do any of you jack asses know when the tr3b or tr6 telos will be declassified? saw one of these babies hovering the other day then it engulfed itself in an orange plasma ball, I think it was a tr8. do you faggots know wnything about these?
bumpin fer truths
come the fuck on with it
>>31802136
Antigravity technology isn't real. If it was we'd do far more productive things with it than build oversized recon planes.
>>31802136
no you didn't
>>31802606
yes I fuckin did go eat shit and die
>>31802562
electrogravatics is real and has been since the 60s how retarded are you
>>31802629
No you didn't, you saw the thread from yesterday and wanted more info about a plane that might exist.
But I'll humor you, where and when?
>>31802647
No it isn't, if it was the US would take that shit to the bank and we'd be colonizing the solar system right about now. How retarded are YOU?
>>31802672
have you ever heard of the secret space program you cock gobbler?
>>31802562
>Antigravity technology isn't real
>mfw a Jew lizard tries to deceive me
>>31802662
didn't even know there was a thread about it yesterday. saw it in Tennessee . its not a question of do they exist. its a question of how much information is available on them, Ben Rich the head of skunkworks ""The U. S. Air Force has just given us a contract to take E. T. back home."
"We also know how to travel to the stars."
"Anything you can imagine we already know how to do."
"If you've seen it in Star Trek or Star Wars, we've been there and done that."
"We have things in the Nevada desert that are alien to your way of thinking
far beyond anything you see on Star Trek."
He also mentioned, "We already have the means to travel among the stars, but these technologies are locked up in black projects and it would take an act of God to ever get them out to benefit humanity… ...anything you can imagine we already know how to do."
He was telling us about a whole level of aircraft, of spacecraft, of advanced propulsion systems that are so far advanced. He even mentioned technologies that are 50 years beyond even what we could possibly dream of. Now, when you hear that coming from the Director of the Skunk Works, I think it is important to really take that to heart. This gentleman knew something and he was trying to tell us something. And I think this is the space program that none of us have a clue about in the civilian sector. This is what Ben Rich was trying to tell us about.
>>31802874
>>31802894
>>31802907
He was shilling for Lockheed. What do you expect?
>>31802827
Oh yeah the Secret Space Program, that one program that I totally forgot about.
>>31802874
>>31802894
>>31802907
Old man gets senile near time of death, news at 11. No you didn't see shit, why would they fly over and inhabited area when they have hundreds of square miles in Alaska and Nevada.
Just because he's the director of Skunk works doesn't mean he's some infallible dude, lots of prominent people believe stupid shit.
>>31802956
why the fuck would an old retired man do that dumbass
>>31802978
sounds pretty lucid to me. how big of a moron can you be? yeah, they fly everywhere, not just in the outback or Antarctica, dipshit
>>31802984
because he's old as fuck and sometimes old people say crazy shit.
Ok, because you seem incapable of extrapolating. What secret space program?
And no, they really don't fly everywhere, that would negate the point of making it a secret. Most people who have sworn they have seen secret aircraft flying are out in the middle of fucking nowhere.
>>31802984
What would he have to lose? He'd have the glory of everyone paying attention to him with no way to definitely prove him wrong, and he's old and retired - he can't be fired, and he'd be dead before any real consequences could get to him.
>>31803074
google Richard dolan secret space program. it is common knowledge the military technology grows exponentially contemporary with civilian technology. they are probably over 100 years ahead of civilian technology. just because you don't know about it doesn't mean it doesn't exist. the sr71 was built in 1963. its top speed is still classified and was stealth 40 years before anyone knew what stealth aircraft was. it was retired in the early 90s. what do you imagine replaced that?
>>31803164
a lifetime of living black projects out. why would he shill for skunkworks wit your strawman argument fagmo
>>31803188
>what do you imagine replaced that?
Satellites. They're better at surveillance, they don't need pilots or fuel and Russia's not really in the habit of trying to shoot them down either.
But that probably makes too much sense for you to understand it.
>>31803225
there is still the need for manned surveillance. there is a need to transport goods, humans, materials, and weapons. but I guess morons don't understand that.
