Why do we need bombers? Can't cargo aircraft just drop

Why do we need guns?

Can't we just set off firecrackers and shot in plumbing pipes?

File: jqpnexme8siuimsknw4a.jpg (46KB, 800x322px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 800x322px

>>32029633
If you have a hypersonic cargo plane.
Or it's a fucking 747.
KC-130J etc is doing its thing in low-intensity.
Not unimaginable to drop a daisy cutter from anything when bullets aren't flying around

>>32029637
Set them off from afar and suurounded by guns.

>>32029667
>daisy cutter

thanks guy that watched the movie avatar

Why do we need cargo planes? Can't we just use gliders?

>>32029772
Why do we need gliders? Can't we just use trucks?

why can't bombers just drop cargo out of their bomb bays?

File: 1479259575768.gif (2MB, 659x609px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 659x609px

>>32029711
https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/BLU-82
> nicknamed "daisy cutter" in Vietnam and in Afghanistan for its ability to flatten a section of forest into a helicopter landing zone
Was pretty spectacular to see them explode. Only saw them from the air though

>>32029810
Why do we need trucks? Can't we just use AeroGavins?

>>32029837
Why do we need... Wait, what?

>>32029850
Save yourself from hell

https://www.google.com/url?sa=t&rct=j&q=&esrc=s&source=web&cd=6&cad=rja&uact=8&ved=0ahUKEwj4ioGEorDQAhUKq1QKHfLvDc8QtwIIKjAF&url=https%3A%2F%2Fwww.youtube.com%2Fwatch%3Fv%3DSwHqLtK_TpY&usg=AFQjCNE243PdpX1A9_RS6g73oH2bVm0C0g&sig2=xHzTKy8bWLLxeoB7LNxejg&bvm=bv.139250283,d.amc

>>32029850
http://www.combatreform.org/tanksthatfly.htm

Pretty much the best idea ever. No flaws.

>>32029711
>Being this retarded

It's okay, anon. I'll help you out

https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/BLU-82

>>32029810
Why do we need trucks? Can't we just use horses and oxen?

>>32029904
Why do we need horses and oxen? Can't we just use sled dogs?

>>32029861
This is the greatest thing ive ever seen!

>>32029633
>Can't cargo aircraft just drop bombs out of their cargo bays?
yeah you can
it just sucks

>http://www.spiegel.de/spiegel/print/d-26109882.html
>Mangels einer ausreichenden Zahl von Bombern setzte die Luftwaffe auch Transportflugzeuge vom Typ Junkers Ju-52 ein - die Brandbomben wurden ungezielt mit Kohlenschaufeln über Warschau verteilt.
In case you can't read German:
>be '39
>Luftwaffe wants to bomb Warsaw because muh Lebensraum or whatever
>have like a grand total of 20 bomber aircraft availiable
>but hey we got loads of Ju52 transport aircraft
>the Junkers has this handy loading door on the side
>idea.exe
>load the Ju52 with incindiary bombs
>also load two poor fucks from the wehrmacht into the rear
>hand them a shovel
>have them just chuck them out the side when over Warsaw
>Warsaw burns down
>ggwp

tl;dr its ludicrously inaccurate, not exactly safe for the crew, and looks pretty darn stupid

also transport aircraft are waaay slower/less armoured/have less defenses/little to no ecm/... than dedicated penetrating bombers.

also, its ineffective. you ever wonder why, when they want to bomb sand people in syria, they either send in carriers or they fly loooooong range from either conus or some other stockpile in centEU? why would they not just, like, start from a closer place?
its because when you want to use bombs, you ship them in either by ship or by train, anything else (cargo plane, or maybe trucks? hahaha nope) is just impractical as fuck, because them bombs are heavy.

>>32029711
Anon, you cant hide. From us maybe, but not your own shame.

Just admit you were stupid, and we will respect you for it. This is your chance, to be a better man.

>>32029667
>We will block out the sun with our Tomahawk Cruise Missiles
muh boner