Can the F-35 shoot down pic related? Its not allowed to

I think the real question is would the paramotor be able to shoot down the F-35?


The answer is yes.

File: maxresdefault (1).jpg (69KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

69KB, 1280x720px

>>31872575
>give the glider one of these

US air force on suicide watch

I remember back a dozen years ago when Norinco was trying to hawk these at the Chinese government as a way to improve amphibious ops.

This would fall from the turbulence of an f-35 fly-by.

File: 12241605_1041638195899663_755796794065505603_n.jpg (46KB, 481x720px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 481x720px

>>31872843
>This would fall from the turbulence of an f-35 fly-by.

Sure, but EN-B/A wings reinflate near automatically even from a full collapse.

I'm aware of Qatar, India, Russia and I'm sure several other countries use them for various functions.

Certainly not the best military asset, but they have utility if employed in the right circumstances.

>>31872544
Careful there, sonny. I got banned for posting gliders.

>>31872544
He'll just go to hover, open up the canopy, and pop the guy with his m9. It's what puts the F-35B above all other aircraft.

>>31872655
>>31872955
>>31872843
am curious would the back blast or the lunchers recoil affect the glider?

>>31872655
>not a Barrett, Anzio 20mm or even a Lahti

fucking pleb

>>31872575
So this is Retroculture

>>31872955
Plus they're probably pretty fun!

>>31873824

Rockets are recoilless. Their first stage plume is well below and behind the paraglider wing. It would have negligible effect on its flight, considering it would be no more disruptive than transitioning through a typical thermal.