What is the most aesthetic pleasing tank of WWII?
I voted for the Tiger II
S35 SOMUA
>>31975358
Yeah the Tiger 2 but without that shitty grid system that it has going
>>31975480
You mean Zimmerit?
Not technically a tank but I dont give af
kawaii af
>>31976061
fug forgot pic
Still used by the poorest nations
>>31975358
>>31975358
Der Kugelpanzer
>>31976107
and still beautiful in a strange way
>>31976146
Come on, at least use the beastliest version.
>*cough*
gang way, most effective TD of wwii coming through
>>31976512
>gang way, most effective TD of wwii
BS
M4A1
>gotta love dem curves man
>>31975858
What's the idea behind the horizontal castings/markings/lines?
>>31976583
It's a anti magnetic paste, the intent was to prevent magnetic shaped charges being placed onto the side of the tank. It was applied with a spatula like grouting compound.
Problem was the Germans were the only ones to have these type of mines and the allies never really developed any of their own, due to the maintenance issues of the zemmerite and the time it took to add is was dropped in I want to say 44ish
>>31975480
Not all KT's had them zemmerite desu
>>31975427
CUTE
>>31976512
>A.E.S.T.H.E.T.I.C
>>31975358
Anyone care to speculate a bit about how well a T-64 would do in WW2?
>>31976651
The t-64 was a fabulous tank, even though it isn't that 'well' known. There was some blog that a guy does going into detail about russian tanks, and he did an article on it.
>>31976606
Thanks Anon.
Step up your game you lily livered fag bags!
>>31975358
Panther or King tiger. Can't decide, they both were the definition of A E S T H E T I C
>>31975358
You people are all niggers.
>>31976651
It would wreck everything and everybody. I mean, what kind of a question is that?
>>31976728
Late war Tiger I and Waffen-SS camo are the most /fa/ combination ever devised.
>>31976741
Tiger I is sexy as fuck but slopes are more aesthetic. I vote for King Tiger or Panthers
>>31976703
Panthers were shit, but they got them aesthetics.
>>31976651
>Anyone care to speculate a bit about how well a trained soldier would do against 9 year old children?
You dont even have to ask the question
The T-64 would wreck everyones shit in world war 2.
A tiger would wreck everyones shit in world war 1.
A Mark 4 tank would wreak everyones shit in 1812.
>>31976740
>It would wreck everything and everybody. I mean, what kind of a question is that?
but would it? would it really?
>>31976765
This, like what do you expect? T-64 in WWII would be like ayy lmaos joining in for fun. You can't win against them, best thing you can do is to caputre one and reverse engineer it.
>Germans build Leo 1 during WWII thanks to caputred t64s
I like that idea.
Off yourselves, filthy wehraboos. Best tank coming through.
>>31976808
gas yourself islandslav.
>>31976651
>anyone care to speculate how well an AK47 would do in biblical times?
Go be retared somewhere else
>>31976777
Remove ayy
Would print and frame if the mickey mouse ears werent there to shit up the picture.
If anyone has a high res version of this picture please post it.
>>31977305
seems like the mickey ears can be shopped out really easily
just do that m8
BIG
>>31976606
>Problem was the Germans were the only ones to have these type of mines and the allies never really developed any of their own
did the sowjets use them?
>>31977305
>Well Ivan, this is it. We're about to die. Any last wishes?
>yeah, open both taches so 70 years from now, some guy on vietnamese rice farming forum will be pissed becasue we ruined perfect picture
>i told you not to drink coolant.
>>31977408
MEATY
>>31977441
Inconsiderate fucks. I am glad they are dead.
>>31975358
T-80U
>>31977481
>>31976583
what >>31976606 said.
There was this odd paranoia that the Germans had that caused them to protect their vehicles from their own weapons. They were really the only ones to use magnetic mines. The Russians never really used them.
>>31976072
This. The 911 of tanks.
