I'm not saying that the UK has the most Aesthetic ships

File: CvTvqMhWYAAYz6k.jpg (145KB, 1199x957px) Image search: [Google]

145KB, 1199x957px

>>31760486
To this

File: RFS Admiral Gorshkov.jpg (223KB, 1600x1199px) Image search: [Google]

223KB, 1600x1199px

>>31760499
Its from the 1970s, look up Invincible or Broadsword class if you wan't to see some ugly brit ships from the same period.
Gorshkov and Steregushchy classes look far better than the Daring class.

File: pyoter_velikiy_kreiser.jpg (55KB, 460x268px) Image search: [Google]

55KB, 460x268px

>>31760486
>>31760499
top looks like a conehead
bottom looks like a warship
I don't know about how good the Ivan NAvy is, but this is a sleek, sexy bitch

File: INS Ranjit.jpg (143KB, 1248x832px) Image search: [Google]

143KB, 1248x832px

Rajput Class Destroyer

Type: Guided missile destroyer

Displacement: 4,974 tonnes full load[1]

Length: 147 m (482 ft)

Beam: 15.8 m (52 ft)

Draught: 5 m (16 ft)

Propulsion: 4 x gas turbine engines; 2 shafts, 72,000 hp (54,000 kW)

Speed: 35 knots (65 km/h)

Range:
4,000 mi (6,400 km) at 18 knots (33 km/h)
2,600 miles (4,200 km) at 30 knots (56 km/h)

Complement: 320 (including 35 officers)

Sensors and processing systems:

Navigation: 2 x Volga (NATO: Don Kay) radar at I-band frequency,

Air: 1 x MP-500 Kliver (NATO: Big Net-A) radar at C-band or 1 x Bharat RAWL (Dutch Signaal LW08) radar at D-band (installed on INS Ranjit),

Air/Surface: 1 x MR-310U Angara (NATO: Head Net-C) radar at E-band, replaced by 1 x EL/M-2238 STAR[2]
Communication: Inmarsat,

Sonar: 1 x hull mounted Vycheda MG-311 (NATO: Wolf Paw) sonar replaced with Bharat HUMSA during MLR, 1 x Vyega MG-325 (NATO: Mare Tail) variable depth sonar

Armament:

Anti-surface:

INS Rajput
4 × Brahmos supersonic missiles and 2 x SS-N-2D Styx AShM missiles
1 × Dhanush ballistic missile

INS Rana, INS Ranjit
4 × SS-N-2D Styx AShM missiles

INS Ranvir, INS Ranvijay
8 × Brahmos in aft VLS and 4 x SS-N-2D Styx AShM missiles

Air-defence:
2 × S-125M (NATO: SA-N-1) SAM launchers
1 × S-125M (NATO: SA-N-1) SAM launcher in Ranvir and Ranvijay
2 × Barak SAM 8 cell launchers in Ranvir and Ranvijay

Guns:
1 × 76.2 mm main gun
4 × 30 mm AK-230 CIWS in Rajput and Rana
4 × 30 mm AK-630M CIWS in Ranjit
2 × 30 mm AK-630M CIWS in Ranvir, Ranvijay

Anti-submarine:
1 × 533 mm PTA 533 quintuple torpedo tube launcher
2 × RBU-6000 anti-submarine mortars

Aircraft carried: 1 x Ka-28 in last two ships and HAL Chetak helicopter in first three ships

File: INS Mumbai.jpg (377KB, 1147x898px) Image search: [Google]

377KB, 1147x898px

Delhi Class Destroyer

Type: Guided-missile destroyer

Displacement: 6,200 tonnes (full)[1]

Length: 163 m (535 ft)

Beam: 17.4 m (57 ft)

Draught: 6.5 m (21 ft)

Propulsion:
2 × M36E gas turbine plants;
2 shafts;
4 × DT-59 reversible gas turbines;
2 × RG-54 gearboxes;
64,000 shp (48,000 kW)

Speed: over 28 knots (52 km/h; 32 mph)

