Hi /k/ Is there a gun similar to to the type 14 Nambu that isn't

A luger

>>31924940
Are you an idiot?

>>31924892
No
Nambu is a shitty Japs gun

File: 9007-1.jpg (10KB, 400x300px) Image search: [Google]

10KB, 400x300px

>>31925118
Which is why Ruger's target pistols are some of the most popular ones on the market.

>>31925118
I actually like the eurgos and feel on mine. Points well, light weight, fast, I like the thin skinny grip, and has nice balance.

Some features that I would like to see added on the T14 to improvement
>Last rnd bolt hold open
>9mm chambering
>better reliability

Other than that I think it's good platform that would be cool if revived

File: images (30).jpg (16KB, 443x332px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 443x332px

Finnish Lahti 9mm

>>31929081
Luger aesthetics without the finicky toggle.
Less prone to mud jams and with recoil booster for frozen
Snownigger steel and engineering to remove slav hordes
>dont get the cheap steel Swede Husky M40 clone as slide cracks

>>31924892

FWIW, I have had my hands on a few Nambu conversions over the years. 9mm and .32 ACP

>>31927031
Indonesia did some 9mm conversions of them post-war. With that said, I would never shoot 9mm in a Type 14. I would like to not have a bolt sticking out of my forehead.

>>31924964
You seem to be

>>31931020
A Luger is almost completely different from a Nambu. So you're also an idiot.

I eat your bait, I eat it all up.