>>31977462
128mm
>>31977481
*blows up*
>>31977481
*loses it's head*
>>31977481
*blows it's top*
Matilda is cute
(this is an Australian one with a flamethrower)
I also like the comet
>>31976741
I prefer early Tiger and standard black uniforms
>>31975427
Fpbp
>>31977417
They may have in small numbers. I like to believe zimmerit was developed due to German over-engineering. They probably expected their enemy to occasionally capture German weapons and use those against them. The Soviets used plenty of captured panzerfausts towards the end of the war if I'm not mistaken.
>>31976688
Scauce on the blog?
>>31977541
I think the germans thought
>well shit these magnetic mines are good, and if we can design them then they should not be too difficult for the allies to have them too esp since they may have captured some.
TFW no one else cared for magnetic mines
>>31976965
WTF those aren't Chi-Has, are they? They appear to be Chi-Nu types. I knew that some were built to defend the Japanese mainland, but it's the first photo I see of them.
>>31977305
>>31977333
>>31977441
>>31977465
Here you go anons
>>31980431
could be, getty captions arent always correct
>>31977481
>Chechens internally
>>31975358
Tiger II is the only answer.
A-Am I beautiful? Am I enough Tank?
>>31979269
>>31976688
Seconded, source pls. I thought you meant Tankograd, which has an autistic amount of detail, but he hasn't covered the 64 yet.
>>31977462
CLAWS
>>31977481
>T-80UD
>wehraboos, Slavs, and islandcucks
>on MY /k/
Best tankful coming through.
>>31982903
oh how those engineers must be bitching
>>31976544
Ew, it looks fat and sloppy. No wonder it's american.
>>31982983
>a tank that got overrun by hordes from the east
No wonder it's German.
Fucken Sherman Firefly.
>that groovy barrel camo to disguise the fact that it's a Firefly by making its barrel look like a short 75
>>31980931
it's not tankograd, I like his blog but he's only done t-62. I'll try find it but since then I've completely formatted my pc and I don't remember what it was titled
>>31983029
ayyyy
>>31975358
If I was going with the tiger II at least select the porsche turret, it may of been flawed in combat, but it looked sexy.
>>31975358
>Their tanks aren't amphibious
>Their tanks dont have removable pontoons
>Their tanks dont convert to an adorable mini tank
>>31976606
it was also flammable :^)
Churchill
Get fucked commies
Regardless of their combat history I really like T72s, they just look mean.
>>31976766
modern composite armor causes any standard AT rounds to simply shatter, and is designed to fuck with shaped charges, which means no AT grenades or bazookas are going to be that effective either. It would annihilate any tank in its range.
That said you could probably still shoot the tracks off with regular AT guns, giving you a mobility kill if you managed to get a shot in before it wrecked you.
A successful and accurate divebomb air strike might have a chance at destroying it.
>>31976621
1/16?
>>31976651
It would do well like the KV-2 did well when it held off an entire tank company on its own, but it'd be hard-pressed to change the course of the war, and still be vulnerable to AT mines.
>>31976777
Leopard I wouldn't help that much as it's still vulnerable to the 75, the 88 already goes through everything the allies had like butter, and it would be yet another class of tank whose logistical needs were entierly different from every other tank. For most intents and purposes, it would be like a German Hellcat.
>>31984184
>KV-2 did well when it held off an entire tank company on its own
are you sure you didn't mean KV-1?
KV-2 seems unlikely with that slow loading time mainly HE rounds instead of AP. Its also a howitzer, and its not that easy to hit tanks with indirect fire.
>>31984072
They look generic as fuck
It's like the staple food of tanks. Plain, boring, and uninspiring. This does not take me to flavourtown, anon.
>>31984346
They look only generic because they're that iconic of a tank.
Not a single Churchill in thread. I am of great disappoint.
>>31976072
>>31977684
Hetzer gonna hetz.
Boxy design, thick front, plenty of exhaust vents, no overlapping ugly wheels.
>>31975427
Adorable tho
>>31984367
Nice, I've always loved them too. English Bulldogs in tank form.
Not technically a tank but fuck is it sexy.