>>31802647
Electrogravitics is conclusively proven to be a load of crock.
>>31802562
>Antigravity technology isn't real
>>31803321
conclusively proven by who? try again buttmunch.
>>31803326
It isn't.
>>31803291
Dumbass. Read Shadow Flights. Corona made the U-2 and SR-71 obsolete.
>when /x/ posts on /k/
I bet the people who believe in magical anti-gravity space faring spy planes are the same ones talking about how we can't even get the fucking F-35 to work.
>>31803336
http://adsabs.harvard.edu/abs/2004AIAAJ..42..315T
https://www.wired.com/2003/08/pwr-antigravity/
>>31803217
I never said he was shilling for skunkworks. I'm a different anon saying that he has nothing to lose from lying - he's not working on any of that anymore, so he's free from the consequences (fucking his employer) and he's able to pull the
>muh secrets
argument everytime someone tries to disprove what he's claiming, so he can bask in all the newfound attention.
>>31803188
Not, we know it's top speed. It's now public information. In fact it was so fast that the US government published it's top speed openly as a taunt towards the Soviets, who had nothing to counter it. It wasn't stealth, it was easily picked up by Soviet radars, but it was so fast that it didn't make much of a difference.
As for the "google this" Wow, dark government and ufodigest.com really seem great.
>>31803188
>its top speed is still classified
false
>and was stealth.
barely
>what do you imagine replaced that?
satellites and to a lesser extent disposable UAVs.
>>31803291
> there is a need to transport goods, humans, materials, and weapons.
none of which are performed with the SR-71
>>31803357
>https://www.wired.com/2003/08/pwr-antigravity/
>ionizing air is now "electrogravitics"
>>31803501
That's exactly what electrogravitics is: ion wind.
>>31803522
>electrogravitics
>gravitics
>ionizing air having anything to do with gravity
Guess how I know you're full of shit?
>>31803551
So you have no real argument against my point. Good for you.
In controlled vacuum condition, electrogravitics doesn't do jack. Clearly, it's merely psuedoscience then.
>>31803586
You want me to do the math and explain why ionizing air to lift an aircraft of that size is complete bullshit?
Can the /x/pecial children please gtfo?
>>31803586
If it worked as you claim the top above the "electrogravitic generators" would be hollow to allow air to flow through, this clearly isn't the case.
>>31803411
no it wasn't fucktard. the top speed is classified to this day. do you google? you fool
>>31803522
you are truly a retard. electrogravatics nullifies the effects of gravity and creates its own gravity due to extremely high current and magnetism. its called the unified field dickhead,
>>31802874
Nigga we've known how to travel "to the stars" since the eighties. Delta-V is just a bitch.
>>31803994
The SR-71 does not have a listed top speed because it is heavily dependent on outside factors. The Blackbird is not limited by engine power; rather it is limited by it's ability to disperse the heat build-up on its leading edges and by the bow shock wave interfering with the engine inlets.
>>3180391electrogravatics doesn't use air imbecile. highly pressurized mercury supercooled to make it a superconductor spun in a toroidal filled with high current passed through it creates localized gravity. thi is called the unified field. you are so dumb.
>>31804041
probably longer than that, but I m not the one who said it. the director of skunkworks said that retardo
>>31803994
You clear did not, type in "SR-71 top speed and it'll spit out 2,200 miles an hour (it's really like 2,223 but that's splitting hairs).
What this anon >>31804055
says, it's dependent on many different factors.
>>31804055
it is generally thought by people that matter it l go around mach 5. it is classified.
>>31803522
hahaha gtfo corky
>>31802136
>Copyright © www.theobjectreport.com
C'mon, OP
>>31804140
"generally thought" by who old men talking out of their asses again? As opposed to the men who actually flew it. who have gone on record (books, tv shows, movies, video games) to verify it's top speed.
