>no s-ducts confirmed >generic curved ducting on par with

File: 1479508108709.png (139KB, 648x771px) Image search: [Google]

139KB, 648x771px

>30 year old tech demonstrator for forward swept wings less stealthy than modern stealth fighters

>>32064197

You must've not been here for the "Vatniks can't into S-Ducts" threads.

File: su-47 (4).jpg (142KB, 1065x635px) Image search: [Google]

142KB, 1065x635px

>>32063939
Su-47 was modified for PAK FA weapons bay tests around 2008 or so. Its original weapons bay was much wider. Why do ignorant mad fatniks like embarrassing themselves on /k so much? Is this some sort of a fetish?

>>32064396
>making up complete horseshit because you're this mad

insane.

File: 200171.jpg (168KB, 1400x953px) Image search: [Google]

168KB, 1400x953px

>>32064431
>All of the sudden turning blind because you are a mad fatnik that got humiliated on /k once again
Poor little thing. Here's a picture taken in 2008.

File: 124774.jpg (86KB, 1200x827px) Image search: [Google]

86KB, 1200x827px

And here's a picture taken in 2005. Next time educate yourself before posting, fatnik.

>>32064468
>>32064487
So where are you supposed to be countering the op again?

>>32064468
>>32064487

>Still no S-Ducts clearly visible.

That really fished my chips.

>>32064514
He apparently thinks that retrofitting an aircraft with a new narrower weapons bay for testing somehow straightens the ducts that had their section crossed by the old wider weapons bay and to the larger portion by the chassis bays.

>>32064545
>Ducts are clearly visible to be S-shaped and have their section crossed by both weapons and chassis bays
>Fatnik keeps shitposting
So why do ignorant mad fatniks like embarrassing themselves on /k so much? Is this some sort of a fetish?

>>32064561
but their sections weren't crossed originally

>>32064601
On the contrary, they were and still are, regardless of the type of a weapons bay with which the aircraft was later retrofitted for tests.

>>32064637
then show a pic of it

>>32064594

>Can't find a picture head-on of the aircraft to show it's S-ducts definitively, has to fool himself into believing they actually exist using conjecture.

How very Slavic of you.

>>32064271
Didnt you mean "Pafka cant into S-ducts, but vatniks must goalshift because they are butthurt"-threads?

>>32064640
Indeed, show a pic of both weapons and chassis bays disappearing in another dimension as opposed to the duct section.
>>32064649
>Can't find a picture head-on of the portals to another dimension that apparently exist is Su-47's weapons and chassis bays and allow them to open anywhere but the ducts' section
>Is demential enough to still believe this is what happens
How very fatnik of you, fatnik.

>>32064694
so you're saying that you do not have an image to prove what you say, but say that the ops pic is wrong

okay

>>32064694
>fatnik
>I have been call vatnik so many times that i must go into NO YOU mode
russian/10

t. other guy

>>32064700
No, I am saying that you don't have an image to prove what you say and the OP is an ignorant fatnik that didn't know that Su-47 had wider weapons bay prior to being used for PAK FA weapons bay tests.

>>32064727
So you're saying that you do NOT have photographic proof of what you say that nullifies the OP, and thus cannot be proven?

>>32064713
Why do fatnik get so upset when they are being called out for their bullshit, but at the same time keep up with their ignorant uninformed fatnik shitposting? Is this some sort of a latent fetish? Like that you enjoy being a humiliated ignorant fatnik on /k, but can't accept this part of yourself?

>>32064734
Just so you know, there is a high chance you are debating with that idiot that told us for month that the Armata is smaller than an M1A2. That obvious retard stubbornness and mindbending to be right, while when anyone else would do it it they would be totaly retarded for it, is quite showing.

>>32064734
The photographic proofs of that Su-47 had wider weapons bay were posted.
>>32064761
>Hand-made plastic model is a real aircraft
Fatniks are this desperate.

>>32064803
So you still do not have photographic proof to justify what you say and instead we're supposed to take your word for it instead all because you can't be bothered to post any kind of evidence of what you say?

>>32064829
The photographic proofs of that Su-47 had wider weapons bay were posted.

>>32064778
Why are vatniks so butthurt so easily when they act like trash the most time to others and ignore the bad behaviour of their own? I cant name one nation that is so deluded, arrogant and simply wrong like them. And i am not even from the US or like them pretty much. You simply dont get how deep you are stuck in your hypocrite mindbubble.

>>32064837
All you've shown is that it had a different set of doors. You have not shown that it's weapon bay was larger like you have insisted.

