Now that Hillary will win and Russian nuclear war is imminent.

>>31869788
Best option would be to move away from the US. Australia is probably a good option.

>>31869797
I can survive nuclear firestorms but I can't survive drop bear banter.

>>31869788
Consider the fact that public shelters will be stuffed with people you don't know, who don't care about you or your health, safety and valuables. Look at the chaos and looting during Katrina and imagine that but on a far, far worse scale.
Your best bet is to get the fuck out of dodge, then stay inside until the fallout has fallen.

>>31869797
but muh guns

>>31869788
yes to all of your questions
also beware of zombies and liberal robot death squads

>>31869788
Just go to a tax haven. No politician is going to bomb their stash house.

>>31869875
>Implying Hillary will let you have guns anyway

>>31869788
>Should you be ready for nuclear winter?

Nuclear winter has been debunked for like 40-50 years now?

Be prepared to spend 2-4 weeks underground, so the most severe and dangerous radition has disappeared. After that you can fairly safely move around again, if you're not a total retard and not at ground zero.

>>31869788
>Now that trump will win

FTFY

>>31869912
link

>>31869914
>people still think Drumpf can win

lol

>>31870055
>link

Link to what? Nuclear Winter being bullshit from the start?
http://lmgtfy.com/?q=nuclear+winter+debunked

>>31869914
Do you not know about fivethirtyeight?

File: 1476729405235.png (1MB, 787x3854px)

1MB, 787x3854px

>>31870112
Uh-huh.

>>31870128
Nate Silver and FiveThirtyEight are never wrong.

Trumptards and conservashits needs to leave.

>>31870128
And what does that have to do with his aggregation of data?

File: 2682568929.png (512KB, 753x1309px) Image search: [Google]

512KB, 753x1309px

>>31870128

>>31869788
>Hillary will win
>Russian nuclear war is imminent

Where did this shitty meme even come from? RT (lel) reported that Putin said (double lel) that Shillary wants a war? Big fucking deal.

Does any of you panicking faggots actually think either Russia or the US are going to launch nukes over any single international issue we currently know of? What makes you think so?
Fucking explain yourself instead of running around like headless chickens yelling about the end of the world and stockpiling tendies and piss bottles.

>>31870410
>Where did this shitty meme even come from
Hillary saying she wants to enforce a no-fly zone over Syria, as well as stating that she wants to answer hackings with military force.
This is the woman who seriously asked if they could just drone Assange.

>>31869911
>let
Lol

>>31870410
Yeah she totally has not had a hawkish/aggressive stance on Russia at all. Nor advocated for more troops on the Russian border, and for moving the shield closer too. Oh and she hasn't said we need to bomb sryian troops and if we hit russian ones its no big deal.

Ctr fuck right off, a vote for hillary is a vote for genocide.

>>31870076
>>31870141
CTR GET OUT REEEEEEEEEE.

>>31869849
A public shelter would be the last place on earth you would want to be. Think New Orleans Superdome during Katrina.

File: 321231231.jpg (304KB, 1280x1935px)

304KB, 1280x1935px

>>31870674
That's exactly what I was thinking about, but I was too lazy to Google it.

>>31870674
How is getting sexual pleasured against fine upstanding african americans a bad thing again?

>>31870689
Go back to pol, Milo.

>>31870512
>she wants to answer hackings with military force.
nice meme

>>31870742
Ha ok just ignore what >>31870642 said then.

>>31870742
http://www.ibtimes.co.uk/clinton-us-should-use-military-response-fight-cyberattacks-russia-china-1579187

File: 1476731622503.png (178KB, 1920x1080px) Image search: [Google]

178KB, 1920x1080px

>>31869914

>>31870718
>>31870742
>>31870770

Newfag is new, making independent posts not responding all at once. kys

File: Untitled.png (5KB, 582x146px) Image search: [Google]

5KB, 582x146px

>>31870817
>anyone who doesn't agree with me is a single undefined strawman

>>31870770
>Texas is in play

Every year you people say this and it never happens

>>31870642
Russia has nukes. Nothing threatens them. You cannot attack Russia but Russia can attack its neighbours. Moving NATO troops next to Russia won't worsen Russia security situation but it will make the situation better for Russia's neighbours.

The only thing Russia loses is the ability to coerce money from them neighbours and sent Russians to neighboring countries and ruin their societies.

>>31870766
>Incidents described as cyberattacks or computer network attacks are not necessarily armed attacks for the purposes of triggering a nation-state's inherent right of self-defence.

>We will be ready with serious political, economic, and military responses

>"Cyber incidents are reviewed on a case-by-case basis [...] and the national security leadership and the president will make a determination if it's an 'armed' attack."

So obviously we can determine that nuclear war is the only response to a cyber attack, you're right.

File: eks dee.png (8KB, 526x136px) Image search: [Google]

8KB, 526x136px

>>31870817
hehe

>>31870145
when the data is all bad, an aggregation of it is also bad

>>31873206
t. Drumpfkin