Lets get a thread for firearms that are likely to be safe from a possible HRC AWB
>Mini 14
>all single shots
>>31838449
>>31838449
Oh boy I fucking hope so I'll sell mine so fast just to get what I paid for it
>>31838449
She'd probably ban it and sks variants since they passed last time.
Single shot pistols like the encore and contender might be exempt from attempts to restrict handguns(nationwide roster, microstamping, all that shit from CA)...for a little while anyway.
wow another concern troll CTR-tier thread
1. dont panic buy
2. its not 1996
3. its not australia
4. vote in state and local
5. raise good children that love our constitution
6. never surrender
7. stop posting shit ass threads
>>31838943
acutally number 3 should be like "arm yourself if you are sane, legal, and capable, but stop being an AR faggot and buying a bunch of 22lr and 80% lowers and just look at guns objectively with a touch of subjectiveness and dont waste money"
SKS variants without detachable magazines.
M1 Garands
SVT-40's
Mini-14's
M1a's or whatever that M14 clone is called.
If these bad boys are still legal in CA despite all the bullshit laws, then I don't think a federal AWB would target them.
>>31838943
>>31838954
This isn't one of those.
>proposed list of newly banned guns does not include the Tavor
I never thought of this but if shit like forgeries and folding stocks get banned, couldn't we just use airsoft ones?
>>31838943
>1996
Anything in .22lr
>>31839112
an ar .22 was on the ban list
>>31838943
>2. its not 1996
>3. its not australia
yeah but those events DID happen and they can happen again. never underestimate stupid people. especially in large groups.
>>31838943
Also vote for Trump.
>>31839011
>>31838449
This might be an off topic thing to bring up, but since both rifles were mentioned, I want to ask;
I'm going to a gun show today, but I don't have cash. I'm wanting to get an SKS finally after getting to shoot one and loving it. Would I have a good chance of trading my mini 14 plus mags for a SKS? And if so, would it be a Russian, Norinco, Yugo, ect.?
>>31840833
Yes. Personally I'd only go Norinco.
>>31840833
Russian or Norinco. Make sure the parts match, and make sure the Norinco is solid. Check the bore, etc.
>>31838449
You know what? Fuck Bill Ruger. Still mad after all these years.
Fuck S&W too.
>>31841047
He's been dead for like a decade and the current CEO spent all this time undoing his bullshit and fixing his half-assedness.
Bill Ruger would shit his pants in fury if he saw that O'Fiefer was selling AR15s with 30rd mags to civilians.
M1 carbines might be RIP
Basically any scary salt guns or guns that are solely chambered in salt rounds. However, .22 guns are more than likely safe, because lol small round means no kill right. They'll be banning all the high-powered child-seeking bullets but overlook guns like the 10/22 or 22/45 that could easily be used to whack the Clinton dynasty, given that someone somehow got access to them.
>>31838954
I only started building ARs because it was a fun hobby and its super cheap to do... right now...
>>31838449
>Implying she's going to win, even with all the rigging.
>Implying she could pass a AWB by the house or Senate without one of them shooting it down or gridlocking.
>Implying an executive order for AWB wouldn't cause horrible civil unrest or maybe even outright war.
Even on the off chance Killary wins, she can't get rid of guns in one fell swoop. She'd have to pick away at the 2ndA, and you know the NRA would lobby the fuck out of anything she tried and encourage whatever bill she made to die before it can be enabled.
>>31838449
Pump-action shotguns are pretty much safe even though Shillary told everyone how much she likes the Australian AWB.
>>31842707
I'm not sure about bullpup pump-action ones though.
>>31842483
Your dog is also stern enough to hault any atf attempts.
~cute little guie
what about bullpups?
>>31838449
>planning to comply
It's your civic duty to not obey laws like the ones an awb puts in.
>>31843909
literally the first casualties along with ARs
>>31840833
nice table dude
>>31838943
Based post
also
>planning to comply
>>31839011
>he thinks endgame for CA isnt complete gun ban if they can get away with it
People seem to forget an ammo restriction of some sort will hurt equally as bad.
>>31844736
Calanon here, can confirm. Our glorious leaders plans are for mexico tier gun control or worse.
>>31838943
>its not 1996
You're right. It's the CURRENT YEAR. Why haven't guns been banned yet?
>>31838943
I'm not so much panic buying because I'm worried about Hilldog pulling a fast one on us, as i am stocking up on ammo because I'm worried about other retards panic buying.
It's the world we live in