Range: 5,000 mi (8,000 km)

Complement: 350 (incl 40 officers)

Sensors and processing systems:
1 × MR-775 Fregat MAE air search radar
1 × Bharat RAWL (Dutch Signaal LW08) surface search radar
3 × MR-212/201 Vaygach-U (NATO: Palm Frond) navigation radars, JRC SATCOM
1 × Bharat APSOH or HUMSA sonar
1 × Garden Reach Model 15-750 variable depth sonar or 1 × Thales ATAS[2]

Armament:
16 × Kh-35 Switchblade (SS-N-25) SSM (4 × quadruple KT-184 launchers)
32 × Barak 1 (4 × 8 cell VLS units)
2 × Shtil SAM systems (48 × Shtil-1 missiles)
1 × 100 mm AK-100 gun
2 × 30 mm AK-630 gatling guns
2 × RBU-6000 213 mm anti-submarine mortar arrays
1 × 5 533-millimetre (21 in) torpedo tubes

Aircraft carried: 2 × Sea King helicopters

File: INS Kolkata.jpg (211KB, 1024x687px) Image search: [Google]

211KB, 1024x687px

Kolkata Class Destroyer

Type: Stealth guided missile destroyer[1]

Displacement: 7,400 t (7,300 long tons; 8,200 short tons) full load[2]

Length: 163 m (535 ft)

Beam: 17.4 m (57 ft)

Draft: 6.5 m (21 ft)

Propulsion:

Combined gas and gas system: Twin Zorya M36E gas turbine plants with 4 × DT-59 reversible gas turbines and 2 × RG-54 gearboxes
2 × Bergen/GRSE KVM-diesel engines, 9,900 hp (7,400 kW) each
4 × 1 MWe Wärtsilä WCM-1000 generator sets driving Cummins KTA50G3 engines and Kirloskar 1 MV AC generators

Speed: In excess of 30 knots (56 km/h)

Range: 8,000 nautical miles (15,000 km; 9,200 mi) at 18 knots (33 km/h; 21 mph)

Complement: 40 Officers and 350 Sailors[3]

Sensors and processing systems:
IAI EL/M-2248 MF-STAR S-band AESA multi-function radar[4]
Thales LW-08 D-band air search radar[5]
BEL HUMSA-NG bow sonar
BEL Nagin active towed array sonar[6]
BEL Electronic Modular Command & Control Applications (EMCCA Mk4)/CMS15A combat management system[4]

Electronic warfare & decoys:
Elbit Systems Deseaver MK II counter-measures systems and defensive aids suite
ELLORA MK I electronic support measures
NSTL Maareech Advanced Torpedo Defence System
Kavach chaff decoy system

Armament:

Anti-air missiles:
4 × 8-cell VLS, for a total of 32;[7][8]
Barak 8 missiles (Range: 0.5 km (0.31 mi) to 90 km (56 mi)[9])

Anti-ship/Land-attack missiles:
2 × 8-cell UVLM for 16 BrahMos anti-ship and land-attack missiles[8][10]

Guns:
1 × 76 mm gun Oto Melara SRGM
4 × AK-630 CIWS

Anti-submarine warfare:
4 × 533 mm Torpedo tubes
2 × RBU-6000 anti-submarine rocket launchers

Aircraft carried: 2 × Sea King or HAL Dhruv helicopters

Aviation facilities:
Flight deck
Dual Enclosed hangar for a combination of 2 Seaking, Chetak or Dhruv helicopters

File: INS Ranvir.jpg (2MB, 2850x1900px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 2850x1900px

>>31761279

File: INS Ranvijay.jpg (498KB, 2100x1295px) Image search: [Google]

498KB, 2100x1295px

>>31761279
.

File: INS Rana.jpg (46KB, 1000x402px) Image search: [Google]

46KB, 1000x402px

>>31761279
..

>>31761327
ah yes prajeet, very nice. which is the part you shit on?

File: INS Rajput.jpg (25KB, 800x450px) Image search: [Google]

25KB, 800x450px

>>31761279


>>31761399
Thanks and its the The blue sea part.

