What does /k/ think of SUVs with guns?
I don't think it's armored enough. I believe pic is VDV unmanned air droppable version but still I do not think it's armored enough to be able to do its job. Not as good as Toyota technicals or Chinese equivalents.
Would you agree that they should've just bought Chinese instead?
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=pNeDOONlAFs
Is it really unmanned or there is a midget inside driving it?
>>32088778
I was inside of Tiger once, they're huge.
>>32088387
It can be a fine solution against suicide-bombers on armoured cars.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=IXJQyoakJTM
Two words OP.
Trunk monkey.
well that's a stupid idea all around
>>32088387
The Chinese make even worse shit.
Are you same Chicom shilling every thread?
>>32088387
do you really think an unarmored toyota with a .50 in the back is better than a 5 man armored SUV with a .50 turret and room for cargo? c'mon...
>>32089390
You could probably buy 5 Toyotas with the amount you spend on that.
>>32089422
How much do you think a Toyota costs?
>>32089422
But you could not get 5 crews. People are more expensive than equipment retard.
>>32089447
Except a toyota is far more vulnerable, and just because they are cheap doesnt mean they are better. Hell, a moped and an AK47 is cheaper than a toyota, why not use that? the logic is just dumb. better crew protection, logistical support, and in general tactical functionality is built into any armored car
>>32089594
Are you sure you replied to the right post numbnuts?