the lens shape is different, they don't look like the standard M-Frames almost at all. They fit really well under electronic earpro and helmets too.

$40 a lens is too damn expensive though.

>>32092558
i think the arms on the flak are too thick and triangular to fit comfortably under earpro. However, it might be different if youre wearing something with thick gel cups, i use howard leight lopros which have thin cups.

>>32092619
Better a prick than a criminal.

>>32092715

>certain sunglasses make you a criminal

holy fucking shit nigger fuck off with your prejudice

>>32092675
Are you talking the 2, or the 3? Or that new Alpha stuff?

>>32092692
I'm still trying to mine my resources because my supply chain won't buy us Peltors, but I'm just using the Impact Pro phones, so no gel

>>32092619
Oakleys are "try hard": the glasses
>>32092724
He's not me. That doesn't even make sense to me either.

>>32092729
I've got the 3's. Helps that the fit my face pretty well and they cover all my vision.

>>32092907
I was hoping to find a pair of frames that would be not ridiculous looking off the range too... But looks like I might just have to go those.

Anyone have the whole alpha set up? Feel like it's worth it?

Any good options for prescription ballistic glasses?

wiley x is another option.