I bought this bayonet at a gun show a couple months ago. I was

File: 20161101_114744.jpg (3MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5312x2988px

Pic of the first marking.

File: 20161101_115154.jpg (3MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

3MB, 5312x2988px

2nd marking.

>>31895975
Definitely east German. Lack of markings is odd though. Could be a repro, but based on a Soviet bloc knife instead of a real Soviet to make it easier to pass off as real deal.

Wouldn't doubt if it was real deal, though.

File: bayonets.jpg (4MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 5312x2988px

>>31896208
Have they really made repros of AK bayonets?

>>31896357
Got pictures of the other side?
Looks to me like a Yugo bayonet with EG frog.

File: 20161101_113418.jpg (2MB, 5312x2988px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 5312x2988px

>>31897561
Hopefully you can help me.

Definitely late east german. Made right at the tail end of production before the wall came down. I have one exactly like it that is unnumbered as well, and came with my East German ak74 parts kit.

Btw for future reference-

stamped or molded serial- Yugo
Electro pencil serial- german

>>31897666
Mine has no serial number. The thing is I'm beginning to suspect it's a Yugo since the little bump thing halfway down the scabbard is round on Yugos and straight on EG ones from what I can tell by google imaging.

File: 100_0800.jpg (159KB, 1104x440px) Image search: [Google]

159KB, 1104x440px

>>31897604
It is a Yugo.
The "bump" on the scabbard would wrap around to the other side if it was EG.
That is an EG frog though.
>Pic of an EG bayo for reference

File: yugoslavian-ak47-bayonet-m70.jpg (47KB, 800x800px) Image search: [Google]

47KB, 800x800px

>>31895979
Here's a Yugo with the number 2 mold on the scabbard.
I've never seen one without a serial stamped on it though.
It doesn't look like it was scrubbed either.

>>31898179
>>31898283
Alright, thanks. I have to wonder why mine doesn't have a serial number though. Strange.

Did they make any for export or civilian use? Why wouldn't they include a serial no. in that case?

>>31899755
It's possible that they were serialized to rifles and that one was never put with one.
It's definitely an oddity and a neat addition to a collection, imo.