>>32064843
The real question is why do you like projecting so hard? Is this a stage of denial when you get humiliated on /k once again for being an uninformed ignoramus but refuse to accept that this is a fetish that you apparently enjoy?

>>32064882
why not just post some pictures to end these threads once and for all instead of being fanny flustered?

>>32064803
>>32064837
>The photographic proofs of that Su-47 had wider weapons bay were posted.
BAHAHA! It is the retard claiming that the Armata was smaller than the M1A1. So whats yout plan for this one?
Acting like a arrogant fuck like always, demanding to be right, while not providing for anything, later act like nothing happend and whine about how russians and russboos have a bad reputation here.

>>32064852
I've shown that it had a wider weapons bay that, unlike the narrower one which which it was later retrofitted, is wider and crosses ducts section.

>>32064910
but you clearly have not.

you've only showed images of the door seams

>>32064904
>Fatniks is out of arguments
>Wants to stop getting humiliated on /k
>Secretly enjoys is, apparently
Poor little thing, I think you should accept having this fetish of being a submissive ignorant faggot and let it go.

>>32064882
>N-o you
>NO YOU
>NOOOO YOOOUUUU!!!!!!
>REEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEEWWW
There is nothing to project, just the constant repeating of your errors and denail of them a second later.

>>32064934
I certainly did, since the picture shows that the original weapons bay is wider and crosses ducts section.

File: 1400295776124.png (73KB, 329x292px) Image search: [Google]

73KB, 329x292px

>>32064942
>The vatnik always puts the relationship between individuals or countries and the US in explicit terms of sexual dominance, a telling sign of Russia’s sometimes amusing but ultimately disturbing masculinity crisis. Refusal to bow to Putin’s Russia is bending over or getting down on one’s knees for the United States, the only other country in the world that matters. To this end the vatnik likes to portray his enemies as prostitutes or passive homosexuals, unwittingly revealing his fears and insecurities about sexual domination and humiliation. Insults revolving around oral and anal sex are par-for-the course when discussing politics with the vatnik, regardless of age.

>While on that topic, the vatnik despises homosexuals. He knows from watching Russian state-owned media that the West is “Sodom and Gomorrah.” He refers to Europe as “Gayropa,” and his best argument against the EU Association Agreement at the heart of Maidan was that it would lead to same-sex marriage in Ukraine- even though it had nothing to do with that. The vatnik is utterly unconcerned with the fact that thousands of Russian children in the country’s dilapidated orphanage system are subject to physical and sexual abuse.

File: 1416179785160.png (10KB, 477x539px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 477x539px

>>32064942
>After getting BTFO so many times i just will go for the same approach and declare self victorious
Sure is working great for you.

>>32064958
This fatnik now enters hysterical denial stage. Poor little thing, I hope one day you will accept having a fetish of being a submissive ignorant faggot and let it go.

File: su24-1.jpg (29KB, 600x347px) Image search: [Google]

29KB, 600x347px

>>32064963
You posted an image showing the doors, not the weapons bay.

Lots of aircraft had had items that "cross the ducts" and still didn't have s-ducts.

>>32064979
>Fatnik is always trying to change the subject after getting humiliated for being an uninformed ignoramus
>>32064986
>After getting humiliated for being an uninformed ignoramus he enters hysterical stage and is now posting memes
Sure is working great for you, being a fetishist and enjoying being a humiliated ignoramus.

>>32064999
Are you mad you got exposed for your shitposting again? What are you going to do?
Cry "this fatnik is broken. bring me a new one"? Or just autistcly ignore stuff directly adressed at you like >>32064734 and just reaponse with an answer like this >>32064837, which you would never accept from the other side? Or whine about my grammar?

>>32065005
Too bad we are talking not about "lots of aircraft", but about one particular aircraft that has them.

>>32065066
Then prove it. You've done nothing but show images of the doors and not the weapons bay itself.

>>32065055
Are you enjoying being exposed again? I bet you do, being a fetishist and enjoying humiliation. Cry "photos prove nuffin!" and keep living on your fairy tale world where Russians have invented portals that allow them to construct weapons and chassis bays that lead somewhere but the ducts' section.

>>32064761
>scalemodels.ru
wat

>>32065079
The fatnik saying that the weapons bay's doors do not lead to the weapons bay. The fatnik damage control is real.