HNNNNNNNG
>>31976701
>French tanks
>When German troops saw an armoured formation including the unusual looking machines noisily making their way toward them, they retreated back to their starting positions. It was then decided to pull the tanks back to keep their nature secret.
>Even though the tanks' speed was very slow (7 km/h (4.3 mph)), their armour was able to withstand small arms fire. In the second half of September, a battalion was formed equipped with NI tanks. In one episode, the tanks entered a village occupied by German troops and while under fire were able to tow away 24 German guns.
>>31977408
Saw this big guy in Kubinka
It was a big SPG for me
STURMTIGER!!
Most aesthetic tank right here
>>31976493
>that pike nose
HNNNNNNNGGGG
>>31984216
>are you sure you didn't mean KV-1?
Kolobanov certainly had a KV-1, but he might be talking about Rasainiai - nobody's really sure whether that was a KV-1 or KV-2.
Went to Belgium last week, saw this bad boy.
>>31984695
>>31983668
Err, am I missing something? How does that camo pattern work?
Like, the white part only works if you're looking at it from a lower angle so it's lost in the sky, and the green part only works if you're looking from up above and it's against grassy/forest backdrop.
As it is, if you're approximately at the same level (which would be almost always if it's a tank engagement), you get the worst of both worlds because even if one colour is perfect camo, the other colour would be really visible.
>>31984816
It disrupts the silhouette. I'm not sure how effective it is, but it has fooled me at first glance- which does make the difference in tank engagements.
>>31976701
Cocorico
>>31977684
>the 9/11 of tanks
Come on, anon. You must be exaggerating, it can't be that shit of a tank.
>>31984816
when tanks are engaged in cocmbat they usually do it from behind hills at first, to soften the enemy, and only then charge, when popping behind a hill its importent to keep the element of surprise, this is why antenas are kept folded during combat.
the under part of the gun will be the first visible thing and will give the enemy a head start on where the tank is gonna pop up.
>>31984184
KV-2 is a meme tier piece of shit that never did much good, KV-1 was the better tank
>>31984512
NI?
>>31977032
not good cos you would run out of ammo
but how woulda steel sword made in modern times do back then
Late Panzer III models. No doubt
>>31986080
Aestethic
>>31986080
mah nigga
>>31986104
Oh yes, check this butt out
>>31984614
You're so close to the actually best looking tank.
>"Fuck you, I don't need tracks. I got a 75mm gun and go 80 km/h!"
>>31986162
That's not the one with a 75mm gun tho. That's the version with a 50mm L60
Best tonk
>>31986162
>>31986178
When the fuck gayjin will add this to shit thunder?
>>31986178
I know, my bad. I have more then a couple puma saved and messed up.
Easy
>>31986282
IT'S EVOLUTION BABY!
file name related
>>31986310
Furry weeaboos who also want to fuck tanks. Wow.
>>31976701
>Flandes
it really is a tank for wearing skirts
>>31986159
The bob semple is good but it can't beat this ass
>>31983941
Looks like something out of WH40k desu
>>31976072
That's not a tank.
>>31986203
It is damn sexy though
>>31984496
Reminds me of a ps2 game called seek and destroy
>>31980823
yes you are
>>31984110
1/6th scale >http://eastcoastarmory.com/kingtiger.htm
>>31984959
a true military genious
>>31984558
Mah dude
>>31988680
He literally said that in his post autismo
>>31976072
>>31977408
>>31977684
>>31980823
>>31982983
>>31984558
>>31984695
>>31984701
>>31986203
>>31989621
>>31992599
>Tank
/k/ please. no turret, no tank.
>>31983941
At least our tanks are actually...you know...tanks.
>>31992679
What is this thing?
>>31992729
its a landship, a "water tank"
>>31976493
>ww2
>>31976544
Why not keep doing it like this? Sexy as fuck.
>I find the lack of shermans in this thread utmost disturbing,
How about a classy early pattern Long Hull M4A4 to even things out
>>31992803
>I find the lack of shermans in this thread utmost disturbing,
Thats because this thread is about aesthetically pleasing tanks.