>>31804125
that is the top speed the government told you about on its last flight across the country to the museum. the top speed is unknown to you and everyone else that is stupid enough to think they know it
>>31804140
Anyone who thinks it could make it to Mach 5 without the help of a rocket booster is guaranteed to be someone who doesn't matter. It *might* hit Mach 4 if you pointed the stick straight down.
https://youtu.be/UnUpJw5sahg
>>31804097
>now it defies physics by not using reaction mass
Holy shit, and I thought le ionized air was a dumb explanation.
>>31804338
not defies physics, it uses physics my simple friend, try it sometime.
>>31802136
>develop levitation technology in secret
>develop active camouflage in secret
>develop stealth communications technology in secret
>build stealth aircraft the size of an office building utilizing all these technologies
>keep everything under wraps so tightly that the technology doesn't even appear in media
>realize you already built a satellite network that renders it obsolete
>equip it with massive high-visibility spotlights
>leave them on while flying over populated areas
why is the illuminati so incompetent
>>31804400
>doesn't use any reaction mass
>produces thrust
>some kind of bullshit artificial gravity pseudoscience that amounts to pic related
Something tells me the one that doesn't know physics is you.
>>31804185
they didn't fly it that fast on its last flight
why would the government be talking about it on it's last flight, most last flights are made by a 3rd party interested in maintain aircraft for future generations and because of the educational value.
>>31804470
sr71 wasn't in media for how many years?
military compartmentalizes so very few know the extent of what is truly there
not obsolete because carries people and material trans atmospherically
not spotlights either electrogravatics or provides lift
why are you a huge moron?
>>31804504
electrogravatics reduces the gravity and g forces by 90 percent. that is the object in the center of the craft. each corner has an engine to provide lift and thrust. thanks for playing though.
https://youtu.be/rmjYvquPau0
agrav
http://www.drboylan.com/xplanes2.html
check this you cumguzzlers
>>31804684
>>31804721
You realize you're arguing at least 3 people and we're all laughing at you?
>sr71 wasn't in media for how many years?
Negative 2, LBJ revealed it to the public before it was even service.
>military compartmentalizes so very few know the extent of what is truly there
You can't hide a project of this scale. Every physicist and engineer in the country would have to be involved and actively hiding it. You're also assuming no physicists or engineers outside of the country can replicate the principles behind it or publish any information pertaining to them.
>muh electrogravitics
Again, assuming the universe doesn't work the way that it does in reality and this shit is real. Why is it only applied to an oversized spyplane instead of the countless other far more practical applications?
>>31804824
I cant help it if your stupid butthurt faggots. negative lbj did not. f117a flew for over 10 years before it was talked about. idiots said the same things about black flying delta shaped craft then too, hid manhattan project for years. also sr71 project. thank you come again.
>>31804953
>negative lbj did not.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jq5Ahat8nro
>hid manhattan project for years.
The Manhattan Project didn't require completely rewriting physics, just applying new developments in it.
>also sr71 project.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Jq5Ahat8nro
>>31804953
LBJ did. as for the F-117, there were rumors of it flying, it was finally publicly unveiled those many years later. Much like the U2 and other aircraft.
>>31804824
This anon is right, in order to keep 100 accountability you'd need a crew of less than 25 people, any larger and it becomes impossible to keep the lid on things. As awesome as it would be to have this tech IRL, they don't.
>>31802647
this, it was invented by the nazis during ww2, that's why they transported so much mercury in their submarines
>>31805082
Then why didn't they win the war? For that matter, why does the US still bother with international politics when according to you has the technology to do whatever it wants with impunity?
>>31805132
Most of the top nazi officials knew Hitler was a nut and capitulated to the allies in '44, they escaped to South America, and then they set up research bases in the Antarctica. They still operated with the US and the soviets in disguise. They just let hitler die with his power delusions.
captcha: achtung limitee
>>31803188
^ unfortunately this is actually true.
Most military innovation won't find a civilian use for 30+ years or so.
Take Inconel for example, a superalloy. Without it your modern fancy suppressors wouldn't be nearly as lightweight and durable.
If anti-gravity was real then the Russians, Europeans, Chinese, and Indians would all have developed it as well and put it into service and parade their physics defying contraptions for propaganda. Something as revolutionary as anti-gravity would not stay quiet. Other countries have scientists too.