File: INS Mysore.jpg (851KB, 2302x1500px) Image search: [Google]

851KB, 2302x1500px

>>31761306

File: INS Delhi.jpg (2MB, 3888x2592px) Image search: [Google]

2MB, 3888x2592px

>>31761306
.

File: INS Kochi.jpg (59KB, 584x559px) Image search: [Google]

59KB, 584x559px

>>31761327

File: HMS Diamond-02.jpg (785KB, 2749x1780px) Image search: [Google]

785KB, 2749x1780px

Makes my dick....

File: 1476996000276.jpg (226KB, 1432x964px) Image search: [Google]

226KB, 1432x964px

You may want to double check flags on those rustbuckets.

>>31761279
>>31761306
>>31761327
Those stats are real nice anon, but how many toilets do they have? Is there a designated shitting deck?

>>31762048
Thanks, The sea's our toilet anon.

File: pompolice.webm (1MB, 640x360px) Image search: [Google]

1MB, 640x360px

>>31760486
No they look shitty and bloated, a bit like early 3D graphics.

>>31762272
This is a disgrace to the word 'Police'. Indian police would have beat that nigger to death with bamboo sticks.

>>31762304
>Police didn't arrest a man exactly how I'd have liked

Oh God, pbuH.

Those are really ugly ships, no taste. Can anyone post British ships?

>>31762324
Its not about arresting, it's embarrassing to see that its taking so long for so many police officers to arrest an unarmed (not having a gun) nigger

File: kekmit.jpg (22KB, 587x583px)

22KB, 587x583px

>>31761476
>INS Mysore
More like INS Eyesore

>>31762619
I don't get it? Why eye sore?

File: 1477125409819.jpg (22KB, 720x450px)

22KB, 720x450px

>>31761671

Not rust, just a crappy image.

Royal Navy's ships are even more pleasing to eye than USN' ships except zumwalt

>>31762633
That's what it is in comparison to the AESTHETIC Alreigh Burke class behind it

File: INS-kolkata-03.jpg (126KB, 1200x900px)

126KB, 1200x900px

>>31762673
Idk whether its a good or bad thing but INS Mysore isn't our top class destroyer.

Its INS Kochi and INS Kolkata

File: spooky future battleship.jpg (91KB, 850x430px) Image search: [Google]

91KB, 850x430px

>>31761671
Why is it that vatnik memes are almost exactly like their arguments in that even their newest are stale and irrelevant?

>>31761279
>>31761306
>>31761327
>>31761346
>>31761353
>>31761393
>>31761438
>>31761476
>>31761486
>>31761494
What the fuck is it with pooinloos hijacking navy threads at the moment? 3rd time in 2 days

>>31763069
I am a little old school and find that future battleship heinous.

>>31763073
Hey we have a better Navy than most nations on the globe. You better get used to the fact now.

>>31761671
don't take /britpol/ seriously.

>>31762661
Shame the Zumwalt is a piece of expensive trash.

>>31760486
Needs more dakka

>>31763336
Why?

>>31763085

There's a reason India's navy has dedicated pages to all the times they fuck up and burn or crash.

There's a good reason no-one takes you seriously, mostly anyone who's ever worked with Indians.

File: Desi Beach.webm (831KB, 1280x720px) Image search: [Google]

831KB, 1280x720px

>>31763361
You just need to chat a little bro

File: 1435358438880.jpg (328KB, 1800x1641px)

328KB, 1800x1641px

>>31760486
>compared to Russian rust buckets, wouldn't you agree that the neo modern lines of British destroyers are far more pleasing to the eyes than Russian ship builders
Nope.

>>31763361
>There's a reason India's navy has dedicated pages to all the times they fuck up and burn or crash.
On Russian build carriers, Russian vessels have always been a mess and that's why we are focusing on indigenous stuff. Like the 90% of all the Frigates and Destroyers are Indian made now in Navy.

