Dear /k/, could you please provide me with your best infographics

File: 1476478308115.png (2MB, 956x1200px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 956x1200px

>>31772779
Bampu

>>31772779
Liberals don't care about "facts"

>>31772818
Thanks man! If you have any more, please post them.

Maybe for once we can have one of these threads with infographics that don't either pander to the simplest of simpletons or cite statistics that don't stand up to even cursory scrutiny.

But I'm not holding my breath.

File: operator_spin.gif (2MB, 163x86px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 163x86px

I am here and appreciating the info dump. Thanks anons!

File: 1456647971660.jpg (128KB, 780x520px) Image search: [Google]

128KB, 780x520px

Bump. Anyone have any more images?

>>31772979
.......... I hate that image

File: 2016-10-23-01-06-03-430503139.jpg (192KB, 689x499px)

192KB, 689x499px

Contribootin with scary nazi based appeal to emotion

>>31772779
Is innocent life worth safeguarding? Is the individual responsible for his/her personal safety? If the assumed answer to these questions is "yes", which is the case in American political philosophy, then a right to keep and bear arms naturally follows.

>>31773002
I wish Charlie Rangel would just die already

I'm still angry that machine guns were banned illegally by him and nothing happened to him

>>31773403
Lawmakers get unfair advantages. It's just the way it is, sadly.

Anyone have any more info graphics?

>>31772979
Why has nobody bought and tried to restore that thing?

>>31772831
Is the unspecified category the Clinton Foundation murders?

Warren v Distreict of Columbia (Washington DC)

Is the strongest argument I have.

Basically, 2 women at home, people break in, women hid and called 911 twice. Police showed up twice- knocked on the door the first time, didn't get out of their car the second.

Intruders find women, take hem to another location, rape and beat them for 17 hours.

Women sue for failure of the police to respond and protect them.

High court ruled that police owe no duty to protect citizens.

https://en.m.wikipedia.org/wiki/Warren_v._District_of_Columbia

File: image.jpg (121KB, 800x566px) Image search: [Google]

121KB, 800x566px

>>31772779

bampu

>>31775700
That's insane. And people will still say it's ok to take away more gun rights.

>>31772979
Stay awake sleepy tank

>>31772919
This really spoke to me, great post anon.

>>31772779
No infographics needed. Gun-grabbers will need to have someone do their dirty work. When their thugs are going around kicking doors and confiscating property, everyone will see and understand the purpose of the second amendment.