>>31992727
the amount of self propelled guns in this thread, I'm surprised you guys really know the definition of a tank. In what way is a Type 2 Ka-Mi not a tank?
>>31992852
You shut your whore mouth >:(
Nothing beats the clunker aesthetics of an early model Churchill
>>31992952
it looks like a fat american girl with a flat face and massive nose
>>31993000
Panther + Ambush camo in color = unf
>>31992929
I clearly meant that Jap tanks were shit at doing actual tank stuff. Like fighting.
Not a tank, but the Ferdinand/Elefant just looks plain mean
>>31986380
Wait you don't want to fuck a tank? What the hell is wrong with you?
B I G
I
G
>>31992987
I'll take her over the stocky slav with the angles on her face that can cut a roast, or the 500lbs sausage swallowing kraut that can't walk more then 20ft without getting winded
>>31986380
>>31976763
>Panthers were shit
Prettiest little tonk coming through
>>31976072
The G13 was built after ww2
>>31992679
check out this tank
>>31976606
Nope. It was non glare camo paint.
>>31977408
>>31975358
For some reason, although it never made it past prototype, the T-14 pleases me. . .The sole survivor at Bovington is missing some of it's side skirts
>>31992679
>>31984701
Better?
>>31993024
They wrecked the brits in burma.
Great thing about jap tanks is they were so light they cold cross improvised log bridges, meaning you could get them to places that no one else could get tanks.
For 1939, Japanese tanks were excellent. Those same designs obviously dont hold up to later allied designs, and all their more decent designs were kept back on the mainland for defense. The 1943 Chi-Nu is essentially a Pz.IV equivalent, but with a much better gun (closer to the 85mm of the T-34/85) and would likely blow a regular Sherman out of the water.
Loltraktor incoming
Mein Vater was a roflcopter
No pershing. You all disgust me
>>31993952
was the m3 Stewart ever used vs Japan ?
>>31993988
they should have just make bigger versions of it lol
toastin tankfu
>>31976072
cuteness is fun until you have to actually ride in it
>>31976886
>islandslav
>>31975358
Tetrarch
>>31994074
>m3 Stewart
no such tank friend :^)
Stuarts were used yes. A Chi-nu would annihilate a Stuart without much difficulty, even up to 1000m away
>>31994119
are tonks ever not cramped ?
>>31994211
why bother when ha go is just as good ?
There is only one correct answer.
>>31994254
Ha-go's had awful suspension and gave a VERY uncomfortable ride. The asbestos lining was partially there to protect the crew during extreme throwing around.
They're pretty inferior to the Chi-Nu. worse armor, much worse gun.
>>31977417
No it's a solution to a problem that didn't exist.
>>31994308
is the type 97 any better ?
>much worse gun
to be honest not much is needed
war with china is a bit more ww1 style
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_Chinese_military_equipment_in_World_War_II#Anti-tank_guns
>>31993952
They didn't. Japanese infantry did that.
>>31994332
of course, in China you dont need big guns, The heaviest tank they had was the Vickers 6-ton and maybe a capture Chi-Ha or Ha-Go.
A bigger gun would be more for taking out shermans or lees. Could penetrate 65mm at 1000m as compared to the 37mm on the Ha-Go and later Chi-Ha's only penetrating 43mm at 500m.
>>31994362
Shit I meant the Philippines.
a e s t h e t i c
>>31992765
Technically, the first pilot batch of heavy tanks IS-3 left the factory in May 1945. So yes - it is the ww2 tank.
>>31994384
>Literally the Vickers 6-ton but with shitter armor because soviets couldn't into metals
Ehhhhh. Even the polish did a better job with their 7TP
Fuck your rules I'm posting Aerosans. Most aesthetically pleasing vehicle of the war (at least some of them were - some of them were hideous)
More countries should have gotten the T-55M6 upgrade package.
>>31994411
AEROSAN
E
R
O
S
A
N
>>31994411
atleast they learned to make armour steel fast.
Oh, I see you only have one turret, how sad. Try a T-35b for full 360 degree coverage.
I match your Maus with a TOG.
