I bet a rock could mobility kill this shit. Russia can't

File: 0_16e218_d7ca9523_orig.jpg (483KB, 1500x1125px) Image search: [Google]

483KB, 1500x1125px

>>31804722
You can even clearly see the welds. China would never do such unprofessional stuff.

>>31804722
It's too easy to knock out.

>>31804741
CHINAFAG BTFO. Seriously though, exposed welds are hardly a new thing for the Russians

>>31804722
>"Rock always win."
>~Ugh

Burgers always find a reason to trash Russian tech while masturbating towards their own. Makes it even more hilarious when ISIS blows them up.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=8XPxxWBY0v0

exposed welds make microcavitations in the air creating a layer of fine turbulence which makes the drone faster tovarisch

>>31806146
>inb4 "But muh downgraded export Abrams!"

If shitting on the T-72 for its performance in the invasion of Iraq is valid, then this is fair game as well.

I have yet to see a bad Chinese drone.

>>31806170
Bullshit, I see people flying them all the time.

>>31804722
>I bet a rock could mobility kill this shit
>https://youtu.be/ao11xwciDyI?t=157
>a canteen rock or your bayonet

File: American superweapon 1475861134809.png (706KB, 765x984px) Image search: [Google]

706KB, 765x984px

>>31806146
American equipment is a joke though.

>>31804722
what the hell is that horrifying human-rendering device on the left?

it doesn't look like any kind of mine flail

>>31806575
Oh god. Jesus Christ.
This.

>>31806575
It obviously requires the blood of Chechens

>>31806575
Quick battlefield cleanup? Like a snowblower, but you know, for people.
Seems fairly Russian.

>>31804741

Doesn't welding ruin the steels temper and deteriorate its effectiveness as armor?

>>31806327

I agree.

The only things I can justify aluminium on are aircraft and air droppable vehicles.

I love how America mixes its aircraft technology with other fields, like having tanks that use jet engines. But main battle tanks don't have aluminium skins like aircraft. For good reason.

File: th (2).jpg (13KB, 300x225px) Image search: [Google]

13KB, 300x225px

>>31806575

Antipersonnel sawblade launcher.

>>31806575
Bump because genuinely curious wtaf that is.

File: expressway_saw_2_3350375b.jpg (52KB, 620x387px) Image search: [Google]

52KB, 620x387px

>>31806799

I already told you, man.

>>31806830
>>31806672
Now I'm equally curious about THAT.
Like, how does that happen?
What the fuck went down?

Did it retardedly fall off of someone's truck?
Was the blade being used by something, flew off, and sawed it's way to the car?

>>31806575
Anti mine drone, can also be used to smash potato.

>>31806842

http://youtu.be/HvIGrLYKRh8

You know those things police make you wear when you're not allowed to leave the house?

The dude tried to outrun it but it cut him off at the pass, so to speak.

>>31806928

>anti mine drone

That's actually a damn good idea.

An all terrain giant Roomba that clears mines.

You'd probably be nominated for a Nobel Prize if you actually built a few.

>>31806575
If the vehicle runs out of fuel, you shove some Chechens in there and it starts running again.

>>31804722
>>31804741
guns not even stabilised.

>>31806644
>having tanks that use jet engines
it uses the same engine as some helicopters, and they are interchangeable.

>>31804722
REMEBER

These are your friend! They kill Russian Journalists! Well they try.

>>31806626
Depends. That shit is complicated. Probably though.

File: 1449546086914.jpg (54KB, 624x448px) Image search: [Google]

54KB, 624x448px

>>31806626
Unless the Russians treat large areas at a time somehow. I'd say leave it to the reds to fucking build pools for this shit just so they could just treat the whole fucking tank at once and put all the glass in after.

>>31806327
Russians don't have a leg to stand on when it comes to navies.

http://barentsobserver.com/en/node/19810

The only Aircraft carrier to be responsible for an oil spill is a Russian one.

>>31807350

That's fucking cool

>>31808416

Imagine all that fucking oxide after. Do they even make paint or epoxy that can survive those temps?

>>31806182
To be fair, the new Mavic Pro is pretty much best consumer systems on the market

>>31806157
Muh undeadable Abrams is stupid, but at the same time the American army has never had something like this happen.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Battle_of_Grozny_(1994–95)

>>31806147
>supercavitating tank
fund it

>>31806327
>Ship collides with a tugboat
>Sustains damage
>Durr hburr American equipment is a joke xaxaxaxa

File: 1476894170049.jpg (16KB, 196x229px) Image search: [Google]

16KB, 196x229px

>>31809838
>The end results of the New Year's Eve battle were devastating for the Russian side, with the first Russian armored column alone losing 105 of its 120 tanks and armored personnel carriers.[19] The entire first battalion of the Maikop Brigade, more than 50% of the 81st Regiment, and hundreds of men from the remaining units had been killed. A high-ranking Russian General Staff officer later said "On January 2nd, we lost contact with our forward units." According to Maskhadov, some 400 Russian tanks and APCs in all were destroyed.[20] Russian Colonel General A. Galkin reported 225 armored vehicles lost during the first month and a half of the war, including 62 tanks.[21]

>Most of the Spetsnaz detachment troops surrendered to the Chechens, "after wandering about hopelessly for three days without food, let alone any clear idea of what they were supposed to do."[1] A Russian Lieutenant Colonel was quoted when he returned from Chechen captivity as saying, "the only order was to go forward, without explanations as to what they should do, where they should go, and whom they should capture." Meanwhile, highly mobile Chechens attacked even the Russian second-echelon forces outside the city, raiding an artillery battalion.[11]

>>31810030
Jesus man you sure got baited

File: d2a25a4c5557a04988aacdfe7442e7c5.jpg (255KB, 1800x1200px) Image search: [Google]

255KB, 1800x1200px

>>31804722

Why is Russia building so many prototype meme mobiles lately?
I mean, this is basically Iran/India tier engineering, half of the shit on it doesn't make any sense in any role the vehicle could possibly hope to fill, and it's pretty obvious the absolute majority of them will go the way of the BMPT.

>>31804722
>mobility kill
Not sure about mobility kill, but the moment something goes off within 50yd of the thing you can say goodbye to half of the bullshit hanging off of it.

>>31811282
Let me tell you about military-industrial complex, anon.

File: 10915265_393207247524310_5392076657712022920_n.jpg (15KB, 552x294px) Image search: [Google]

15KB, 552x294px

>>31806142
Underrated