>>31805175
You didn't answer either of my questions. If the Nazis had game changing technology like gravity manipulation why did they use it against the allies even once?
If the US has gravity manipulation technology why does it bother fighting over oil in the middle east when it can obtain whatever it wants from anywhere in the entire solar system?
>>31803411
>Not, we know it's top speed.
False
The rates top speed is far lower that it's real top speed.
The Dude that flew sr71s(burn victim) said he legged the throttle for over 45 sec at Mach 3.4.
Said it maxed out the Mach gauge and he'd never heard such weird sounds come from an sr71.
>>31805239
>If the US has gravity manipulation technology why does it bother fighting over oil in the middle east when it can obtain whatever it wants from anywhere in the entire solar system?
Because idiots with bleak lives and hyperactive imaginations have to believe they know something everybody else doesn't in order to feel like their boring existence has any meaning or value.
>>31805175
Way to totally not answer that anons question. And no, we didn't work in secret with Nazi officials after they fled to South America, we tried them and hung them. Those who were not captured were hunted down (by the Israelis and the Yugoslavians interestingly enough). Stop with the conspiracy theories.
>>31805281
This
>>31805251
>said he legged the throttle for over 45 sec at Mach 3.4.
Said it maxed out the Mach gauge and he'd never heard such weird sounds come from an sr71.
>he'd never heard such weird sounds come from an sr71.
Maybe that's why the rated top speed is mach 3.3
>>31805233
>If anti-gravity was real then the Russians, Europeans, Chinese, and Indians would all have developed it as well and put it into service and parade their physics defying contraptions for propaganda.
if anti-gravity was real, the US would be whipping it around like a fifteen-inch dick. We'd have flying aircraft carriers and interstellar battleships and our billionaires would live on floating private islands. It would be the most incredible technology of the century, but I guess instead we're using it to float some stealthy doritos above rural Maine?
>>31805667
Could they keep the technology out of civilian hands? If not, an upset of power would be imminent.
>>31805744
>Could they keep the technology out of civilian hands?
Why the fuck would they?
>>31805455
>And no, we didn't work in secret with Nazi officials after they fled to South America, we tried them and hung them.
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Operation_Paperclip
>>31806089
Yes, scientists and engineers. I did not say high level Nazi officials. BTW look into the lives and religions of those men taken to the USA the vast majority were either forced to work under penalty of their families death or were not even adherents to the Nazi party, they joined because they had to. Also, many were actually Jewish.
>>31806089
also, i'm shocked it took you that long to figure out the US did that
>>31802672
>believing that any discovered tech immediately gets trumpeted on the news and utilized for the betterment of mankind
>ignoring that hitler's best made mercury propulsion antigrav in the 40's
>thinking nothing is kept secret from We The People
oh, my heartiest keks
>>31806397
1. I'm a different anon, but that should be telling how delusional you sound.
2. Hitler didn't do that, his "best" could barely make anything approaching workable tech, as he had placed such ridiculous ideas and timetables on them that they based fumbled around making stupid wonder weapons the whole war. If the Germans actually had that tech, they would have absolutely used it.
3. They do have secrets, just not what you're saying. So, to reiterate your first point, no you didn't see a spyplane fly over Tennessee, you're just schizophrenic.
When did /k/ become /x/?
>>31806525
they did use it- hannebu
>>31805455
Nazis fled to Antarctica before the war ended, admiral byrd s expedition to there was ended by theses flying crafts. it was clearly a military expedition. what do you have to say now faggot?
>>31805667
>float some stealthy doritos
>>31802136
It's pretty cool how the UFO nutjobs have started to make their fanciful scenarios a little bit more realistic.
Kinda like how religions are always slowly adapting their interpretations of the bible to be little more suitable for the times.
>>31802136
Literally the stupidest shit of all time. A drone can do this job just as well, for literally 1000th of the cost.
Even if this technology existed, why the fuck would you want to build it?
>>31807895
>>31807917
>use it
>still lose the war