>>31994435
>1935
>Still using multi-turreted designs
We're not designing WW1 armored cars here, pops
>>31993413
Are you saying zimmerit was for anti glare coating? Damn you're dumb.
>>31994439
The only tank that could accommodate another, smaller tank on the back deck. Seriously you could fit a Crusader up there.
>>31975358
>>31994467
What is Panzerkampfwagen Neubaufahrzeug?
>>31994531
Aw, so cute! :3
>>31994593
Srsly?
>>31994547
>>31994630
>>31994637
He can crush all enemies with his mi-mi-mi-force :3
>>31994531
IS-3/4
>>31976544
>Real tanks have curves
>>31994413
how good are these upgrade packages actually though
>>31975358
High speed, low drag
Though late in the war, I quite like the Comet for it's look. A nice looking tank as well the last of it's kind.
>>31986380
>Not wanting to fuck a tank
>Not wanting to fuck a tank personification with cute as fuck ears and tails for stroking and gently scratching
>Not wanting to fuck a tank in general
...
M24 anyone?
>>31994297
>Maus Restoration Project never
>>31993413
wow... just wow
>>31994297
>>31994439
>one correct answer
>maus
>Tog
That's cute
>>31994007
90mm of pure sex.
>>31995286
>implying
Get rich and privately own one
>http://www.mortarinvestments.eu/information/constructions
>>31975358
I'm a panther man through and through, but the Wirbelwind's crown of FlAKs is pretty too
.
>>31994515
http://www.globalsecurity.org/military/library/policy/army/accp/en0065/le5.htm
>c. Texture. Closely related to tone, texture refers to the ability of an object to reflect, absorb, or diffuse light. It may be defined as the relative smoothness or roughness of the surface. A rough surface, such as a field of grass, reflects little light and casts many shadows on itself. Consequently, it appears very dark to the eye or on a photograph. A smooth surface, such as an airstrip, even though it might be painted the same color as the surrounding terrain would show up as a lighter tone on a photograph. Very smooth, almost textureless surfaces reflect both natural and artificial light. This is known as shine, one of the most revealing breaches of camouflage discipline. Every effort must be made to eliminate the shine from smooth surfaces, including windshields, headlights, lenses of glasses, boots, even skin. Covering these surfaces with rough-textured materials or mud will reduce or eliminate the reflection of light. Texturing materials can be applied to smooth paved surfaces to help them blend with the surrounding ground and reduce tonal contrasts.
>Very smooth, almost textureless surfaces
>Very smooth, almost textureless surfaces
>Very smooth, almost textureless surfaces
What is painted metal again?
>>31995329
>actually Paying these autists to mutilate an existing slav tank to make it look like a WWII german. But in the end all you get is a useless vehicle that kinda sorta look like a extra chromosome blessed WWII german tank
Pic related, one of thier "masterpeieces"
>vomit intensifies
>>31994958
Very good if you're middle eastern, it's a huge upgrade to firepower, and the protection is uparmored to be T80U level. Also gives it a new engine and remote controlled weapon station on top. It's a pretty rad T-55.
>>31995574
>comparing modern texture cammo to WWII zimmirite
Fucking seriously? Zimmerite has literally NOTHING to do with cammo dipshit, this textured surfaces cammo meme is a new thing, the shit was for magnetic mines period,
>Zimmerit was a paste-like coating used on mid- and late-war German armored fighting vehicles during World War II. It was used to produce a hard layer covering the metal armor of the vehicle, providing enough separation that magnetically attached anti-tank mines would fail to stick to the vehicle, although Germany was the only country to use magnetic anti-tank mines in numbers. Zimmerit was often left off late-war vehicles due to the unfounded concern that it could catch on fire when hit.[1] It was developed by the German company Chemische Werke Zimmer AG.
>>31995631
>the shit was for magnetic mines period
>believing disinformation
>>31994119
>Not wanting to have to spend your days in a small hot metal box with 3 other muscular German young men.
>>31997026
>3 other muscular German young men
you mean 3 60+ year old retired reenctors