File: 1463449341001.png (106KB, 298x298px) Image search: [Google]

106KB, 298x298px

>>32065033
>I get called vatnik before, so i must call them fatnik, no matter why
>And if i just pretend i won the arguement maybe someone else will fall for it to
>better start ignoring how there is no one supporting me in advance like always or i might get what a fool i made again from myself

>>32065129
I'm patient. I'll keep waiting for you to show the weapons bay.

>>32065131
You should accept your fetish, fatnik. Deal with it and let it go.

>>32065144
He cant, he is in the denial mode like always, now he is going to pretend that the posting of his pictures means something, while he would called anyone else wrong for it.

>>32065144
Indeed, you are patient. Only a patient fatnik can keep getting humiliated and returning for more with every thread he creates.

File: 1461882967255.png (115KB, 534x548px) Image search: [Google]

115KB, 534x548px

>>32065163
>Deal with it and let it go.
Coming from you this is rich.

>>32065173
>Actual pictures of the actual aircraft don't matter
>Only fatnik fetish matters
I get that you enjoy being humiliated, but it interferes with your perception of reality and you really should seek some mental treatment.

>>32065197
Rich portion of humiliation for an ignorant fatnik in denial.

>>32065194
Show me posts in this thread that supports you, or what you are saying, that are NOT from you. Now compare that to the post who are against you.
>getting humiliated and returning for more with every thread
is about right, but you dont seem to get in which direction it goes. Like always. kek

Since you get so easily confused, i am not the guy you are responding to.

>>32065221
We sure enjoy how "everyone but you" gets humilated.

The fun thing about vatniks simply is how they dont get, that they are a posting Streisand Effect.

So any chance of seeing some of those images that prove the vatnik correct once and for all?

>>32065344
Normaly they have photoshopped or false ones for something like this, they spam them everywhere, when debunked they first sperg put how it cant be wrong, later act like it was never posted, only to try i a bit later again, hoping people already forgot about it.

>>32065253
The posts that contain the pictures of the actual aircraft, as opposed to fatniks spewing out squeals of enjoyment from being humiliated ignoramuses.
>>32065274
You sure enjoy your fetish.
>>32065298
The fun thing about fatniks is that how they simply enjoy being humiliated too much.
>>32065344
Not if you are a handicapped fatnik fetishist that enjoys being a humiliated ignoramus to the point he is unable to use mouse wheel.

>>32065448
Just keep telling yourself you are not the one making a fool of yourself, you mignt even could believe it yourself.

>>32065396
>Lies! Photoshopped!
This is beyond pathetic. Poor fatniks are so deep in denial mental treatment is probably already powerless to fix anything.

>>32065448
Dude, no offense but could you just shut the fuck up? You make everyone who is russian or interested in russian stuff look like a drooling idiot.

>>32065448

>Posts pictures to "disprove" "fatniks"
>Multiple people point out the pictures "prove" nothing
>HURR DURR, JUST LOOK AT THE PICTURES!

Vatniks, not even once.

>>32065481
Since I am not the one squealing something about photoshop, weapons bay doors that lead somewhere except for the weapons bay and chassis and weapons bay that are hidden in another dimension as opposed to crossing the ducts' section, it is obviously you who is a handicapped fetishist that enjoys being a humiliated ignoramus.

>>32065448
When are you just going to post the image of the weapons bay like you said you would?

>>32065503
Dude, no offense but could you enjoy being a humiliated ignoramus a little but less loud?
>>32065506
>Pictures of the aircraft having a wider weapons bay as opposed to what OP fatnik was implying prove nothing because I say so
Humiliated fatniks, every fucking time.

>>32065525
No, you are just the retard that says that a closed weapons bay is somewhat good as a open one. As if you woild circlejerk over that fact if the sides where switched you little hypocrite.

>>32065540
The picture of a wider weapons bay that the aircraft had prior to the PAK FA weapons bay tests was posted.

>>32065573
Says a fatnik fetishist that enjoys being a humiliated ignoramus, implying that weapons bay doors lead somewhere except for the weapons bay and that chassis and weapons bay are hidden in another dimension as opposed to crossing the ducts' section

>>32065572
Okay, you are just retarded, no more questions.

>>32065609
The vatnik fantazising how a closed door shows exactly what is behind it, talking about denial.

>>32065609
>fatnik fetishist
>humiliated ignoramus
>hidden in another dimension
The Vatnik has posted himself into a fit!

>>32065586
Still waiting on an image of something more than doors

Will Russia ever catch up to China and America?

File: 1479689798633.jpg (191KB, 1065x635px) Image search: [Google]

191KB, 1065x635px

>>32065721
>Still waiting on an image of something more than doors
How about doors with a retarded vatnik?