Also our main concern is Pookistan and China and Chinese navy is more suckier than ours

>There's a good reason no-one takes you seriously, mostly anyone who's ever worked with Indians.
No one takes us seriously because we like to be pacifist this is why North Korean failed short ranged nuclear capable ballistic missiles created more hype than our intercontinental nuclear capable ballistic missile.

File: 2190.jpg (164KB, 1658x1278px) Image search: [Google]

164KB, 1658x1278px

>>31760486
daily reminder the modern "stealth" ships with their sleek sides and very modern looks all originate from the french Lafayette class light frigates (FLF).

And back then everyone was finding these stupid. Until they aknowledged that, once again, the french were right.

You can therefore gently put your misplaced pride in your butthole where it belongs.

Cheerio bong.

>>31763484

>all originate from the french Lafayette class light frigates (FLF).

Except they weren't, you think the French were the only ones who figured that out? Talk about misplaced self importance.

> Until they aknowledged that, once again, the french were right.

I'll take a "things that didn't happen", Richard.

The US had reduced RCS concepts already either in service or in testing a decade before the first La-Fayette was even launched. Sea Shadow was already a thing. Arleigh Burke has RCS technology in it. Everyone already knew about it from planes.

La-Fayette had nothing to do to influence other nations, the technology never originated from it. Every other major nation had already figured it out themselves and either had already build some or were just waiting for their own programs to start to put it into production.

File: panther-0004.jpg (62KB, 1024x652px)

62KB, 1024x652px

>>31763548
Sure thing. Prove it.

>le Sea shadow meme.
prototype catamaran. Not single hulled boat. Never operational. Never commissioned. Try again.

>le arleight burke stealth
Dude have you ever seen an arleigh burke ? It's full of fucking external non-integrated stuff goddamit.

>La-Fayette had nothing to do to influence other nations
Which is why everyone began to issue boats having this layout WAY after 1996, which is exactly when the Lafayette entered service. You are so deluded it's delightful.

The Type 23 brit frigates were originally supposed to be stealth, except thanks to the continuous adding of external equipments they ended having classical layout.

What are Type 26 ? What are type 45 ? Exactly what the type 23 was supposed to be. Except these were commissioned just a few years ago, 20 YEARS after the Lafayette. TWENTY. FUCKING. YEARS.

Believe it or not the Horizon program was originally a french/italian/british program. Only the french and italians continued this program. Well the british engineers told their french counterparts : "do not do the same mistakes we did, plan your dimensions to keep everything inside that's the key."

Everyone else thought it was a dead end. Hence why the first fully integrated masture US ships are only getting out of docks today : the LCS and Zumwalt.

Meanwhile, everyone else took the train en route AFTER the commissioning of the Lafayette frigates. Which were the first stealth OPERATIONAL ships to feature this level of discretion.

France first commissioned and operational stealth ship : Lafayette : 1996
Sweden's first commissioned and operational stealth ship : Visby : 2000
Russia's first commissioned and operational stealth ship : Guepard (project 11661) : 2003
China's first commissioned and operational stealth ship : type 22 : 2004
Britain's first commissioned and operational stealth ship : type 45 : 2009
Germany's first commissioned and operational stealth ship : F-125 : 2014

TL;DR : i'm right, you're wrong.

>>31764013

Burden of proof motherfucker, you claimed that La-Fayette was the design inspiration and basis for all others. All you're saying is IT WAS LAUNCHED FIRST NYAH NYAH and not actually showing any evidence that its design influenced other countries.

I'd like to see proof from every such nation then that they based it on La-Fayette.

>prototype catamaran. Not single hulled boat. Never operational. Never commissioned. Try again.

So now we're pretending that just because it wasn't in service means that the US didn't learn how to use RCS from it? Are you actually a fucking retard? It was a technology demonstrator, they knew about how to reduce RCS decades before. The same goes for almost any country.

>Dude have you ever seen an arleigh burke ? It's full of fucking external non-integrated stuff goddamit.

Meanwhile in reality, what constitutes radar cross section isn't based on your personal opinion but actually hard maths. Sorry if it doesn't look effeminate and smooth for your tastes, but thats how it works.

>Except these were commissioned just a few years ago, 20 YEARS after the Lafayette.

It's almost like developing a ship thats barely more than an enlarged OPV is faster to develop or something than a top end AAW destroyer. Who knew.

And in which world do you live in where all projects start and end equally? RCS is one of the SMALLEST developments in these modern ships. Other countries had bigger focuses for their budgets at the time, or the current ships didn't need replacing until much later. The Duke class for example is still very capable even today, so its replacement wasn't a priority.

>Believe it or not the Horizon program was originally a french/italian/british program.

You say this like it isn't common knowledge.

> Only the french and italians continued this program

Because the Brits correctly decided the Horizon didn't meet their requirements for anti-air warfare (it doesn't even have a fucking AESA) and went off to build something better.

>>31764013

>prototype catamaran. Not single hulled boat. Never operational. Never commissioned. Try again.

Do you even understand what an experimental prototype is for you fucking frog?

The US had this technology long before France started claiming they invented it.

>>31764013
>The Type 23 brit frigates were originally supposed to be stealth

proofs?

File: indiannavy_1.png (79KB, 643x967px) Image search: [Google]

79KB, 643x967px

>>31763085
>>31763392

File: indiannavy_2.png (80KB, 642x967px) Image search: [Google]

80KB, 642x967px

>>31764747

File: indiannavy_3.png (74KB, 643x967px)

74KB, 643x967px

>>31764760

File: indiannavy_4.png (40KB, 643x571px) Image search: [Google]

40KB, 643x571px

>>31764775

>>31764013

Do you seriously think that nations immediately build ships as soon as they discover one new technology and that if they weren't the very first that means that everyone else just copied them and use their tech?

Countriers make ships when they need the new ships, and whatever technology they've developed in the meantime will likely get put into it. It just so happened France needed its patrol boats and thus put the tech into them.

Thats a literal "it's fucking nothing" outcome. The only people who harp it up are frogs trying to shill French still endlessly on /k/.

Brits are like Finns overhyping their shit. Fuck off, no one cares

>>31765663

>Entire thread is about aesthetics, an entirely subjective thing
>Someone gets butthurt that Brit boats are even vaguely mentioned
>In a thread in which Indians and French are shilling their stuff relentlessly

/k/ everybody

>>31764395
>>31764413
>>31764711
>>31765055
MAXIMUM BUTTHURT DETECTED.

This is why your opinion will never be relevant. This just right there.

Fact :
1996, the Lafayette is commissioned and operational. Way before other programs of this kind.

Deal with it faggots.

I don't blame you personnaly though, in a stupid youtube doc about stealth ships that was full of pics of the Lafayette, the host NEVER talked about it, and he must have been 50 years old.

So I can't blame 15 y/o anglo kiddies for a deficience that is linked to their own race.

I hope you will be consumed in your own arrogance and hatred. That's the only way you learn.

Set sail for fail my minions ! I'll wait for you at the port's inn.

>>31766866

Asking for source is a form of butthurt. Epic dude. Simply epic.

File: OycLC99.jpg (137KB, 1600x888px) Image search: [Google]

137KB, 1600x888px

i'm not sure how much use a battlecruiser is in this day and age, but this is to me the most menacing looking ship since they Iowas were put to sleep

>>31760486
Russian ships look prettier, sorry Bong.

I can confirm that the Type 45 is the sexiest thing on the water. Gotta look good when you're decimating the Argie air force singlehanded.

File: US_Navy_050413-N-5526M-016_The_Arleigh_Burke-class_guided_missile_destroyer_USS_Mustin_(DDG_89)_underway_in_the_Northern_Persian_Gulf_while_conducting_Maritime_Security_Operations[1].jpg (4MB, 2240x1792px) Image search: [Google]

4MB, 2240x1792px

Perfection.

>>31766866

>Make a beyond retarded claim
>Get asked to provide a source
>LOL YOU ALL BUTTHURT